Graphical Abstract Figure

Tubing failure diagram.

Graphical Abstract Figure

Tubing failure diagram.

Close modal

Abstract

With increasing wellbore depth, the environmental conditions become progressively more severe, characterized by elevated temperatures and pressures. Consequently, the pressure variations within the well induced by Tubing Conveyed Perforation (TCP) operations exhibit a more pronounced intensity. These nonlinear pressure fluctuations generate significant impact loads at the bottom of the perforating gun, which can cause failure of the perforating tubing. A transient nonlinear pressure field model of perforation explosion was established based on hydraulic-mechanical coupling to effectively control the risk of accidents. The model considers the effects of several hundred perforation charges and their precise placement in relation to blind holes, thus taking into account the impact of shot density. As a result, the model more accurately reflects actual field conditions. The study investigated the evolution of nonlinear pressure fields at different positions of the entire tubing under perforation explosion and analyzed the influence of different factors on nonlinear pressure fluctuations at the bottom of the perforating gun. The results showed that the peak pressure of the perforation section was much higher than that of the tubing section and the rathole section, maintaining at approximately 200 MPa. The pressure wave attenuated to the initial wellbore pressure of about 80 MPa only seven meters away from the perforation section center. The peak pressure at the bottom of the perforating gun was positively correlated with the initial wellbore pressure, perforating fluid density, shot density, and quantity of explosive. When the explosive mass was the same, RDX explosive in RDX, HMX, HNS, and TNT caused the largest peak pressure at the bottom of the perforating gun, with TNT causing the smallest. These results provided guidance for the prediction of TCP wellbore nonlinear pressure fluctuation.

