The linear matching method (LMM), a direct numerical method for determining shakedown and ratchet limits of components, has seen significant development in recent years. Previous verifications of these developments against cyclic nonlinear finite element analysis (FEA) have shown favorable results, and now this verification process is being extended to include comparisons with experimental results. This paper presents a comparison of LMM analysis with experimental tests for limit loads and shakedown limits available in the literature. The limit load and shakedown limits were determined for pipe intersections and nozzle-sphere intersections, respectively, thus testing the accuracy of the LMM when analyzing real plant components. Details of the component geometries, materials and test procedures used in the experiments are given. Following this a description of the LMM analysis is given which includes a description of how these features have been interpreted for numerical analysis. A comparison of the results shows that the LMM is capable of predicting accurate yet conservative limit loads and shakedown limits.

References

References
1.
British Energy Generation Limited
,
2003
,
R5: An Assessment Procedure for the High Temperature Response of Structures
,
Revision 3, British Energy Generation Limited
,
Gloucester, UK
.
2.
Koiter
,
W. T.
,
1960
, “
General Theorems for Elastic Plastic Solids
,”
Progress in Solid Mechanics
,
J. N.
Sneddon
and
R.
Hill
, eds.,
North Holland, Amsterdam
, pp.
167
221
.
3.
Melan
,
E.
,
1936
, “
Theorie Statisch Unbestimmter Systeme aus Ideal-plastichem Baustoff
,”
Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien
,
2A
(
145
), pp.
195
218
.
4.
Chen
,
H.
,
2010
, “
Lower and Upper Bound Shakedown Analysis of Structures With Temperature Dependent Material Properties
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
132
(
1
), p.
011202
.10.1115/1.4000369
5.
Chen
,
H.
, and
Ponter
,
A. R. S.
,
2010
, “
A Direct Method on the Evaluation of Ratchet Limit
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
132
(
4
), p.
041202
.10.1115/1.4001524
6.
Chen
,
H.
,
Ure
,
J.
, and
Tipping
,
D.
,
2013
, “
Calculation of a Lower Bound Ratchet Limit Part 1 - Theory, Numerical Implementation and Verification
,”
Eur. J. Mech. A. Solids
,
37
, pp.
361
368
.10.1016/j.euromechsol.2012.04.001
7.
Ure
,
J.
,
Chen
,
H.
, and
Tipping
,
D.
,
2013
, “
Calculation of a Lower Bound Ratchet Limit Part 2 - Application to a Pipe Intersection With Dissimilar Material Join
,”
Eur. J. Mech. A. Solids
,
37
, pp.
369
378
.10.1016/j.euromechsol.2012.04.002
8.
Ellyin
,
F.
,
1976
, “
Experimental Investigation of Limit Loads of Nozzles in Cylindrical Vessels
,”
Weld. Res. Counc. Bull.
,
219
, pp.
1
14
. Available at: https://forengineers.org/bulletin/wrc-219
9.
Proctor
,
E.
, and
Flinders
,
F.
,
1968
, “
Shakedown Investigations on Partial Penetration Welded Nozzles in a Spherical Shell
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
8
(
1
), pp.
171
185
.10.1016/0029-5493(68)90025-3
10.
Abaqus,
2009
, “
Users Manual
,” Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp.
You do not currently have access to this content.