Abstract

The modern idea of risk-informed decision-making (RIDM) is here critically examined for all existing, advanced and, generation-IV nuclear reactor systems. Motivated by the predictive difficulties of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) in regard to occurred accidents, it is evident that the real (not hypothetical) consequences of nuclear core damage accidents that must be considered and quantified are the financial losses, infrastructure damages, societal disruptions, and adverse political policies, and not solely the traditional exceedance of regulated radiation release or public exposure limits. With this perspective, a new dynamic analysis is presented for estimating the probability of core damage due to extended loss of power and cooling in a modern nuclear reactor, giving results different from current standardized PRA/PSA analyses. Using existing data, we approach the multitude of different events in a new way: whatever the initial event in the finite event set {external flood, fire, hurricane, ice storm, typhoon, earthquake, cyber attack…}, the fundamental concerns are the consequent loss and nonrestoration of power, and the inadequate cooling of the core. The present proposed quantitative evaluation uses applicable and fully “exchangeable” severe event data for nuclear and nonnuclear systems, including active and passive emergency back-up systems for a wide range of power losses that lead to widespread damage and societal disruption. While not design-specific, this new independent “order-of-magnitude” estimate for the probability of core damage is some two to two hundred times larger than that shown or reported in recent modern and formal PSA/PRA for licensing submissions using generic failure rate data rather than actual severe event data. This new finding suggests greater uncertainties exist than presently assumed for risk-informed decision-making (RIDM), and points to the need for a major reconsideration and updating of risk assessment and regulatory risk-informed approaches for nuclear plant safety evaluation.

References

1.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
,
2004
, “
Final Safety Evaluation Report Related to the Certification of the Economic Simplified Boiling-Water Reactor Standard Design
,”
ADAMS
,
Washington, DC
, Report No. NUREG-1966.
2.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
,
2007
, “
Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants
,”
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
,
Washington, DC
, Report No. NUREG-0800.
3.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC),
2020
, “
Acceptability of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Results for Risk-Informed Activities, Draft Regulatory Guide 1.200 Revision 3
,”
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
,
Washington, DC
, Access No. #ML19308B636.
4.
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC)
,
2008
, “
Design of New Nuclear Power Plants
,”
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
,
Ottawa, ON, Canada
, Report No. RD-337.
5.
Generation IV International Forum (GIF)
,
2011
, “
An Integrated Safety Assessment Methodology (ISAM) for Generation IV Nuclear Systems, Version 1.1
,” Generation IV International Forum, Report No. GIF/RSWG/2010/002/rev1.
6.
Generation IV International Forum (GIF)
,
2014
, “
Guidance Document for Integrated Safety Assessment Methodology (ISAM) – (GDI), European Commission Joint Research Centre Report for GIF Risk and Safety Working Group, Version 1.0
,”
Generation IV International Forum
, Report No. GIF/RSWG/2014/001.
7.
Apostolakis
,
G.
,
Lui
,
C.
,
Cunningham
,
M.
,
Pangburn
,
G.
,
Reckely
,
W.
,
Adams
,
J.
,
Call
,
M.
,
Damon
,
D.
,
Easton
,
E.
,
McCartin
,
T.
,
Mizuno
,
G.
, and
Piper
,
J.
,
2012
, “
A Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework
,”
NRC Risk Management Task Force
,
Washington, DC
, Report No. NUREG-2150, p.
318
.
8.
President's National Infrastructure Advisory Council (NIAC),
2018
, “
Surviving a Catastrophic Power Outage
,”
National Infrastructure Advisory Council
,
Washington, DC
, accessed Nov. 2020, www.dhs.gov/national-infrastructure-advisory-council
9.
Western European Nuclear Regulators Association,
2009
, “
Safety Objectives for New Power Reactors
,”
Western European Nuclear Regulators Association
, p. 30, accessed Dec. 2009, http://www.wenra.org/harmonisation/reactor-harmonisation-working-group
10.
