Examination of proof test data for new (not previously installed) stainless steel (SS) trim spring operated pressure relief valves (SOPRV) reveals that adhesions form between the seat and disk in about 46% of all such SOPRV. The forces needed to overcome these adhesions can be sufficiently large to cause the SOPRV to fail its proof test (FPT) prior to installation. Furthermore, a significant percentage of SOPRV which are found to FPT are also found to “fail to open” (FTO) meaning they would not relief excess pressure in the event of an overpressure event. The cases where adhesions result in FTO or FPT appear to be confined to SOPRV with diameters less than or equal to 1 in. and set pressures less than 150 pounds per square inch gauge (psig) and the FTO are estimated to occur in 0.31% to 2.00% of this subpopulation of SS trim SOPRV. The reliability and safety implications of these finding for end users who do not perform pre-installation testing of SOPRV are discussed.

Issue Section:
Operations, Applications and Components
Topics:
Adhesion, Pressure, Valves, Safety, Springs, Testing, Relief valves, Stainless steel

References

1.
IEC 61508,
2010
, Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems, Geneva, Switzerland.
2.
ANSI/ISA SP84.00.02-2004,
2004
, (IEC 61511 Mod.), Application of Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industries, ISA, Raleigh, NC.
3.
Bukowski
,
J. V.
, and
Gross
,
R. E.
,
2010
, “
Results of Root Cause Analyses of Spring Operated Pressure Relief Valve Failures
,”
Proceedings of the AIChE 6th Global Congress on Process Safety, 12th Process Plant Safety Symposium
, San Antonio, TX.
4.
Bukowski
,
J. V.
,
Gross
,
R. E.
, and
Goble
,
W. M.
,
2011
, “
Probability of Initial Failure for Spring Operated Relief Valves
,”
Proceedings of the ASME 2011 Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference
,
ASME
Paper No. PVP2011-58052, Baltimore, MD DOI: 10.1115/PVP2011-58052.
5.
Bukowski
,
J. V.
,
Gross
,
R. E.
, and
Goble
,
W. M.
,
2012
, “
The Adhesion Failure Mode in Stainless Steel Trim Spring Operated Pressure Relief Valves
,”
Proceedings of the ASME 2012 Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference
, Paper No. ASME PVP2012-78248, Toronto, Canada.
6.
McFarlane
,
J. S.
, and
Tabor
,
D.
,
1950
, “
Adhesion of Solids and the Effect of Surface Films
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
202
, pp.
224
–
243
.10.1098/rspa.1950.0096
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
7.
Cold Welding
,
1982
, “
Advanced Automation for Space Missions
,”
Proceedings of the 1980 NASA/ASEE Summer Study
,
R. A.
Freitas, Jr.
, and
W. P.
Gilbreat
, eds., Publication No. NASA CP-2255.
8.
Braun
,
O. M.
, and
Naumovets
,
A. G.
,
2006
, “
Nanotribology: Microscopic Mechanisms of Friction
,”
Surf. Sci. Rep.
60
, pp.
79
–
158
.10.1016/j.surfrep.2005.10.004
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
9.
Bhushan
,
B.
,
2001
,
Modern Tribology Handbook
, Vol.
1
,
CRC Press, Ohio State University
,
Columbus, OH
.
10.
Hearn
,
E. J.
,
1997
,
Mechanics of Materials 2, An Introduction to the Mechanics of Elastic and Plastic Deformation of Solids and Structural Materials
, 3rd ed.,
Butterworth-Heinemann
, Oxford, UK.
11.
Smith
,
D. J.
,
2003
, “
The Influence of Prior Loading on Structural Integrity
,”
Comprehensive Structural Integrity
, Vol.
7
,
I.
Milner
,
R. O.
Richie
, and
B.
Karihaloo
, eds.,
Elsevier
,
Oxford, UK
.
12.
Smith
,
D. J.
,
2006
, “
The Influence of Prior Loading on Structural Integrity
,”
Comprehensive Structural Integrity, Volume 1, Structural Integrity Assessment—Examples and Case Studies
,
I.
Milner
,
R. O.
Richie
, and
B.
Karihaloo
, eds.,
Elsevier
,
Oxford, UK
.
13.
Gross
,
R.
,
2004
, “
Reliability Testing of Pressure Relief Valves
,” Design and Analysis of Pressure Vessels, Heat Exchangers, and Piping Components—2004, PVP-Vol 477, Paper # PVP2004-2610, San Diego, CA.
14.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII Division 1, UG-126 Pressure Relief Valves to UG-129 Marking, ASME International, New York, NY, 2010.
15.
ASME PCC-3-2007,
2007
, Inspection Planning Using Risk-Based Methods, ASME, New York.
16.
API RP 581,
2008
,
Risk-Based Inspection Technology, Section 7 Pressured Relief Devices
, 2nd ed.,
American Petroleum Institute
(API) Recommended Practice 581, Washington, DC.
17.
API RP 576,
2009
,
Inspection of Pressure Relieving Devices
, 3rd ed.,
American Petroleum Institute (API)
Recommended Practice 576, Washington, DC.
18.
Johnson
,
R. A.
,
2000
,
Miller & Freund's Probability and Statistics for Engineers
, 6th ed.,
Prentice Hall, Inc.
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
.
19.
2013
, “
Binomial Proportion Confidence Interval
,” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_proportion_confidence_interval (last accessed March 10, 2013).
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.