Abstract

Buried pipelines are faced with and vulnerable to extreme hazards such as earthquakes, different types of faulting, and landslides. Generally, a buried pipeline is modeled as a beam on a series of springs, which represent the surrounding soil. To determine the specifications of these springs, the equations proposed by ASCE Guideline are usually used. Its accuracy was doubted by some recent studies. In this study, two full-scale tests simulating the effect of strike-slip faulting were initially carried out on 4 and 8-in. diameter steel pipes buried in compacted sandy soil. The displacement of the pipe was recorded directly at any moment, along its length. Then through optimization-based simulations, the specifications of the equivalent springs of the soil were calculated so that the deformation of the pipe along its length would be consistent with the experimental results. Then, based upon verified finite element models, a database of different parameters of buried pipes subjected to strike-slip faulting including the diameters and different burial depths was created. The results showed that the ASCE equations need modification at the condition of strike-slip faulting and so, based on the created database, a new form of the equations of lateral interaction between dense sandy soil and steel pipe in the presence of strike-slip fault was proposed.

References

1.
Trautmann
,
C. H.
, and
O'Rourke
,
T. D.
, D.,
1985
, “
Lateral Force‐Displacement Response of Buried Pipe
,”
J. Geotech. Eng.
,
111
(
9
), pp.
1077
1092
.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:9(1077)
2.
Petak
,
W. J.
, and
Elahi
,
S.
,
2001
, “
The Northridge Earthquake, USA and Its Economic and Social Impacts
,” EuroConference Global Change and Catastrophic Risk Management: Earthquake Risks in Europe (
IIASA
), Laxenburg, Austria, July, p.
28
.http://resilience.abag.ca.gov/wp-content/documents/resilience/toolkit/The%20Northridge%20Earthquake%20and%20its%20Economic%20and%20Social%20Impacts.pdf
3.
O'Rourke
,
T. D.
,
Jeon
,
S. S.
,
Toprak
,
S.
,
Cubrinovski
,
M.
,
Hughes
,
M.
,
Van Ballegooy
,
S.
, and
Bouziou
,
D.
,
2014
, “
Earthquake Response of Underground Pipeline Networks in Christchurch, NZ
,”
Earthquake Spectra
,
30
(
1
), pp.
183
204
.10.1193/030413EQS062M
4.
O'Rourke
,
T. D.
, and
Holzer
,
T. L.
,
1992
, “
The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989–Marina District
,” U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, Paper No.
1551-F
.https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/pp1551/pp1551f/
5.
Bruneau
,
M.
,
Buckle
,
I.
,
Chang
,
S.
,
Flores
,
P.
,
O'Rourke
,
T.
,
Shinozuka
,
M.
, and
Soong
,
T.
,
2000
, “The Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake of September 21, 1999: Reconnaissance Report,” Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (
MCEER
), University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, Report No. MCEER-00-0003.https://ubir.buffalo.edu/xmlui/handle/10477/692
6.
Hosseini
,
M.
, and
Tahamouli Roudsari
,
M.
,
2015
, “
Minimum Effective Length and Modified Criteria for Damage Evaluation of Continuous Buried Straight Steel Pipelines Subjected to Seismic Waves
,”
J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract.
,
6
(
4
), p.
04014018
.10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000193
7.
ASCE
,
1984
,
Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems
,
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)-Committee on Gas and Liquid Fuel Lifeline, New York
.
8.
Newmark
,
N. M.
, and
Rosenblueth
,
E.
,
1971
,
Fundamental of Earthquake Engineering
,
Prentice Hall
,
Englewood, CO
.
9.
Newmark
,
N. M.
, and
Hall
,
W. J.
,
1975
, “
Pipeline Design to Resist Large Fault Displacement
,”
U.S National Conference on Earthquake Engineering
, PEER/NIEES EERC Library, Ann Arbor,
MI
, June 18–20, pp. 416–425.
10.
Kennedy
,
R. P.
,
Chow
,
A. M.
, and
Williamson
,
R. A.
,
1977
, “
Fault Movement Effects on Buried Oil Pipeline
,”
ASCE Transp. Eng. J.
,
103
, pp.
617
633
.
11.
Yun
,
H.
, and
Kyriakides
,
S.
,
1985
, “