Western European Nuclear Regulators Association,
2013
, “
Safety of New Reactor Designs
,”
Western European Nuclear Regulators Association
, p. 52, accessed Dec. 2009, http://www.wenra.org/harmonisation/reactor-harmonisation-working-group
11.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
,
2019
, “
Regulatory Guide RG 1.226 and U.S. Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 154/Friday, August 9/Rules and Regulations 10CFR50.155
,” United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
12.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
,
2016
, “
Mitigation of Beyond-Design Basis Events and Associated Regulatory Guidance
,”
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
,
Washington, DC
, Report No. SECY-16-0142.15.
13.
Westinghouse
,
2004
, “
Design Reference AP1000 Design Control Document (DCD)
,” Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, Report No. APP-GW-GL-700.
14.
Barr
,
J.
,
Basu
,
S.
,
Esmaili
,
H.
, and
Stutzke
,
M.
,
2018
, “
Technical Basis for Containment Protection and Release Reduction Rulemaking for BWRs
,”
U.S. NRC, ONRR
,
Washington, DC
, Report No. NUREG-2206.
15.
Bhatt
,
S. C.
, and
Wachowiak
,
R. M.
,
2006
, “
ESBWR Certification Probabilistic Risk Assessment
,”
General Electric Energy Nuclear
,
Wilmington, NC
, Report No. NEDO 33201.
16.
General Electric Company (GE)
,
2014
, “Certification of the World's Safest Reactor Paves Way for Commercial Deployment in the U.S. and Worldwide,”
General Electric Company
,
Wilmington, NC
.
17.
Duffey
,
R. B.
,
2019a
, “
Power Restoration Prediction Following Extreme Events and Disasters
,”
Int J. Disaster Risk Sci.
,
10
(
1
), pp.
134
148
.10.1007/s13753-018-0189-2
18.
NuScale
,
2020
, “
Standard Plant Design Certification Application
,”
NuScale
,
Washington, DC
, Part 2 Tier 2, Rev5 Chap. 19, NRC on-line access # ML20224A508.
19.
Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)
,
2012
, “
Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX) Implementation Guide
,”
Nuclear Energy Institute
,
Washington, DC
, Report NEI 12-06 [Draft Rev. 0].
20.
Apostolakis
,
G.
,
1990
, “
The Concept of Probability in Safety Assessments of Technological Systems
,”
Science
,
250
(
4986
), pp.
1359
1364
.10.1126/science.2255906
21.
Farmer
,
F. R.
,
1967
, “
Siting Criteria-A New Approach
,”
Proceedings Symposium on Containment and Siting
, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, Apr. 3–7, Paper No. SM-89/34, pp.
303
324
.https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:44077180
22.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
,
2010
, “
Risk-Informed Decision Making Handbook, Version 1.0 April, Office of Safety and Mission Assurance
,”
NASA
,
Washington, DC
, Report No. NASA/SP-2010-576.
23.
United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana
,
2010
, “
Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico on April 20
,” United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA.
24.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (U.S. FEMA),
2019
,
Guidance for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping: Dams/Reservoirs and Non-Dam Features
,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
,
Washington, DC
, Document 101.
25.
McCann
,
M. W.
, and
Lundqwist
,
B. A.
,
2017
, “
Development of F-N Curves for Public Safety Risks Associated With Dam Failures in the U.S
,”
Proceedings of Association of State Dam Safety Officials Annual Conference
, Association of State Dam Safety Officials, Inc., San Antonio, Lexington, KY
, Sept. 10–14
.
26.
U.S. Department of Treasury,
2021
, “
Financial Report of the United States Government
,”
Department of the Treasury
,
Washington, DC
.
27.
Department of Energy (U.S. DoE),
2016
, “
Resilience of the U.S. Electricity System: A Multi-Hazard Perspective, Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis (EPSA) with Participation of Six Laboratories (ANL, BNL, LANL, ORNL, PNWL, and SNL)
,” U.S. DoE, Washington, DC, p.
