The need of enhanced seismic analysis and design rules for petrochemical piping systems is widely recognized, where the allowable stress design method is still the customary practice. This paper presents an up-to-date performance-based seismic analysis (PBSA) of piping systems. The concept of performance-based analysis is introduced and a link between limit states and earthquake levels is proposed, exemplifying international code prescriptions. A brief review on seismic design criteria of piping systems is then provided by identifying the main critical issues. Finally, the actual application of the performance-based approach is illustrated through nonlinear seismic analyses of two realistic petrochemical piping systems.

References

References
1.
Sezen
,
H.
, and
Whittaker
,
A. S.
,
2006
, “
Seismic Performance of Industrial Facilities Affected by the 1999 Turkey Earthquake
,”
J. Perform. Constr. Facil.
,
20
(
1
), pp.
28
36
.
2.
Krausmann
,
E.
,
Cruz
,
A. M.
, and
Affeltranger
,
B.
,
2010
, “
The Impact of the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake on Industrial Facilities
,”
J. Loss Prev. Process Ind.
,
23
(
2
), pp.
242
248
.
3.
Zare
,
M. R.
, and
Wilkson
,
S.
,
2010
, “
Resilience of Wastewater Pipelines in Earthquakes
,”
9th U.S. National and 10th Canadian Conference
, Toronto, ON, Canada, July 25–29, pp. 6577–6586.
4.
Paolacci
,
F.
,
Giannini
,
R.
, and
Angelis
,
M. D.
,
2013
, “
Seismic Response Mitigation of Chemical Plant Components by Passive Control Systems
,”
J. Loss Prev. Process Ind.
,
26
(
5
), pp.
924
935
.
5.
Vathi
,
M.
,
Karamanos
,
S.
,
Kapogiannis
,
I. A.
, and
Spillopoulos
,
K. V.
,
2015
, “
Performance Criteria for Liquid Storage Tanks and Piping Systems Subjected to Seismic Loading
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2015-45700.
6.
EN 1998-4
,
2006
,
Eurocode 8-Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance–Part 4: Silos, Tanks and Pipelines
, CEN, Brussels.
7.
Paolacci
,
F.
,
Reza
,
M. S.
, and
Bursi
,
O. S.
,
2011
, “
Seismic Analysis and Component Design of Refinery Piping Systems
,”
3rd International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
,
COMPDYN
2011, Corfu, Greece, May 25–28.
8.
Reza
,
M. S.
,
Bursi
,
O. S.
,
Paolacci
,
F.
, and
Kumar
,
A.
,
2014
, “
Enhanced Seismic Performance of Non-Standard Bolted Flange Joints for Petrochemical Piping Systems
,”
J. Loss Prev. Process Ind.
,
30
, pp.
124
136
.
9.
Paolacci
,
F.
,
Reza
,
M. S.
,
Bursi
,
O. S.
,
Gresnit
,
N.
, and
Kumar
,
A.
,
2013
, “
Main Issues on the Seismic Design of Industrial Piping Systems and Components
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2013-97642.
10.
EN 13480-3
,
2002
,
Metallic Industrial Piping–Part 3: Design and Calculation
, CEN, Brussels.
11.
ASME B31.1
,
2001
,
Power Piping, ASME Code for Pressure Piping, B31
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, New York.
12.
ASME B31.3
,
2006
,
Process Piping, ASME Code for Pressure Piping, B31
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, New York.
13.
ASCE/SEI 7-05
,
2005
,
Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
,
American Society of Civil Engineers
, Reston, VA.
14.
EN 1998-1
,
2005
,
Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance–Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings
, CEN, Brussels.
15.
NEA/CSNI/R(2007)17
,
2008
, “
Differences in Approach Between Nuclear and Conventional Seismic Standards With Regard to Hazard Definition
,” CSNI Integrity and Ageing Working Group, Nuclear Energy Agency Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
16.
NFPA 59A
,
2013
, “
Standards for the Production, Storage and Handling of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
,” National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA.
17.
Structural Engineers Association of California
,
1995
,
Vision 2000-A Framework for Performance-Based Design
,
California Office of Emergency Services
, Sacramento, CA.
18.
Norme Tecniche
,
2008
, “
Norme Techniche per le costruzioni
,” DM Infrastrutture, 14 January 2008 (in Italian).
19.
2011
, “
Arrête du 24 janvier 2011 fixant les regles parasismiques applicables a certaines installations classes
,” DEVP1102251A, Ministère de l’écologie du développement durable des transports et du logement, J. Off. République Française, Texte 14 sur 239.
20.
D'Amico
,
V.
,
Meletti
,
C.
, and
Martinelli
,
F.
,
2012
, “
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment in the High-Risk Area of South-Eastern Sicily (Italy)
,”
Boll. Geofis. Teor. Appl.