Model for Beam-Mode Buckling of Buried Pipelines
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
,
111
(
2
), pp.
235
253
.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:2(235)
12.
Wagner
,
D. A.
,
Murff
,
J. D.
,
Brennodden
,
H.
, and
Sveggen
,
O.
,
1989
, “
Pipe‐Soil Interaction Model
,”
J. Waterw., Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng.
,
115
(
2
), pp.
205
220
.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1989)115:2(205)
13.
Zhou
,
Z.
, and
Murray
,
D. W.
,
1996
, “
Pipeline Beam Models Using Stiffness Property Deformation Relations
,”
J. Transp. Eng.
,
122
(
2
), pp.
164
172
.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1996)122:2(164)
14.
Yoshizaki
,
K.
,
O'Rourke
,
T. D.
, and
Hamada
,
M.
,
2003
, “
Large Scale Experiments of Buried Steel Pipelines With Elbows Subjected to Permanent Ground Deformation
,”
Struct. Eng./Earthquake Eng.
,
20
(
1
), pp.
1s
11s
.10.2208/jsceseee.20.1s
15.
Abdoun
,
T. H.
,
Ha
,
D.
,
O'Rourke
,
M. J.
,
Symans
,
M. D.
,
O'Rourke
,
T. D.
,
Palmer
,
M. C.
, and
Stewart
,
H. E.
,
2009
, “
Factors Influencing the Behavior of Buried Pipelines Subjected to Earthquake Faulting
,”
Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng.
,
29
(
3
), pp.
415
427
.10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.04.006
16.
Roudsari
,
M. T.
,
Seif
,
M. A.
, and
Jamshidi
,
K. H.
,
2013
, “
Numerical Study of Pipe-Soil Interaction Subjected to Strike-Slip Faulting
,” International Conference on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology (ICPTT), Xi'an, China, Oct. 16–18, pp.
695
704
.
17.
Zhang
,
J.
,
Liang
,
Z.
, and
Han
,
C. J.
,
2014
, “
Buckling Behavior Analysis of Buried Gas Pipeline Under Strike-Slip Fault Displacement
,”
J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng.
,
21
, pp.
921
928
.10.1016/j.jngse.2014.10.028
18.
Rahman
,
M. A.
, and
Taniyama
,
H.
,
2015
, “
Analysis of a Buried Pipeline Subjected to Fault Displacement: A DEM and FEM Study
,”
Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng.
,
71
, pp.
49
62
.10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.01.011
19.
Dadfar
,
B.
,
Hesham El Naggar
,
M.
, and
Nastev
,
M.
,
2015
, “
Ovalization of Steel Energy Pipelines Buried in Saturated Sands During Ground Deformations
,”
Comput. Geotech.
,
69
, pp.
105
113
.10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.05.004
20.
Yifei
,
Y.
,
Bing
,
S.
,
Jianjun
,
W.
, and
Xiangzhen
,
Y.
,
2018
, “
A Study on Stress of Buried Oil and Gas Pipeline Crossing a Fault Based on Thin Shell FEM Model
,”
Tunnelling Underground Space Technol.
,
81
, pp.
472
479
.10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.031
21.
Zeng
,
X.
,
Dong
,
F.
,
fei
,
Xie
,
X.
,
dong
., and
Du
,
G. F.
,
2019
, “
A New Analytical Method of Strain and Deformation of Pipeline Under Fault Movement
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
172
, pp.
199
211
.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.03.005
22.
ASTM
,
2011
, “Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System),”
ASTM
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, Standard No. ASTM D2487-11.
23.
ASTM
,
2012
, “Standard Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort,”
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No
. ASTM D1557.
24.
ASTM
,
2015
, “Standard Test Method for Density and Unit Weight of Soil in Place by Sand-Cone Method,”
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, Standard No. ASTM D-1556.
25.
ASTM
,
2011
, “Standard Test Method Direct Shear Test Soils under Consolidated Drained,” ASTM,
West Conshohocken, PA
, Standard No. ASTM D 3080.
26.
ASTM
,
2016
, “Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products,” ASTM,
West Conshohocken, PA
, Standard No. ASTM A370.
27.
API
,
2004
, “API 5 L Specification for Line Pipe,”
American Petroleum Institute
Washington, DC, Standard No. API SPEC 5L 43rd ED (E1)
.
28.
Das
,
B. M.
,
2006
,
Principles of Geotechnical Engineering
,
Thomson Canada Limited
,
London, ON, Canada
.
You do not currently have access to this content.