The objective of this paper is to develop a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) methodology against volcanic eruption for decay heat removal function of sodium-cooled fast reactors (SFRs). In the volcanic PRA methodology development, only the effect of volcanic tephra (pulverized magma) is taken into account, because there is a great distance between a plant site assumed in this study and volcanoes. The volcanic tephra (ash) could potentially clog air filters of air-intakes that are essential for the decay heat removal. The degree of filter clogging can be calculated by atmospheric concentration of ash and tephra fallout duration and also suction flow rate of each component. This study evaluated a volcanic hazard using a combination of tephra fragment size, layer thickness, and duration. In this paper, functional failure probability of each component is defined as a failure probability of filter replacement obtained by using a grace period to filter failure. Finally, based on an event tree, a core damage frequency has been estimated by multiplying discrete hazard frequencies by conditional decay heat removal failure probabilities. A dominant sequence has been identified as well. In addition, sensitivity analyses have investigated the effects of a tephra arrival reduction factor and prefilter covering.

References

References
1.
AESJ
,
2007
, “
Implementation Standard of Seismic Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants: 2007
,” Atomic Energy Society of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, Standard No. AESJ-SC-P006:2007.
2.
AESJ
,
2012
, “
Implementation Standard Concerning the Tsunami Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Nuclear Power Plants: 2011
,” Atomic Energy Society of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, Standard No. AESJ-SC-RK004E:2011.
3.
AESJ
,
2014
, “
Implementation Standard Concerning the Selection of Risk Assessment Methodology: 2014
,” Atomic Energy Society of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, Standard No. AESJ-SC-RK008:2014.
4.
ASME and ANS
,
2013
, “
Standard for Level 1/Large Early Release Frequency Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Nuclear Power Plant Applications
,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers/American Nuclear Society, New York, Standard No. ASME/ANS Standard RA-Sb-2013.
5.
NRC
,
1991
, “
Procedural and Submittal Guidance for Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities
,” Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Rockville, MD, Report No.
NUREG-1407
.https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1407/
6.
IAEA
,
1995
, “
Treatment of External Hazards in Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants. A Safety Practice
,” International Atomic Agency, Vienna, Austria, IAEA-Safety Series No.
50-P-7
.https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:26041556
7.
OECD and NEA
,
2014
, “
Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) of Natural External Hazards Including Earthquakes
,” Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, and Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris, France, Report No.
NEA/CNRA/R(2014)9
.https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:46027267
8.
ENSREG
,
2012
, “
Stress Tests Performed on European Nuclear Power Plants
,” European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group, Brussels, Belgium, Report No. 2012-04-25.
9.
Yamano
,
H.
,
Nishino
,
H.
,
Kurisaka
,
K.
,
Sakai
,
T.
,
Yamamoto
,
T.
,
Ishizuka
,
Y.
,
Geshi
,
N.
,
Furukawa
,
R.
,
Nanayama
,
F.
, and
Takata
,
T.
,
2014
, “
Development of Margin Assessment Methodology of Decay Heat Removal Function Against External Hazards—Project Overview and Preliminary Risk Assessment Against Snow
,”
12th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference
(
PSAM 12
), Honolulu, HI, June 22–27, p.
44
.http://jolissrch-inter.tokai-sc.jaea.go.jp/search/servlet/search?5045434&language=1
10.
IAEA
,
2012
, “
Volcanic Hazards in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Installations
,” Specific Safety Guide, International Atomic Agency, Vienna, Austria, Series No.
SSG-21
.http://www-pub.iaea.org/books/IAEABooks/8774/Volcanic-Hazards-in-Site-Evaluation-for-Nuclear-Installations
11.
IAEA
,
2016
, “
Volcanic Hazard Assessments for Nuclear Installations: Methods and Examples in Site Evaluation
,” International Atomic Agency, Vienna, Austria, IAEA TECDOC No.
1795
.http://www-pub.iaea.org/books/IAEABooks/11063/Volcanic-Hazard-Assessments-for-Nuclear-Installations-Methods-and-Examples-in-Site-Evaluation
12.
Bonadonna
,
C.
,
2006
, “
Probabilistic Modelling of Tephra Dispersion
,”
Statistics in Volcanology
, International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth's Interior (IAVCEI), GeoScienceWorld, McLean, VA, pp.
243
259
.
13.