46
.
28.
Duffey
,
R. B.
, and
Saull
,
J. W.
,
2008
,
Managing Risk: The Human Element
,
Wiley
,
Chichester, UK
.
29.
Duffey
,
R. B.
,
2020
, Learning About Risk: Life, Death …and Money, Independent.
30.
Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI
),
2018
, “
Risk-Informed Performance-Based Guidance for Non-Light Water Reactor Licensing Basis Development
,”
Nuclear Energy Institute
,
Washington, DC
, Report No.
18
04
.
31.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (U.S. FEMA)
,
2011
, “
Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology (HAZU.S.-MH)
,”
Federal Emergency Management Agency
,
Washington, DC
.
32.
Loggins
,
R.
,
Little
,
R. G.
,
Mitchell
,
J.
,
Sharkey
,
T.
, and
Wallace
,
W. A.
,
2019
, “
CRISIS: Modeling the Restoration of Interdependent Civil and Social Infrastructure Systems Following an Extreme Event
,”
Nat. Hazards Rev.
,
20
(
3
), pp. 04019004-1–04019004-21.10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000326
33.
Hawking
,
S.
,
2014
,
The Universe in a Nutshell
,
Bantam Books, New York,
Chap.
2
.
34.
D'Auria
,
F.
,
Debrecin
,
N.
, and
Glaeser
,
H.
,
2019
, “
The Technological Challenge for Current Generation Nuclear Reactors
,”
Nucl. Energy Technol.
,
5
(
3
), pp.
183
199
.10.3897/nucet.5.38117
35.
Mandelli
,
D.
,
Alfonsi
,
A.
,
Wang
,
C.
,
Zhegang
,
M.
,
Parisi
,
C.
,
Aldemir
,
T.
,
Smith
,
C.
, and
Youngblood
,
R.
,
2020
, “
Mutual Integration of Classical and Dynamic PRA
,”
Nucl. Tech.
, pp.
1
13
.10.1080/00295450.2020.1776030
36.
NEA/CSNI
,
2015
, “
Benchmark Study of the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (BSAF Project)
, Phase I Summary Report, R(2015)18,”
NEA/CSNI
, Paris Cedex, France, accessed Feb. 21, 2024, www.oecd-nea.org
37.
Engler
,
J.-O.
,
2020
, “
Global and Regional Probabilities of Major Nuclear Reactor Accidents
,”
J. Environ. Manage.
,
269
, p.
110780
.10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110780
38.
Rose
,
T.
, and
Sweeting
,
T.
,
2016
, “
How Safe is Nuclear Power? A Statistical Study Suggests Less Than Expected
,”
Bull. At. Sci.
,
72
(
2
), pp.
112
115
.10.1080/00963402.2016.1145910
39.
Wheatley
,
S.
,
Sovacool
,
B.
, and
Sornette
,
D.
,
2017
, “
Of Disasters and Dragon Kings: A Statistical Analysis of Nuclear Power Incidents and Accidents
,”
Risk Analy.
, 37, pp.
99
115
.10.1111/risa.12587
40.
Sornette
,
D.
,
2009
, “
Dragon-Kings, Black Swans and the Prediction of Crises
,”
Int. J. Terraspace Sci. Eng.
,
2
(
1
), pp.
1
18
.10.2139/ssrn.1596032
41.
Sornette
,
D.
, and
Ouillon
,
G.
,
2012
, “
Dragon-Kings: Mechanisms, Statistical Methods and Empirical Evidence
,”
Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.
,
205
(
1
), pp.
1
26
.10.1140/epjst/e2012-01559-5
42.
Duffey
,
R. B.
,
2020b
, “
Predicting Power System Reliability and Outage Duration Including Emergency Response
,”
Dependability
,
20
(
3
), pp.
