Abstract

This study is an industrial case study for the application of a validated flashing and hydraulic shock modeling approach to the safety and design of a reactor blow line. The maximum flowrate is important for sizing of downstream components. The high pressure of the blow and flashing of the liquid can result in significant forces on pipe bends and other geometrical features. Analysis and prediction of such forces are of importance for the structural design and anchoring of the piping. Another concern for a liquid blow under high pressure is the potential for condensation-induced hydraulic shock. The collapse of the flashed vapor to the liquid phase creating shock waves of large amplitudes is a serious safety concern. The computational fluid dynamics model used the homogeneous mixture model with a flashing model for phase change of the fluid. The properties of the fluid were defined by a custom function which interpolated between tabulated values of the thermodynamic and transport properties. The simulations predicted the occurrence of a condensation hydraulic shock when the blow down is initiated with empty pipes and demonstrated that a hydraulic shock could be prevented with liquid-filled condition. The pipework geometry was also optimized to reduce the forces acting at the junctions. The vapor quality at the outlet as a result of flashing was estimated, which is necessary for the design of downstream systems.

References

1.
Liu
,
S.
,
Li
,
S.
, and
Wu
,
Y.
,
2009
, “
Pressure Fluctuation Prediction of a Model Kaplan Turbine by Unsteady Turbulent Flow Simulation
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
131
(
10
), p.
101102
.10.1115/1.3184025
2.
Bergant
,
A.
,
Simpson
,
A. R.
, and
Tijsseling
,
A. S.
,
2006
, “
Water Hammer With Column Separation: A Historical Review
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
,
22
(
2
), pp.
135
171
.10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2005.08.008
3.
Barna
,
I. F.
, and
Ezsol
,
G.
,
2011
, “
Multiple Condensation Induced Water Hammer Events, Experiments and Theoretical Investigations
,”
Kerntechnik
,
76
(
4
), pp.
231
236
.10.3139/124.110154
4.
Narayanan
,
C.
,
Thomas
,
S.
, and
Lakehal
,
D.
,
2020
, “
CFD Study of Hydraulic Shock in Two-Phase Anhydrous Ammonia
,”
ASHRAE Trans.
,
126
(
2
), pp.
581
593
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342661180_CFD_Study_of_Hydraulic_Shock_in_Two-Phase_Anhydrous_Ammonia
5.
Narayanan
,
C.
,
2021
, “
Numerical Simulation of Flashing Using a Pressure-Based Compressible Multiphase Approach and a Thermodynamic Cavitation Model
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
,
135
, p.
103511
.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103511
6.
Manninen
,
M.
,
Taivassalo
,
V.
,
Energy
,
V.
, and
Kallio
,
S.
,
1996
, “
On the Mixture Model for Multiphase Flow
,” Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland.https://publications.vtt.fi/pdf/publications/1996/P288.pdf
7.
Poinsot
,
T.
, and
Veynante
,
D.
,
2005
, “
Theoretical and Numerical Combustion
,”
RT Edwards, Inc
., Philadelphia, PA.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248068931_Theoretical_and_Numerical_Combustion
8.
Labois
,
M.
, and
Narayanan
,
C.
,
2017
, “
Non-Conservative Pressure-Based Compressible Formulation for Multiphase Flows With Heat and Mass Transfer
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
,
96
, pp.
24
33
.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.07.004
9.
Sauer
,
J.
, and
Schnerr
,
G. H.
,
2001
, “
Development of a New Cavitation Model Based on Bubble Dynamics
,”
ZAMM‐J. Appl. Math. Mech.
,
81
(
S3
), pp.
561
562
.10.1002/zamm.20010811559
10.
TransAT CFD
,
2022
, AFRY Switzerland Ltd., Section Advanced Modeling and Simulation, Zurich, Switzerland, accessed Apr. 22, 2023, https://transat-cfd.com/
11.
Pope
,
S. B.
,
2012
,
Turbulent Flows
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
, UK, pp.
123
164
.
12.
Martin
,
C. S.
,
Brown
,
R.
, and
Brown
,
J.
,
2007
, “
Condensation-Induced Hydraulic Shock
,” Final Report, Report No. ASHRAE 970-RP.
13.
Narayanan
,
C.
,
Wiencke
,
B.
, and
Loyko
,
L.
,
2021
, “
CFD Analysis of Pipework Fracture Due to Hydraulic Shock in an Ammonia Refrigeration System
,”
IIAR Natural Refrigeration Conference & Expo
,
Palm Springs, CA
, June 21–24, Paper No. 1, pp.
1
30
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352690092_CFD_Analysis_of_Pipework_Fracture_due_to_Hydraulic_Shock_in_an_Ammonia_Refrigeration_System
14.
Wiencke
,
B.
,
2008
, “
A Case Study of Pipework Fracture Due to Hydraulic Shock in an Ammonia System
,”
IIAR Ammonia Refrigeration Conference & Exhibition
,
Colorado Springs, CO
, Mar. 16–19, Paper No. 6, pp.
144
202
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348756327_A_Case_Study_of_Pipework_Fracture_due_to_Hydraulic_Shock_in_an_Ammonia_System_SI_-Units
15.
Narayanan
,
C.
,
2022
, “
CFD-Based Design Basis for the Avoidance of Hydraulic Shock in Ammonia Pipework Systems
,”
IIAR 2022 Natural Refrigeration Conference & Expo
,
Savannah, GA
, Mar. 6–9, Paper No. 14.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359229968_CFDbased_design_basis_for_the_avoidance_of_hydraulic_shock_in_ammonia_pipework_systems
16.
Ye
,
D.
,
Li
,
H.
, and
Ryoichi
,
A. S.
,
2016
, “
Fluidization Characteristics of Medium-High-Consistency Pulp Fiber Suspensions With an Impeller
,”
Int. J. Rotating Mach.
, 2016, pp.
1
8
.https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijrm/2016/3902723/
17.
Derakhshandeh
,
B.
,
Kerekes
,
R.
,
Hatzikiriakos
,
S.
, and
Bennington
,
C.
,
2011
, “
Rheology of Pulp Fibre Suspensions: A Critical Review
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
,
66
(
15
), pp.
3460
3470
.10.1016/j.ces.2011.04.017
18.
Derakhshandeh
,
B.
,
2011
, “
Rheology of Low to Medium Consistency Pulp Fibre Suspensions
,”
University of British Columbia
, Vancouver, BC, Canada.https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/stream/pdf/24/1.0059089/2
You do not currently have access to this content.