References

1.
Baumann
,
C.
,
Damm
,
D.
,
Escudero
,
J.
,
Smart
,
M.
,
Yang
,
X. T.
,
Liu
,
J. Y.
, and
Wei
,
Z.
,
2019
, “
New Low-Shock Low-Debris Gun Technology With Reliable Gunshock Simulation and Optimization
,” Proceedings of the IPTC,
Beijing, China
, Mar. 26–28, Paper No.
IPTC-19376-MS
.10.2523/IPTC-19376-MS
2.
Schatz
,
J. F.
,
Haney
,
B. L.
, and
Ager
,
S. A.
,
1999
, “
High-Speed Downhole Memory Recorder and Software Used to Design and Confirm Perforating/Propellant Behavior and Formation Fracturing
,” Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,
Houston, TX
, Oct. 3–6, Paper No.
SPE-56434-MS
.10.2118/56434-MS
3.
Gilliat
,
J.
,
Bale
,
D.
,
Satti
,
R.
,
Li
,
C.
, and
Howard
,
J.
,
2014
, “
The Importance of Pre-Job Shock Modeling as a Risk Mitigation Tool in TCP Operations
,” Proceedings of the SPE Deepwater Drilling and Completions Conference,
Galveston, TX
, Sept. 10–11, Paper No.
SPE-170260-MS
.10.2118/170260-MS
4.
Gao
,
Y.
,
Wang
,
S.
,
Wang
,
X.
,
Liu
,
Z. Y.
,
Guo
,
S. S.
, and
Tang
,
J. J.
,
2016
, “
Assessment Packer in Safety Distance
,”
Well Logging Technol.
,
40
(
3
), pp.
382
384
.
5.
Zhang
,
Q.
,
Liao
,
T.
,
Ding
,
L. L.
,
Wang
,
K.
,
Yang
,
H. X.
, and
Lian
,
Z. H.
,
2023
, “
Study on Water Hammer Effect and Tubing String Vibration in High-Pressure High-Production Gas Wells[J]
,”
Geoenergy Sci. Eng.
,
229
, p.
212147
.10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212147
6.
Deng
,
Q.
,
Zhang
,
H.
,
Li
,
J.
,
Hou
,
X. J.
, and
Wang
,
H.
,
2019
, “
Study of Downhole Shock Loads for Ultra-Deep Well Perforation and Optimization Measures
,”
Energies
,
12
(
14
), p.
2743
.10.3390/en12142743
7.
Deng
,
Q.
,
Zhang
,
H.
,
Chen
,
A.
,
Li
,
J.
,
Hou
,
X. J.
, and
Wang
,
H.
,
2020
, “
Effects of Perforation Fluid Movement on Downhole Packer With Shock Loads
,”
J. Petrol. Sci. Eng.
,
195
, p.
107566
.10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107566
8.
Liu
,
J.
,
Li
,
S. D.
,
Liu
,
Q. Y.
,
Liu
,
X.
,
Guo
,
X. Q.
, and
He
,
Y. F.
,
2017
, “
Study on Dynamic Response of Downhole Tools Under Perforation Impact Load
,”
Shock Vib.
,
1
(
1
), pp.
1
10
.10.1155/2017/5054343
9.
Liu
,
J.
,
Guo
,
X.
,
Liu
,
Z.
,
Liu
,
X.
, and
Liu
,
Q.
,
2019
, “
Pressure Field Investigation Into Oil & Gas Wellbore During Perforating Shaped Charge Explosion
,”
J. Petrol. Sci. Eng.
,
172
, pp.
1235
1247
.10.1016/j.petrol.2018.09.068
10.
Liu
,
X.
,
Li
,
J.
,
Yang
,
H.
,
Liu
,
G.
,
Lian
,
W.
,
Wang
,
B.
, and
Zhang
,
G.
,
2022
, “
A New Investigation on Optimization of Perforation Key Parameters Based on Physical Experiment and Numerical Simulation
,”
Energy Rep.
,
8
, pp.
13997
14008
.10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.051
11.
Chen
,
F.
,
Chen
,
H. B.
,
Tang
,
K.
, and
Ren
,
G. H.
,
2010
, “
Influence of Perforating Impact Load on the Operating String and the Countermeasures
,”
Nat. Gas Ind.
,
30
(
5
), pp.
61
65
.
12.
Baumann
,
C. E.
, and
Oden
,
J. T.
,
1999
, “
A Discontinuous hp Finite Element Method for Convection-Diffusion Problems
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
175
(
3–4
), pp.
311
341
.10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00359-4
13.
Baumann
,
C. E.
, and
Oden
,
J. T.
,
2000
, “
An Adaptive-Order Discontinuous Galerkin Method for the Solution of the Euler Equations of Gas Dynamics
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
,
47
(
1–3
), pp.
61
73
.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000110/30)47:1/3<61::AID-NME761>3.0.CO;2-D
14.
Bale
,
D.
,
Satti
,
R.
, and
Ji
,
M.
,
2016
, “
A Next-Generation Shock-Capturing, Multi-Phase Flow Simulator for Perforating Applications in HPHT Environment
,” Proceedings of the SPE Deepwater Drilling & Completions Conference,
Galveston, TX
, Sept. 14–15, Paper No.
SPE-180283-MS
.10.2118/180283-MS
15.
Baumann
,
C. E.
, and
Brinsden
,
M. S.
,
2014
, “
Perforating Gunshock Loads: Simulation and Optimization
,” Proceedings of the IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference,
Bangkok, Thailand
, Aug. 25–27, Paper No.
SPE-170552-MS
.10.2118/170552-MS
16.
Li
,
C. B.
,
Xiong
,
J.
, and
Ma
,
M. Y.
,
2011
, “
Theoretical and Experimental Research on Perforation Remnant Energy
,”
Adv. Manuf. Syst.
,
339
, pp.
379
385
.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.339.379
17.
Li
,
C. B.
, and
Ma
,
M. Y.
,
2012
, “
Numerical Computation of Wellbore Dynamic Pressure During Perforating
,”
Proceedings of the 2012 Fourth International Conference on Computational and Information Sciences
,
Chongqing
,
China
, Aug. 17–19.10.1109/ICCIS.2012.192
18.
Li
,
C. B.
,
Liang
,
Y.
, and
Lou
,
Z. K.
,
2013
, “
Engineering Calculation and Application of Perforation Impact Dynamic Loads in Oil and Gas Well
,”
Adv. Manuf. Syst.
,
834-836
, pp.
1308
1312
.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.834-836.1308
19.
Ding
,
L. L.
,
Chen
,
W. K.
,
Han
,
C. J.
,
Xue
,
Y. Z.
, and
Lei
,
Q. S.
,
2024
, “
Study on Explosion Energy Conversion of a Perforating Shaped Charge During Perforation Detonation
,”
SPE J.
,
29
(
6
), pp.
2938
2952
.10.2118/219473-PA
20.
Ding
,
L. L.
,
Lei
,
Q. S.
,
Chen
,
W. K.
,
Xue
,
Y. Z.
, and
Zhang
,
Q.
, “
Study on Transient Energy Transformation and Factor During Perforation Explosion
,”
China Saf. Sci. J.
,
33
(
9
), pp.
76
85
.http://www.cssjj.com.cn/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.09.0223
21.
Wei
,
Q.
, and
Jones
,
N.
,
1992
, “
A Failure Criterion for Beams Under Impulsive Loading
,”
Int. J. Impact Eng.
,
12
(
1
), pp.
101
121
.10.1016/0734-743X(92)90359-2
22.
Umbrello
,
D.
,
M’Saoubi
,
R.
, and
Outeiro
,
J. C.
,
2007
, “
The Influence of Johnson-Cook Material Constants on Finite Element Simulation of Machining of AISI 316 L Steel
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tool Manuf.
,
47
(
3–4
), pp.
462
470
.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.06.006
23.
Babu
,
V.
,
Kulkarni
,
K. B.
,
Kankanalapalli
,
S.
, and
Khatib-Shahid
,
B.
,
2018
, “
Comparative Analysis of Occupant Responses Between LS-DYNA® Arbitrary LaGrange in Euler and (ALE) and Structured - ALE (SALE) Methods
,”
Proceedings of the 15th International LS-DYNA Users Conference
, Detroit, MI, June 10–12.https://ftp.lstc.com/anonymous/outgoing/hao/sale/tutorials/08-B_FSI-ALE_041.pdf
24.
Cole
,
R. H.
,
1948
,
Underwater Explosions
,
Princeton University Press
,
Princeton, NJ
, pp.
10
50
.
25.
Katayama
,
M.
,
Kibe
,
S.
, and
Yamamoto
,
T.
,
2001
, “
Numerical and Experimental Study on the Shaped Charge for Space Debris Assessment
,”
Acta Astronaut.
,
48
(
5–12
), pp.
363
372
.10.1016/S0094-5765(01)00073-X
You do not currently have access to this content.