During the safety assessments of transport packages, cumulative damages are naturally accumulated for assessments performed using physical tests specimens. However, such cumulative damages are not as easily accounted for when assessments are made through numerical simulations. While analysts are comfortable with simulating packages for single events, it is not yet common practice to incorporate the effect handed over from a former event to the next, in a series of sequential load events. Thus, many numerical simulations in a safety analysis report (SAR) represent just a single event in a series of sequential events comprising the required accident conditions. These single event numerical simulations are then based on the initial conditions that differ from the analogous physical test specimen, which could contribute to a growing disparity in the results between assessments through physical testing compared to a numerical simulation. The reason why analyses do not consider the cumulative damage is difficulties in delivering the final results of the previous analysis to the current analysis. The hypothetical accident conditions described in the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) regulations include drop, puncture, fire, and water immersion conditions, which should be sequentially simulated. There can be cumulative damage between two accident conditions, such as drop and puncture, puncture and fire, and so forth. In this study, as the first step to consider cumulative damage, an analysis technology to perform a puncture analysis incorporating the final response field from a prior drop analysis is proposed. The necessity and validity of the proposed analysis technology are evaluated through a comparison with the results obtained by performing each analysis independently.

References

References
1.
IAEA
,
2009
, IAEA Safety Standard Series No. TS-R-1, “
Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material
.”
2.
IAEA
,
2008
, IAEA Safety Standard Series No. TS-G-1.1(ST2), “
Advisory Material for the IAEA Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material
.”
3.
Nuclear Safety and Security Commission
,
2012
, Korea NSSC Act. 2012-49, “
Regulations for Packaging and Transport of Radioactive Material
.”
4.
U.S.NRC
,
1997
, “
U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Material
,” Title 10, Part 71.
5.
Choi
,
W.-S.
,
Kim
,
T.-W.
, and
Seo
,
K.-S.
,
2008
, “
Shape Optimization of a Perforated Pressure Vessel Cover Under Linearized Stress Constraints
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
238
, pp.
2468
2472
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.02.004
6.
Sohn
,
H. D.
, and
Kim
,
J. K.
,
2011
, “
Effect of Stainless Steel Plate Position on Neutron Multiplication Factor in Spent Fuel Storage Racks
,”
Nucl. Eng. Technol.
,
43
(
1
), pp.
75
82
.10.5516/NET.2011.43.1.075
7.
Choi
,
W.-S.
, and
Seo
,
K.-S.
,
2010
, “
A Simple Sizing Optimization Technique for an Impact Limiter Based on Dynamic Material Properties
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
240
, pp.
925
932
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.12.008
8.
Choi
,
W.-S.
,
Jeon
,
J.-E.
,
Seo
,
K.-S.
,
Park
,
J.-E.
,
You
,
G.-S.
,
Park
,
W.-G.
,
Wu
,
T.
,
Gorczyca
,
J. L.
,
Leduc
,
D. R.
, and
England
,
J. L.
,
2011
, “
Demonstration Drop Test and Design Enhancement of the CANDU Spent Fuel Storage Basket in Dry Storage Facility
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
241
, pp.
723
730
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.12.024
9.
Turinsky
,
P. J.
,
2012
, “
Advances in Multi-Physics and High Performance Computing in Support of Nuclear Reactor Power Systems Modeling and Simulation
,”
Nucl. Eng. Technol.
,
44
(
2
), pp.
103
112
.10.5516/NET.01.2012.500
10.
Wu
,
T.
,
Gorczyca
,
J. L.
,
Leduc
,
D. R.
, and
England
,
J. L.
,
2008
, “
Dynamic Analysis of Hanford Unirradiated Fuel Package Subjected to Sequential Lateral Loads in Hypothetical Accident Conditions
,” PVP 2008-61564.
11.
Wu
,
T.
,
2009
, “
Structural Analysis of Fuel Casks Subjected to Bolt Preload, Internal Pressure and Sequential Dynamic Impacts
,” INMM.
12.
Jordan
,
J. M.
,
2010
, “
Finite Element Analysis of Bulk Tritium Shipping Package
,” INMM.
13.
ASME
,
2007
, ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Section III Division 3, “
Containments for Transportation and Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High Level radioactive Materials and Waste
,” New York.
You do not currently have access to this content.