Organizations need to make decisions about risk acceptance, to decide about the need of risk-reducing measures. In this process, the personal judgments of occupational safety and health (OSH) practitioners have great importance. If on one hand, they have the technical knowledge about risk; on the other hand, the decisions can be dependent on their level of risk acceptance. This paper analyzes judgments of OSH practitioners about the level of risk acceptance, using the fuzzy logic approach. A questionnaire to analyze the reported level of risk acceptance was applied. The questionnaire included 79 risk scenarios, each accounting for the frequency of an accident with more lost workdays than a given magnitude. Through the two-step cluster analysis, three groups of OSH practitioners were identified: unacceptable, tolerable, and realistic groups. A further analysis of the realistic group judgments about risk was performed, using the fuzzy logic approach. The fuzzy sets of input and output variables were determined, and the relationship between the variables was mapped through fuzzy rules. After that, the min–max fuzzy inference method was used. The obtained results show that the risk level is acceptable when input variables are at the lowest value and unacceptable when the risk level is high. The obtained results allow us to better understand the modeling of OSH practitioners’ judgments about risk acceptance, noting the uncertainty related to these judgments.

References

References
1.
Rodrigues
,
M. A.
,
Arezes
,
P.
, and
Leão
,
C. P.
2014
, “
Risk Criteria in Occupational Environments: Critical Overview and Discussion
,”
Procedia Social Behav. Sci.
,
109
, pp.
257
262
.10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.455
2.
Renn
,
O.
,
1997
, “
The Role of Risk Perception for Risk Management
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
59
(
1
), pp.
49
62
.10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00119-1
3.
ISO
Risk Management—Principles and Guidelines
,”
International Organization for Standardization
, ISO 31000:2009.
4.
Pidgeon
,
N.
,
1998
, “
Risk Assessment, Risk Values and the Social Science Programme: Why We Do Need Risk Perception Research
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
59
(
1
), pp.
5
15
.10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00114-2
5.
Rodrigues
,
M. A.
,
Arezes
,
P.
, and
Leão
,
C. P.
,
2011
, “
Risk Acceptance Criteria Formulation in Furniture Industry: The Portuguese Reality
,”
ASME 2011 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE 2011
(Transportation Systems; Safety Engineering, Risk Analysis and Reliability Methods; Applied Stochastic Optimization, Uncertainty and Probability, Vol.
9
),
Nov. 2011
,
Denver, CO
, pp.
431
439
.
6.
Rodrigues
,
M. A.
,
Arezes
,
P.
, and
Leão
,
C. P.
,
2015
, “
Defining Risk Acceptance Criteria in Occupational Settings: A Case Study in the Furniture Industrial Sector
,”
Saf. Sci.
,
80
, pp.
288
295
.10.1016/j.ssci.2015.08.007
7.
Fischhoff
,
B.
,
Slovic
,
P.
,
Lichtenstein
,
S.
,
Read
,
S.
, and
Combs
,
B.
,
1978
, “
How Safe is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes Towards Technological Risks and Benefits
,”
Policy Sci.
,
9
(
2
), pp.
127
152
.10.1007/BF00143739
8.
Lima
,
M. L. P.
,
2005
, “Percepção de Riscos Ambientais,”
Contextos Humanos e Psicologia Ambiental
,
L.
Soczka
,
, ed.,
Fundação Calouste Gukbenkian
,
Lisboa, Portugal
.
9.
Boholm
,
A.
,
1998
, “
Comparative Studies of Risk Perception: A Review of Twenty Years of Research
,”
J. Risk Res.
,
1
(
2
), pp.
135
163
.10.1080/136698798377231
10.
Huijts
,
N. M. A.
,
Molina
,
E. J. E.
, and
Steg
,
L.
,
2012
, “
Psychological Factors Influencing Sustainable Energy Technology Acceptance: A Review-Based Comprehensive Framework
,”
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
,
16
(
1
), pp.
525
531
.10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.018
11.
Dubois
,
D.
,
Nguyen
,
H. T.
, and
Prade
,
H.
,
2000
, “Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets,”
The Handbooks of Fuzzy Sets Series
,
D.
Dubois
,
, and
H.
Prade
, eds.,
Springer Science+Business Media
,
New York
, Vol.
7
, pp.
343
438
.
12.
Peng-cheng
,
L.
,
Guo-hua
,
C.
,
Li-cao
,
D.
, and
Li
,
Z.
,
2010
, “
Fuzzy Logic-Based Approach for Identifying the Risk Importance of Human Error
,”
Saf. Sci.
,
48
(
7
), pp.
902
913
.10.1016/j.ssci.2010.03.012
13.
Guimaraes
,
A. C. F.
, and
Lapa
,
C. M. F.
,
2007
, “
Fuzzy Inference to Risk Assessment on Nuclear Engineering Systems
,”
Appl. Comput.
,
7
(
1
), pp.
17
28
.10.1016/j.asoc.2005.06.002
14.
Mamdani
,
E. H.
, and
Assilian
,
S.
,
1975
, “
An Experiment in Linguistic Synthesis With a Fuzzy Logic Controller
,”
Int. J. Man Mach. Stud.
,
7
(
1
), pp.
1
13
. 0020-737310.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2
15.
Rodrigues
,
M. A.
,
Arezes
,
P.
, and
Leão
,
C. P.
,
2013
, “Workers’Risk Acceptance Level in the Furniture Sector,”
Intelligent Systems and Decision Making for Risk Analysis and Crisis Response
,
C.
Huang
,
, and
C.
Kaharaman
, eds.,
Taylor & Francis
,
London
, pp.
631
-
636
.
16.
Burgman
,
M.
,
Fidler
,
F.
,
McBride
,
M.
,
Walshe
,
T.
, and
Wintle
,
B.
,
2006
,
Eliciting Expert Judgments: Literature Review
,
ACERA, University of Melbourne
,
Australia
.
You do not currently have access to this content.