,
53
(
1
), pp.
19
36
.
21.
Azizpour
,
O.
, and
Hosseisni
,
M.
,
2009
, “
A Verification of ASCE Recommended Guidelines for Seismic Evaluation and Design of Combination Structures in Petrochemical Facilities
,”
J. Appl. Sci.
,
9
(
20
), pp.
3609
3628
.
22.
DeGrassi
,
G.
,
Nie
,
J.
, and
Hofmayer
,
C.
,
2008
, “
Seismic Analysis of Large-Scale Piping Systems for the JNES-NUPEC Ultimate Strength Piping Test Program
,” U.S. NRC NUREG/CR-6983, BNL-NUREG-81548-2008.
23.
Karamanos
,
S. A.
,
Tsouvalas
,
D.
, and
Gresnigt
,
A. M.
,
2006
, “
Ultimate Bending Capacity and Buckling of Pressurized 90 Deg Steel Elbows
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
128
(
3
), pp.
348
356
.
24.
Bursi
,
O. S.
,
Abbiati
,
G.
,
Caracoglia
,
L.
, and
Reza
,
M. S.
,
2014
, “
Effects of Uncertainties in Boundary Conditions on Dynamic Characteristics of Industrial Plant Components
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2014-28177.
25.
Okeil
,
A.
, and
Tung
,
C.
,
1996
, “
Effects of Ductility on Seismic Response of Piping Systems and Their Implication on Design and Qualification
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
166
(
1
), pp.
69
83
.
26.
Touboul
,
F.
,
Blay
,
N.
,
Sollogoub
,
P.
, and
Chapuliot
,
S.
,
2006
, “
Enhanced Seismic Criteria for Piping
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
236
(
1
), pp.
1
9
.
27.
Liu
,
B.
,
Liu
,
X. J.
, and
Zhang
,
H.
,
2009
, “
Strain-Based Design Criteria of Pipelines
,”
J. Loss Prev. Process Ind.
,
22
(
6
), pp.
884
888
.
28.
DNV-OS-F101
,
2000
, “
Submarine Pipeline Systems[S]
,” Høvik, Norway.
29.
CSA-Z662
,
2007
, “
Canadian Standards Association. Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems
,” Exdale, ON, Canada.
30.
Bursi
,
O. S.
,
Reza
,
M. S.
,
Abbiati
,
G.
, and
Paolacci
,
F.
,
2015
, “
Performance-Based Earthquake Evaluation of a Full-Scale Petrochemical Piping System
,”
J. Loss Prev. Process Ind.
,
33
, pp.
10
22
.
31.
SAP2000
,
2004
,
Linear and Nonlinear Static and Dynamic Analysis and Design of Three-Dimensional Structures, v9
,
Computers and Structures, Inc.
,
Berkeley, CA
.
32.
Hibbit
,
H. D.
,
Karlsson
,
B. I.
, and
Sorensen
,
2003
,
Theory Manual, ABAQUS Version 6.3
, Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen,
Providence, RI
.
33.
Varelis
,
G. E.
,
Pappa
,
P.
, and
Karamanos
,
S. A.
,
2011
, “
Finite Element Analysis of Industrial Steel Elbows Under Strong Cyclic Loading
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2011-57260.
34.
ASCE
,
2005
,
Guidelines for the Design of Buried Steel Pipe (With Addenda Through February 2005)
,
American Society of Civil Engineers
, Reston, VA.
35.
FEMA-273
,
1997
,
NEHRP Guidelines for Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings
,
Building Seismic Safety Council, FEMA
,
Washington, DC
.
36.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Code Case N-411-1
,
1986
,
Alternative Damping Values for Response Spectra Analysis of Class 1, 2 and 3 Piping. Section III, Division 1
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
New York
.
37.
MIDAS [2010]
,
2010
, “
Gen 2010 (v1.1)
,” Midas Information Technology Co. Ltd.
38.
Iervolino
,
I.
,
Galasso
,
C.
, and
Cosenza
,
E.
,
2009
, “
REXEL: Computer Aided Record Selection for Code-Based Seismic Structural Analysis
,”
Bull. Earthquake Eng.
,
8
(
2
), pp.
339
362
.
39.
Vamvatsikos
,
D.
, and
Cornell
,
C. A.
,
2002
, “
Incremental Dynamic Analysis
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
,
31
(
3
), pp.
491
514
.
40.
Bursi
,
O. S.
,
Reza
,
M. S.
,
Paolacci
,
F.
, and
Kumar
,
A.
,
2012
, “
Seismic Performance of Bolted Flange Joints in Piping Systems for Oil and Gas Industries
,”
15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
, Lisbon, Portugal, Sept. 24–28.
You do not currently have access to this content.