The high pressure branch pipe in hydropower station (BPHS) is usually composed by different materials in different parts and has complicated geometric configurations. The accurate and efficient methods for safety evaluation of the BPHS are still desirable. By introducing the element bearing ratio (EBR), generalized yield criterion as well as the reference volume concept, the elastic modulus reduction method (EMRM) is improved and applied to determine both the upper and lower bounds on limit loads of the BPHS. The global safety factor (GSF) is defined as the ratio of limit load to design load. The safety performance of the BPHS is assessed by comparing the GSF resulted from the EMRM with its allowable value specified in code. The efficiency and precision of the proposed method for safety evaluation of the BPHS are demonstrated through numerical examples in this paper. The results show that the proposed method is more suitable for safety evaluation and design optimization of the BPHS, compared with the elastic stress analysis method (ESAM) based on stress categorization which might underestimate the safety performance of the BPHS.

References

1.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 2007, Section VIII, ASME, New York.
2.
Yu
,
M. H.
,
Ma
,
G. W.
, and
Li
,
J. C.
, 2009,
Structural Plasticity: Limit Shakedown and Dynamic Plastic Analyses of Structures
,
Springer
,
Berlin
.
3.
Maier
,
G.
, and
Munro
,
J.
, 1982, “
Mathematical Programming Applications to Engineering Plastic Analysis
,”
Appl. Mech. Rev.
,
35
(
12
), pp.
1631
1643
.
4.
Weichert
,
D.
, and
Ponter
,
A. R. S.
, 2009,
Limit States of Materials and Structures: Direct Methods
,
Springer Science
,
New York
.
5.
Mackenzie
,
D.
,
Boyle
,
J. T.
, and
Hamilton
,
R.
, 2000, “
The Elastic Compensation Method for Limit and Shakedown Analysis: A Review
,”
J. Strain Anal.
,
35
(
3
), pp.
171
188
.
6.
Adibi-Asl
,
R.
,
Ihab
,
F. Z.
, and
Seshadri
,
R.
, 2006, “
Elastic Modulus Adjustment Procedures—Improved Convergence Schemes
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
,
83
(
2
), pp.
154
160
.
7.
Jones
,
G. L.
, and
Dhalla
,
A. K.
, 1986, “
ASME Code Classification of Pipe Stresses: A Simplified Elastic Procedure
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
26
(
2
), pp.
145
166
.
8.
Marriott
,
D. L.
, 1998, “
Evaluation of Deformation or Load Control of Stress Under Inelastic Conditions Using Elastic Finite Element Stress Analysis
,”
ASME Pressure Vessel Technology Conference
,
Pittsburgh
,
Pennsylvania
, Vol.
136
, pp.
3
9
.
9.
Seshadri
,
R.
, and
Fernando
,
C. P. D.
, 1992, “
Limit Loads of Mechanical Components and Structures Using the GLOSS R-Node Method
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
114
(
2
), pp.
201
208
.
10.
Mackenzie
,
D.
, and
Boyle
,
J. T.
, 1996, “
A Method of Estimating Limit Loads Using Elastic Analysis, I: Simple Examples
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
53
(
1
), pp.
77
95
.
11.
Shi
,
J.
,
Boyle
,
J. T.
,
Mackenzie
,
D.
, and
Hamilton
,
R.
, 2004, “
Approximate Limit Design of Frames Using Elastic Analysis
,”
Comput. Struct.
,
61
(
3
), pp.
495
501
.
12.
Hamilton
,
R.
, and
Boyle
,
J. T.
, 2002, “
Simplified Lower Bound Limit Analysis of Transversely Loaded Thin Plates Using Generalized Yield Criteria
,”
Thin-Walled Struct.
,
40
(
6
), pp.
503
522
.
13.
Ponter
,
A. R. S.
, and
Carter
,
K. F.
, 1997, “
Limit State Solutions, Based Upon Linear Elastic Solutions With a Spatially Varying Elastic Modulus
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
140
(
3–4
), pp.
237
258
.
14.
Ponter
,
A. R. S.
,
Fuschi
,
P.
, and
Engelhardt
,
M.
, 2000, “
Limit Analysis for a General Class of Yield Conditions
,”
Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids
,
19
(
3
), pp.
401
421
.
15.
Chen
,
L. J.
,
Liu
,
Y. H.
,
Yang
,
P.
, and
Cen
,
Z. Z.
, 2008, “
Limit Analysis of Structures Containing Flaws Based on a Modified Elastic Compensation Method
,”
Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids
,
27
(
2
), pp.
195
209
.
16.
Yang
,
L. F.
,
Yu
,
B.
, and
Qiao
,
Y. P.
, 2009, “
Limit Bearing Capacity Analysis of Frame Using Elastic Modulus Reduction Method
,”
Acta Mech. Solida Sinica
,
22
(
2
), pp.
109
115
.
17.
Yu
,
B.
, and
Yang
,
L. F.
, 2010, “
Elastic Modulus Reduction Method for Limit Analysis Considering Initial Constant and Proportional Loadings
,”
Finite Elem. Anal. Design
,
46
(
12
), pp.
1086
1092
.
18.
Yu
,
B.
, and
Yang
,
L. F.
, 2010, “
Elastic Modulus Reduction Method for Limit Analysis of Thin Plate and Shell Structures
,”
Thin-Walled Struct.
,
48
(
4–5
), pp.
291
298
.
19.
Robinson
,
M.
, 1971, “
A Comparison of Yield Surface for Thin Shells
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
,
13
(
4
), pp.
345
354
.
20.
SL281-2003
, 2003,
Design Specification for Steel Penstocks of Hydroelectric Stations
,
China Waterpower Press
,
Beijing, China
(in Chinese).
You do not currently have access to this content.