Connor
,
C. B.
,
Hill
,
B. E.
,
Winfrey
,
B.
,
Franklin
,
N. M.
, and
La Femina
,
P. C.
,
2001
, “
Estimation of Volcanic Hazards From Tephra Fallout
,”
Nat. Hazards Rev.
,
2
(
1
), pp.
33
42
.
14.
De La Cruz-Reyna
,
S.
,
1991
, “
Poisson-Distributed Patterns of Explosive Eruptive Activity
,”
Bull. Vocanol.
,
54
(
1
), pp.
57
67
.
15.
Yamamoto
,
T.
,
Ishizuka
,
Y.
,
Geshi
,
N.
,
Furukawa
,
R.
, and
Nanayama
,
F.
,
2013
, “
Research and Development of Margin Assessment Methodology of Decay Heat Removal Function Against External Hazards (2) Development of External Hazard Assessment Methodology for Volcanic Eruption
,”
Fall Meeting 2013 of Atomic Energy Society of Japan
, Hachinohe, Japan, Sep. 3–5, p.
G45
.
16.
Connor
,
L.
, and
Connor
,
C.
,
2011
, “
Tephra2 Users Manual
,” University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, accessed Sept. 24, 2017, https://vhub.org/resources/756/download/Tephra2_Users_Manual.pdf
17.
Takahiro Yamamoto
,
2016
, “
Numerical Simulation for the Daisen-Kurayoshi Tephra, Japan
,” Geological Survey of Japan, AIST, Ibaraki, Japan, Report No. 635.
18.
Yamamoto
,
T.
,
Ishizuka
,
Y.
,
Geshi
,
N.
,
Furukawa
,
R.
, and
Nanayama
,
F.
,
2015
, “
Research and Development of Margin Assessment Methodology of Decay Heat Removal Function Against External Hazards (11) Development of External Hazard Assessment Methodology for Volcanic Eruption
,”
Fall Meeting 2015 of Atomic Energy Society of Japan
, Shizuoka, Japan, Sep. 9–11, p.
E48
.
19.
Morikawa
,
T.
,
1979
, “
Fluid-Solid Two-Phase Flow—Aerodyanamic and Hydraulic Transport
,” Nikkan Kogyo Simbun Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
20.
Yamamoto
,
T.
,
Furukawa
,
R.
, and
Okayama
,
K.
,
2016
, “
Dust-Loading Tests for Air Filters With Volcanic Ash
,” Geological Survey of Japan, AIST, Ibaraki, Japan, Report No. 629, pp.
1
26
.
21.
AESJ
,
2009
, “
Implementation Standard Concerning the Probabilistic Safety Assessment of Nuclear Power Plants Under Full-Power Operation (Level-1 PSA Edition): 2008
,” Atomic Energy Society of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, Standard No. AESJ-SC-P008: 2008.
22.
U.S. NRC
,
1983
, “
Handbook of Human Reliability Probability With Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications
,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C, Standard No.
NUREG/CR-1278
.https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0712/ML071210299.pdf
23.
Yamano
,
H.
,
Nishino
,
H.
, and
Kurisaka
,
K.
,
2016
, “
Development of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Methodology Against Extreme Snow for Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
308
(
11
), pp.
86
95
.
24.
Yamano
,
H.
,
Nishino
,
H.
,
Kurisaka
,
K.
,
Okano
,
Y.
,
Sakai
,
T.
,
Yamamoto
,
T.
,
Ishizuka
,
Y.
,
Geshi
,
N.
,
Furukawa
,
R.
,
Nanayama
,
F.
,
Takata
,
T.
, and
Azuma
,
E.
,
2015
, “
Development of Risk Assessment Methodology Against External Hazards for Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactors: Project Overview and Strong Wind PRA Methodology
,”
International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants
(
ICAPP
), Nice, France, May 3–6, Paper No. 15031.
25.
Nishino
,
H.
,
Kurisaka
,
K.
, and
Yamano
,
H.
,
2014
, “
Development of Margin Assessment Methodology of Decay Heat Removal Function Against External Hazards (2) Tornado PRA Methodology
,”
Tenth International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Thermal-Hydraulics, Operation and Safety (NUTHOS-10)
, Okinawa, Japan, Dec. 14–18, Paper No.
NUTHOS10-1068
.https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:47068869
You do not currently have access to this content.