3
14
.10.21683/1729-2646-2020-20-3-3-14
43.
Duffey
,
R. B.
,
2021
, “
Record Flooding Risk and Power Outage Restoration
,”
J. Civ. Eng. Archit.
,
15
(
3
), pp.
128
145
.10.17265/1934-7359/2021.03.002
44.
Heathcote
,
A.
,
Brown
,
S.
, and
Mewhort
,
D. J. K.
,
2000
, “
The Power Law Repealed; the Case for an Exponential Law of Practice
,”
Psychonmetric Bull Rev.
,
7
(
2
), pp.
185
207
.10.3758/BF03212979
45.
Cooper
,
S.
, and
Franklin
,
C.
,
2020
, “
Applying HRA to FLEX-Using IDHAES-ECA Volume 2
,”
NRC
,
Washington, DC
, Report No. RIL
2020
13
.
46.
Park
,
J.
,
Boring
,
R. L.
, and
Ulrich
,
T. A.
,
2022
, “
An Approach to Dynamic Human Reliability Analysis Using EMRALD Dynamic Risk Assessment Tool
,”
Proceedings of American Nuclear Society Conference PSAM 16, Honolulu, Hawaii, Report No. INL/CON-22-67065.
47.
Apostolakis
,
G.
,
2014
, “
Global Statistics vs. PRA Results: Which Should we Use?
,” American Nuclear Society, Raleigh, NC
.
48.
Apostolakis
,
G.
,
2016
, “
A Perspective on the Use of Risk Information
,”
Proc PSAM 13, Am Nucl Soc
, Seoul, Korea, Oct. 3.
49.
Degonish
,
M. M.
,
2022
, “
FLEX Equipment Data Collection and Analysis
,”
PWR Owners Group, Westinghouse Electric Corp
.,
Cranberry, PA
, Report No. PWROG-18042-NP.
50.
Eide
,
S. A.
,
Wierman
,
T. E.
,
Gentillon
,
C. D.
,
Rasmuson
,
D. M.
, and
Atwood
,
C. L.
,
2007
, “
Industry-Average Performance for Components and Initiating Events at U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants
,”
Nuclear Regulatory Research NRC
,
Washington, DC
, Report No. NUREG/CR-6928.
51.
Swain
,
A. D.
, and
Guttman
,
H. E.
,
1983
, “
Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis With Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications
,”
U.S. NRC
,
Washington, DC
, Report No. NUREG/CR-1278.
52.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS),
2018
, “
Strengthening the Cyber Security of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure, Section 2(e): Assessment of Electricity Disruption Incident Response Capabilities
,” accessed Feb. 22, 2024, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/05/16/2017-10004/strengthening-the-cybersecurity-of-federal-networks-and-critical-infrastructure
53.
Lee
,
R. M.
,
Assante
,
M. J.
,
Conway
,
T.
,
2016
, “
Analysis of the Cyber Attack on the Ukrainian Power Grid: Defense Use Case
,”
E-ISAC, Electricity Information Sharing and Analysis Center, Industrial Control Systems
,
Washington, DC
, accessed Feb. 22, 2024, https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/sites/default/files/documents/3891751/SANS-and-Electricity-Information-Sharing-and.pdf
54.
Siu
,
N.
,
Stutzke
,
M.
,
Dennis
,
S.
, and
Harrison
,
D.
,
2016
, “
Probabilistic Risk Assessment
,”.
55.
Jaynes
,
E. T.
,
2003
,
Probability Theory: The Logic of Science
,
G. L.
Bretthorst
, ed.,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
56.
Niepert
,
M.
, and
Domingos
,
P.
,
2014
, “
Exchangeable Variable Models
,”
Proceedings of 31st Conference on Machine Learning
,
Beijing, China
, arXiv: 1405.0501v1, 2 May, JMLR:W&CP Vol. 32.
57.
Cordnai
,
L. K.
,
Wechsler
,
S.
