There exist some atypical loads on pressure vessels during transportation. This is particularly true when the pressure vessel weighs over 500 tonnes. In this example vessel, the transportation was via rail on a “Schnabel car,” in which the vessel is suspended horizontally between the top nozzle and the skirt, and a significant axial compressive load is applied. During the evaluation of the stresses in the top head, a particularly novel situation was encountered which brought about some interesting issues with regards to the three design-by-analysis methods: elastic, limit load, and elastic-plastic. This paper discusses the comparison between all three of these design-by-analysis methods, and provides recommendations for which is most appropriate for this type of evaluation. Additional recommendations and warnings are provided for the use of the elastic and limit load methods as well.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: mstonehouse@becht.com
e-mail: tseipp@becht.com
Article navigation
October 2012
Technical Briefs
A Novel Comparison of Design-by-Analysis Methods
Mark Stonehouse,
Mark Stonehouse
Becht Engineering Canada, Ltd., 110–259 Midpark Way, S.E.,
e-mail: mstonehouse@becht.com
Calgary, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Trevor G. Seipp,
Trevor G. Seipp
Becht Engineering Canada, Ltd., 110–259 Midpark Way, S.E.,
e-mail: tseipp@becht.com
Calgary, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Shawn Morrison
Shawn Morrison
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark Stonehouse
Becht Engineering Canada, Ltd., 110–259 Midpark Way, S.E.,
Calgary, AB, Canada
e-mail: mstonehouse@becht.com
Trevor G. Seipp
Becht Engineering Canada, Ltd., 110–259 Midpark Way, S.E.,
Calgary, AB, Canada
e-mail: tseipp@becht.com
Shinichiro Kanamaru
Shawn Morrison
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. Oct 2012, 134(5): 054502 (4 pages)
Published Online: September 10, 2012
Article history
Received:
February 28, 2011
Revised:
February 8, 2012
Online:
September 10, 2012
Published:
September 10, 2012
Citation
Stonehouse, M., Seipp, T. G., Kanamaru, S., and Morrison, S. (September 10, 2012). "A Novel Comparison of Design-by-Analysis Methods." ASME. J. Pressure Vessel Technol. October 2012; 134(5): 054502. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4006343
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
Effect of Nozzle Junction and Equipment Stiffness on Absorption of Pipe Thermal Loads
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (April,2016)
Ratcheting Assessment of a Fixed Tube Sheet Heat Exchanger Subject to In Phase Pressure and Temperature Cycles
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2011)
Stress Analysis and Design for Cyclic Loading
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (November,2000)
Weight-Saving Plastic Design of Pressure Vessels
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (May,1997)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Openings
Guidebook for the Design of ASME Section VIII Pressure Vessels, Third Edition
Openings
Guidebook for the Design of ASME Section VIII Pressure Vessels
Subsection NE—Class MC Components
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes, Volume 1 Sixth Edition