Industry has been implementing condition monitoring (CM) for turbines to minimize losses and to improve productivity. Deficient conditions can be identified before losses occur by monitoring the equipment parameters. For any loss scenario, the effectiveness of monitoring depends on the stage of the loss scenario when the deficient condition is detected. A scenario-based semi-empirical methodology was developed to assess various types of condition monitoring techniques, by considering their effect on the risk associated with mechanical breakdown of steam turbines in the forest products (FPs) industry. A list of typical turbine loss scenarios was first generated by reviewing loss data and leveraging expert domain knowledge. Subsequently, condition monitoring techniques that can mitigate the risk associated with each loss scenario were identified. For each loss scenario, an event tree analysis (ETA) was used to quantitatively assess the variations in the outcomes due to condition monitoring, and resultant changes in the risk associated with turbine mechanical breakdown. An application was developed following the methodology to evaluate the effect of condition monitoring on turbine risk mitigation.

References

References
1.
Latcovich
,
J.
,
2013
, “
When Should You Do Your Next Major Turbine Outage?
,”
The Locomotive
,
The Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company
,
Hartford, CT
.
2.
Tanner
,
M.
,
2013
, “
Risk—What Does It Mean to Me?
,” Conduit,
16
(1).
3.
Carazas
,
F.
, and
Souza
,
G.
,
2009
, “
Availability Analysis of Gas Turbines Used in Power Plants
,”
Int. J. Thermodyn.
,
12
(
1
), pp.
28
37
.
4.
Fujiyama
,
K.
,
Nagai
,
S.
,
Akikuni
,
Y.
,
Fujiwara
,
T.
,
Furuya
,
K.
,
Matsumoto
,
S.
,
Takagi
,
K.
, and
Kawabata
,
T.
,
2004
, “
Risk-Based Inspection and Maintenance Systems for Steam Turbines
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
81
(10–11), pp.
825
835
.
5.
Krishnasamy
,
L.
,
Khan
,
F.
, and
Haddara
,
M.
,
2005
, “
Development of Risk-Based Maintenance (RBM) Strategy for a Power-Generating Plant
,”
J. Loss Prev. Process Ind.
,
18
(
2
), pp.
69
81
.
6.
Roemer
,
M. J.
, and
Kacprzynski
,
G. J.
,
2000
, “
Advanced Diagnostics and Prognostics for Gas Turbine Engine Risk Assessment
,” IEEE
Aerospace Conference
(
AERO
), Big Sky, MT, Mar. 18–25, pp.
345
353
.
7.
DePold
,
H. R.
, and
Gass
,
F. D.
,
1999
, “
The Application of Expert Systems and Neural Networks to Gas Turbine Prognostics and Diagnostics
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
121
(
4
), pp.
607
612
.
8.
Heng
,
A.
,
Zhang
,
S.
,
Tan
,
C. C.
, and
Math
,
J.
,
2009
, “
Rotating Machinery Prognostics: State of the Art, Challenges and Opportunities
,”
Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
,
23
(
3
), pp.
724
739
.
9.
Jardine
,
K. S.
,
2002
, “
Optimizing Condition Based Maintenance Decisions
,”
IEEE Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium
(
RAMS
), Seattle, WA, Jan. 28–31, pp. 90–97.
10.
Jardine
,
K. S.
,
Lin
,
D.
, and
Banjevic
,
D.
,
2006
, “
A Review on Machinery Diagnostics and Prognostics Implementing Condition-Based Maintenance
,”
Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
,
20
(
7
), pp.
1483
1510
.
11.
Zhou
,
B.
,
2016
, “
Powergen Gas Turbine Losses and Condition Monitoring-A Loss Data Based Study
,”
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst.
,
2
(
2
), p.
021007
.
12.
Clemens
,
P. L.
, and
Rodney
,
J. S.
,
1988
, “
System Safety and Risk Management
,” NIOSH Instructional Module, A Guide for Engineering Educators, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH, pp.
IX–3
IX–7
.
You do not currently have access to this content.