The effects of changes in geometries and material properties of rotating band and long range artillery projectile shell body on gun tube stress are presented. The results are based on numerical calculations (finite element analysis, FEA). Numerical explicit dynamic analyses were performed assuming elastic–plastic material behavior and nonlinear kinematics. Mechanical loading of shell body was controlled by pressure–time relationship based on the simulation of internal ballistic cycle. One degree slice of projectile and forcing cone section of gun tube was modeled as simplified smooth bore 3D analysis model. The results were in agreement with the measured results in firing trials and also with the results presented in open literature. Although simplified computations were used, the influences of the structural modifications of the rotating band and the shell body were shown.

References

References
1.
Chen
,
P. C. T.
, 2000, “
Analysis of Engraving and Wear in a Projectile Rotating Band
,”
Proceedings of the Ninth U.S. Army Symposium on Gun Dynamics
,
L. C.
Kathe
, ed.,
Benet Laboratories
,
Watervliet, NY
, pp.
2
-1–2-
12
, Report No. ARCCB-SP-99015.
2.
Chen
,
P. C. T.
, and
Leach
,
M.
, 2001. “
Modeling of Barrel/Projectile Interaction in a Rotating Ban
,” Benet Laboratories, Watervliet, NY, Technical Report No. ARCCB-TR-01011.
3.
Sawyer
,
S. G.
, and
Hurban
,
J. M.
, 1972, “
Analysis of Band Pressure in Gun Tube Using Finite Elements and Shell Pushing Data
,” Ballistic Research Labs, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, Report No. AD 750 373.
4.
Andrews
,
T. D.
, 2005, “
Projectile Driving Band Interactions with Gun Barrels
,”
Gun Tubes 2005 Conference, GT2005, Conference Proceedings
, Apr. 10–13, 2005.
Keble College Oxford, RMCS
,
Shrivenham
, Paper No. S7/P28 (also in J. Press. Vessel Technol.,
128
(
2
), May 2006, pp.
273
278
).
5.
Toivola
,
J.
,
Moilanen
,
S.
,
Tervokoski
,
J.
, and
Keinänen
,
H.
, 2011, “
Influence of Rotating Band Construction on Gun Tube Loading: Measurement and Analysis
,”
GT2011: Gun Tubes Conference
2011.
11
12
April 2011,
Hosted by Cranfield University at the Defence Academy of the UK
,
Shrivenham
, Paper No. S4/P17b.
6.
ABAQUS/Explicit User’s manual, Version 6.7-1, 2007, ABAQUS, Inc., Pawtucket, Rhode Island.
7.
Montgomery
,
R. S.
, 1975, “
Surface Melting of Rotating Bands
,” Benet Weapons Laboratory, Watervliet, NY, Technical Report No. WVT-TR-75060.
8.
Montgomery
,
R. S.
, 1983, “
Evidence for the Melt-lubrication of Projectile Bands
,” Benet Weapons Laboratories, Watervliet, NY, Report No. ARLCB-TR-83031.
9.
FNGUN User Manual, Frasher-Nash Consultancy Ltd, Dorking, United Kingdom.
10.
Flynn
,
P. D.
, 1975, “
Strain-Gage Instrumentation for Ammunition Testing
,”
Exp. Mech.
,
15
, pp.
192
200
.
11.
Viljoen
,
G. G.
, 1995, “
Driving Band Design Considerations
,”
15th International Symposium on Ballistics
,
M.
Mayseless
and
S. R.
Bodner
, eds.,
Proceedings, IB20–Vol. 3
,
Jerusalem, Israel
, May 21–24, 1995,
International Ballistics Committee
, pp.
153
158
.
You do not currently have access to this content.