Abstract

In probabilistic risk assessment against earthquakes for nuclear power plants, developing a realistic response analysis method for the fragility assessment of piping systems considering input seismic motions exceeding the design assumptions is important. Piping systems typically exhibit complex three-dimensional shapes, and the arrangement and stiffness of the piping support structures significantly affect the response characteristics of the entire piping system. Therefore, developing a realistic response analysis method for piping systems, including support structures is necessary. In this study, a method is proposed for modeling the elastoplastic hysteresis characteristics of piping support structures to establish a seismic response analysis method for piping systems, including support structures. First, the authors propose an elastoplastic spring model that can express the elastoplastic hysteresis characteristics of a piping support structure. Subsequently, using this model, the authors perform a simulation analysis for the loading test of a piping support structure. The analysis and test results correlated well, confirming the effectiveness of the proposal of the model. The main contents, including the proposal of the elastoplastic spring model, the simulation analysis of the loading test, and the comparison between the analysis solutions and the test results, are reported in this paper.

References

1.
Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA),
2013
, “
Operational Guide for the Safety Enhancement Assessment of Commercial Power Reactors
,” NRA, Japan, accessed Dec. 18, 2022, https://www.nra.go.jp/data/000069245.pdf
2.
Shirai
,
E.
,
Eto
,
K.
,
Umemoto
,
A.
,
Yoshii
,
T.
,
Kondo
,
M.
,
Shimizu
,
H.
, and
Tai
,
K.
,
2008
, “
Inelastic Seismic Test of the Small-Bore Piping and Support System (Part 2: Static Failure Test for Piping Support Equipment)
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2008-61351.10.1115/PVP2008-61351
3.
Nakamura
,
I.
,
Watakabe
,
T.
,
Otani
,
A.
,
Shibutani
,
T.
,
Morishita
,
M.
, and
Shiratori
,
M.
,
2019
, “
Benchmark Analyses of Elastic-Plastic Seismic Response Evaluation of Piping Systems
,”
Technical Note of the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience
, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience (NIED), Tsukuba, Japan, Report No. Vol.
429.
4.
Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers (JSME)
,
2019
, “
Design and Construction Standards for Nuclear Power Plants for Power Generation Case Standard, Alternative Provisions for Seismic Design of Seismic Class S Piping Based on Elasto-Plastic Response Analysis
,” Report No. NC-CC-008.
5.
Shirai
,
E.
,
Yamada
,
T.
,
Ikeda
,
K.
,
Yoshii
,
T.
,
Kondo, Okamoto
,
H.
, and
Tai
,
K.
,
2010
, “
Seismic Design Margin of the Piping and Support System (Part 1: Static Loading Test of the Support)
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2010-2539210.1115/PVP2010-25392.
6.
Shimazu
,
R.
, and
Sakai
,
M.
,
2018
, “
Ultimate Limit States of Piping Supports With Outer Diagonal Brace Under High Acceleration Sinusoidal Shaking Condition
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2018-84937.10.1115/PVP2018-84937
7.
Takahashi
,
T.
, and
Maekawa
,
A.
,
2012
, “
Seismic Response Reduction in Piping Systems Using Plastic Deformation of Pipe Support Structures
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2012-78052.10.1115/PVP2012-78052
8.
Endo
,
R.
,
Murota
,
M.
,
Kawahata
,
J.-I.
,
Sato
,
T.
,
Mekomoto
,
Y.
,
Takayama
,
Y.
,
Kobayashi
,
H.
, and
Hirose
,
J.
,
1993
, “
The Development of Design Method of Nuclear Piping System Supported by Elasto-Plastic Support Structures (Part 1)
,”
Transactions of the 12th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 12)
, Stuttgard, Germany, Aug. 15–20, pp.
193
198
.https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:36032964
9.
Endo
,
R.
,
Murota
,
M.
,
Kawahata
,
J.-I.
,
Sato
,
T.
,
Hirose
,
J.
, and
Mekomoto
,
Y.
,
1995
, “
The Development of Design Method of Nuclear Piping System Supported by Elasto-Plastic Support Structures (Part 2)
,” Transactions of the 13th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (
SMiRT 13
), Porto Alegre, Brazil, Aug. 13–18, pp.
459
464
.https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:27053991
10.
Nardin
,
C.
,
Bursi
,
O. S.
,
Paolacci
,
F.
,
Pavese
,
A.
, and
Quinci
,
G.
,
2022
, “
Experimental Performance of a Multi‐Storey Braced Frame Structure With Non‐Structural Industrial Components Subjected to Synthetic Ground Motions
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
,
51
(
9
), pp.
2113
2136
.10.1002/eqe.3656
11.
Japan Electric Association (JEA)
,
2008
, “
Technical Regulations for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants
,” Japan Electric Association (JEA), Yurakucho, Japan, Report No. JEAC 4601–2008.
12.
Takito
,
K.
,
Okuda
,
Y.
,
Nishida
,
A.
, and
Li
,
Y.
,
2023
, “
Development of Seismic Response Analysis Method of Piping System: Proposal of the Nonlinear Spring Model for Piping Support Structures
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2023-108029.10.1115/PVP2023-108029
13.
Sakai
,
M.
,
Shiogama
,
Y.
,
Nishida
,
A.
,
Araya
,
F.
, and
Kushida
,
N.
,
2008
, “
Hybrid Seismic Response Tests Focusing on the Support Structure Part of Equipment Piping System
,”
2008 Autumn Meeting of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan (AESJ)
, Kami, Japan, Paper No. A15, p.
1
.
14.
Okuda
,
Y.
,
Nishida
,
A.
,
Sakai
,
M.
,
Shiogama
,
Y.
, and
Li
,
Y.
,
2021
, “
Hybrid Dynamic Response Test Focusing on The Support Structure of Piping Systems
,”
ASME
Paper No. ICONE28-64586.10.1115/ICONE28-64586
15.
Dassault Systèms S.E.
,
2016
, “
Abaqus Analysis User's Guide Vol. 3: Materials
,” Dassault Systèms S.E, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France.
16.
Newmark
,
N. M.
, and
Hall
,
W. J.
,
1978
, “
Development of Criteria for Seismic Review of Selected Nuclear Power Plants
,” Report No. NUREG/CR-0098.
You do not currently have access to this content.