,
2006
, “
Teaching Independence and Exchangeability
,” Proc. ICOTS-7, accessed Feb. 22, 2024, https://iase-web.org/documents/papers/icots7/3I1_CORD.pdf
58.
U.S. CFR
,
2017
, “
U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (2017)
, Conditions of Licenses,” U.S. CFR, Washington, DC.
59.
Westinghouse Electric Corporation
,
2004
, “
AP1000: Passive Safety Systems and Timeline for Station Blackout
,” Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, Report No. APP-GW-GL-700, accessed Feb. 22, 2024, https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0507/ML050750282.pdf
60.
Romain
,
M. O.
,
Stokes
,
E. C.
,
Shrestha
,
R.
,
Zhuosen
,
W.
,
Schultz
,
L.
,
Sepulveda Carlo
,
E. A.
,
Qingsong
,
S.
,
Bell
,
J.
,
Molthan
,
A.
,
Kal
,
V.
,
Chuanyi
,
J.
,
Seto
,
K. C.
,
McClain
,
S. N.
, and Enenkel, M., 2019, “Satellite-Based Assessment of Electricity Restoration Efforts in Puerto Rico After Hurricane Maria,”
PLoS ONE
, 14(6), p. e0218883.10.1371/journal.pone.0218883
61.
Duffey
,
R. B.
,
2019b
, “
The Risk of Extended Power Loss and the Probability of Emergency Restoration for Severe Events and Nuclear Accidents
,”
ASME J. Nuc. Eng. Rad. Sci.
,
5
(
3
), p. 031601.10.1115/1.4042970
62.
Murphy
,
S.
,
Apt
,
J.
,
Moura
,
J.
, and
Sowell
,
F.
,
2017
, “
Resource Adequacy Risks to the Bulk Power System of North America
,”
Appl. Energy
,
212
, pp.
1360
1376
.10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.097
63.
U.S. ACE
,
2006
, “
Performance Evaluation of the New Orleans and Southeast Louisiana Hurricane Protection System
,” Volumes I to VIII, Engineering and Operational Risk and Reliability Analysis, Interagency Performance Evaluation Task Force, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC.
64.
TEPCO,
2012
, “
Fukushima Nuclear Accident Analysis Report
,”
Tokyo Electric Power Company Inc., and Japanese Government Report to IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety
,
Vienna, Austria
.
65.
Gentillon
,
C.
,
Atwood
,
C. L.
,
Mack
,
A. L.
, and
Ma
,
Z.
,
2020
, “
Evaluation of Weakly Informed Priors for FLEX Data
,”
Idaho National Laboratory
,
Idaho Falls, ID
, Report No. INL/EXT-20-58327.
66.
Pioro
,
I.
,
Duffey
,
R. B.
,
Kirillov
,
P. L.
, and
Dort-Goltz
,
N.
,
2020
, “
Current Status of Reactors Deployment and Small Modular Reactors Development in the World
,”
ASME J. Nucl. Energy Rad. Sci.
,
6
, p.
044001
1
.10.1115/1.4047927
67.
UK HSE,
2008
, “
New Reactor Build: Westinghouse AP 1000 Step 2 PSA Assessment
,”
Health and Safety Executive, Nuclear Directorate, Nuclear Installations Inspectorate
,
Bootle, UK
.
68.
EPRI, U.S. DOE and U.S. NRC
,
2012
, “
Central and Eastern United States Seismic Source Characterization for Nuclear Facilities
,” EPRI, Washington, DC, Report No. EPRI 1021097, DOE DOE/NE-0140, NRC NUREG-2115.
69.
Duffey
,
R. B.
, and
Ha
,
T.-S.
,
2010
, “
Human Reliability: Benchmark and Prediction
,”
Proc. I. Mech Eng, Part O: J Risk Reliab.
,
224
(
3
), pp.
185
196
.10.1243/1748006XJRR307
You do not currently have access to this content.