In light of the 2011 Fukushima disaster, recent discussion has focused on finding the best nuclear storage options, maximizing the oversight power of global institutions, and strengthening safety measures. In addition to these, the development of dependable liability coverage that can be tapped in an emergency is also needed and should be considered thoughtfully. To succeed, financing is essential using special-purpose instruments from the global bond market, which is as big as US$175 trillion. Thus, in this paper, for the first time, a two-coverage-type trigger nuclear catastrophe (N-CAT) risk bond for potentially supplementing the covering of U.S. commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs) beyond the coverage per the Price Anderson Act as amended, and potentially other plants are proposed and designed worldwide. The N-CAT peril is categorized by three risk layers: incident, accident, and major accident. The pricing formula is derived by using a semi-Markovian dependence structure in continuous time. A numerical application illustrates the main findings of the paper.
Issue Section:
Research Papers
References
References
1.
European Nuclear Society
, 2015
, Nuclear Power Plants, World-Wide
, https://www.euronuclear.org/info/encyclopedia/n/nuclear-power-plant-world-wide.htm (Accessed on Apr. 29, 2016).2.
Ayyub
, B. M.
2003
, Risk Analysis in Engineering and Economics
, Chapman and Hall/CRC Press
, Boca Raton, FL
.3.
Balachandran
, G.
2010
, “The Civil Nuclear Liability Bill
,” Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA), Brief
, 26
, New Delhi, India
.4.
American Nuclear Insurers
, 2013
, Need for Foreign Nuclear Liability Insurance
, Glastonbury, CT
.5.
World Nuclear Association
, 2015
, Liability for Nuclear Damage
.6.
GAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office)
, 2004
, “Nuclear Regulation: NRC’s Liability Insurance Requirements for Nuclear Power Plants Owned by Limited Liability Companies
,” .7.
Friends of the Earth Europe
, 2007
, “Nuclear Industry: Face Your Demons Towards Full Liability for Nuclear Power Plant Operators
,” https://www.foeeurope.org/sites/default/files/publications/FoEE_Nuclear_Face_your_demons_1007.pdf (Accessed on Apr. 29, 2016).8.
Raju
, S.
Ramana
, M.
2010
, “The Other Side of Nuclear Liability
,” Econ. Political Weekly
, 45
(16
), p. 49
–54
.9.
Ayyub
, B. M.
Parker
, L.
2011
, “Financing Nuclear Liability
,” Science
, 334
(6062
), p. 1494
–1494
. 0036-807510.1126/science.334.6062.1494-a10.
Lund
, S.
Daruvala
, T.
Dobbs
, R.
Härle
, P.
Kwek
, J.-H.
Falcón
, R.
2013
, “Financial Globalization: Retreat or Reset?
,” McKinsey Global Institute
.11.
GAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office)
, 2002
, “Catastrophe Insurance Risks: The Role of Risk-Linked Securities and Factors Affecting Their Use
,” .12.
McGhee
, C.
Clarke
, R.
Fugit
, J.
Hathaway
, J.
2008
, “The Catastrophe Bond Market at Year-End 2007: The Market Goes Mainstream
,” Guy Carpenter & Company, LLC
, New York
.13.
Anger
, C.
Hum
, C.
2014
, “Catastrophe Bond Update: Fourth Quarter 2013
,” Guy Carpenter & Company, LLC
, New York
.14.
Cummins
, J. D.
2008
. “Cat Bonds and Other Risk-Linked Securities: State of the Market and Recent Developments
,” Risk Manage. Insurance Rev.
, 11
(1
), pp. 23
–47
.10.1111/rmir.2008.11.issue-115.
Hagedorn
, D.
Heigl
, C.
Mueller
, A.
Seidler
, G.
2009
, “Choice of Triggers,” The Handbook of Insurance-Linked Securities
, Wiley
, UK
, pp. 37
–48
.16.
Burnecki
, K.
Kukla
, G.
Taylor
, D.
2011
, “Pricing of Catastrophe Bonds,” Statistical Tools for Finance and Insurance
, Springer
, Berlin
, pp. 371
–391
.17.
Froot
, K. A.
2001
, “The Market for Catastrophe Risk: A Clinical Examination
,” J. Financial Econ.
, 60
(2
), pp. 529
–571
.18.
Cox
, S. H.
Pedersen
, H. W.
2000
, “Catastrophe Risk Bonds
,” North Am. Actuarial J.
, 4
(4
), pp. 56
–82
.10.1080/10920277.2000.1059593819.
Zimbidis
, A. A.
Frangos
, N. E.
Pantelous
, A. A.
2007
, “Modeling Earthquake Risk Via Extreme Value Theory and Pricing the Respective Catastrophe Bonds
,” ASTIN Bull.
, 37
(1
), pp. 163
–184
.10.2143/AST.37.1.202080420.
Shao
, J.
Pantelous
, A.
Papaioannou
, A. D.
2015
, “Catastrophe Risk Bonds With Applications to Earthquakes
,” Eur. Actuarial J.
, 5
(1
), pp. 113
–138
. 2190-973310.1007/s13385-015-0104-921.
Lee
, J.-P.
Yu
, M.-T.
2002
, “Pricing Default-Risky CAT Bonds With Moral Hazard and Basis Risk
,” J. Risk Insurance
, 69
(1
), pp. 25
–44
.10.1111/1539-6975.0000322.
Shao
, J.
Papaioannou
, A.
Pantelous
, A.
2016
, “Pricing and Simulating CAT Bonds in a Markov-Dependent Environment
,” Preprint
.23.
Ma
, Z.-G.
Ma
, C.-Q.
2013
, “Pricing Catastrophe Risk Bonds: A Mixed Approximation Method
,” Insurance: Math. Econ.
, 52
(2
), pp. 243
–254
.24.
IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency)
, 2013
, Ines: The International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale User’s Manual (2008 Edition)
, Vienna, Austria
.25.
Delbaen
, F.
Schachermayer
, W.
1994
, “A General Version of the Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing
,” Math. Ann.
, 300
(1
), pp. 463
–520
. 0025-583110.1007/BF0145049826.
Nowak
, P.
Romaniuk
, M.
2013
, “Pricing and Simulations of Catastrophe Bonds
,” Insurance: Math. Econ.
, 52
(1
), pp. 18
–28
.27.
Brigo
, D.
Mercurio
, F.
2007
, Interest Rate Models-Theory and Practice: With Smile, Inflation and Credit
, 2nd ed.
, Springer
, Berlin
.28.
Cox
, J. C.
Ingersoll
, Jr., J. E.
Ross
, S. A.
1985
, “A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates
,” Econometrica
, 53
(2
), pp. 385
–407
. 0098-169910.2307/191124229.
Griffith
, Jr. S. C.
Fain
, G. G.
Feinberg
, K. R.
Foley
, S. R.
Garrish
, T. J.
Kearney
, J. J.
Kennedy
, W. F.
Murphy
, A. W.
Rasmussen
, N. C.
Stahl
, R. W.
1900
, “Report to the Congress From the Presidential Commission on Catastrophic Nuclear Accidents
,” University of Michigan Library
, Ann Arbor, MI
.Copyright © 2016 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.
