One of the critical issues for reactor pressure vessel (RPV) structural integrity is related to the pressurized thermal shock (PTS) event. Therefore, within the framework of safety assessments special emphasis is given to the effect of PTS-loadings caused by the nonuniform azimuthal temperature distribution due to cold water plumes or stripes during emergency coolant injection. This paper describes the method used to predict the thermal mechanic boundary conditions (system pressure and wall temperature). Using a system code the pressure and global temperature distributions were calculated, systematically varying the leak size and the location of the coolant water injection. Spatial and temporal temperature distributions in the main circulation pipes and at the RPV wall were predicted by mixing analyses with a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code. The model used for these calculations was validated by post-test calculations of a UPTF (upper plenum test facility) experiment simulating cold leg injection during a small break loss of coolant accident (LOCA). Comparison with measured temperatures showed that the modeling used is suitable to obtain enveloping results. Fracture mechanics analyses were carried out for circumferential flaw sizes in the weld joint near the core region and between the RPV shell and the flange, as well as for axial flaws in the nozzle corner. Stress intensity factors KI were calculated numerically using the finite element program ansys and analytically on the basis of weight and polynomial influence functions using stresses obtained from elastic finite element analyses. Benchmark tests revealed good agreement between the results from numerical and analytical calculations. For all regions of the RPV investigated and the most severe transients it was demonstrated that a large safety margin against brittle crack initiation exists and brittle fracture of the RPV can be excluded.

References

References
1.
Lucas
,
D.
,
Bestion
,
D.
,
Coste
,
P.
,
Pouvreau
,
J.
,
Morel
,
Ch.
,
Martin
,
A.
,
Boucker
,
M.
,
Bodéle
,
E.
,
Schmidtke
,
M.
,
Scheuerer
,
M.
,
Smith
,
B.
,
Dhotre
,
M. T.
,
Ničeno
,
B.
,
Galassi
,
M. C.
,
Mazzini
,
D.
,
D’Auria
,
F.
,
Bartosiewicz
,
Y.
,
Seynhaeve
,
J.-M.
,
Tiselj
,
I.
,
Štrubelj
,
L.
,
Ilvonen
,
M.
,
Kyrki-Rajamäki
,
R.
,
Tanskanen
,
V.
,
Puustinen
,
M.
, and
Laine
,
J.
, 2009, “
Main Results of the European project NURESIM on the CFD-Modelling of Two-Phase Pressurized Thermal Shock (PTS)
,”
Kerntechnik
,
74
, pp.
238
242
.
2.
Scheuerer
,
M.
, 2004, “
Validierung von Computational Fluid Dynamics Methoden für Reaktorsicherheitsanalysen (ECORA)
,” Abschlussbericht GRS-A-3234.
3.
Kerkhof
,
K.
,
Roos
,
E.
,
Bezdikian
,
G.
,
Moinereau
,
D.
, and
Dahl
,
A.
, 2005, “
EU-Project SMILE/Validation of the WPS Effect With a Component Like Cylindrical Specimen
,” Ageing Issues in Nuclear Power Plants, NuPEER.
4.
Lidbury
,
D. P. G.
,
Sherry
,
A. H.
,
Bass
,
B. R.
,
Gilles
,
P.
,
Connors
,
D.
,
Eisele
,
U.
,
Keim
,
E.
,
Keinänen
,
H.
,
Wallin
,
K.
,
Lauerova
,
D.
,
Marie
,
S.
,
Nagel
,
G.
,
Nilsson
,
K.
,
Siegele
,
D.
, and
Wadier
,
Y.
, 2006, “
Validation of Constraint Based Methodology in Structural Integrity of Ferritic Steels for Nuclear Reactor Pressure Vessels
,”
Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct.
,
29
, pp.
829
849
.
5.
Taylor
,
N.
,
Minnebo
,
P.
,
Bass
,
B. R.
,
Siegele
,
D.
,
Wallin
,
K.
,
Kytka
,
M.
, and
Wintle
,
J.
, 2008, “
Use of Master Curve Technology for Assessing Shallow Flaws in a Reactor Pressure Vessel Material
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
130
, p.
031407
.
6.
Hein
,
H.
,
Keim
,
E.
,
Koban
,
J.
,
Langer
,
R.
, and
Schnabel
,
H.
, 2004, “
Introduction of the Project CARISMA for the Determination of Fracture Mechanical Characteristics by the Aid of Irradiated Materials for all Generations of German PWRs
,”
IAEA Specialists Meeting on Irradiation Effects and Mitigation in Reactor Pressure Vessel Internals
,
Gus Khrustalny
,
Russia
.
7.
Reichel
,
C.
,
Schöner
,
P.
, and
Münch
,
W.
, 2006, “
CFD-Simulation of a UPTF Thermal Mixing Experiment With ANSYS CFX Using URANS and Scale Resolving Turbulence Models
,” Presented at: New Aspects and Developments of Calculations, Evaluations and Assessments in the Field of Reactor Physics, October 23–27, 2006, Garching/Munich.
8.
German Standard for Nuclear Power Plants: KTA 3201.2
, “
Components of the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary of Light Water Reactors, Part 2: Design and Analysis
,” Issue No. 6/96.
9.
German Standard for Nuclear Power Plants: KTA 3201.2
, “
Components of the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary of Light Water Reactors, Part 2: Design and Analysis
,” Draft April 2009.
10.
Varfolomeyev
,
I.
,
Petersilge
,
M.
, and
Busch
,
M.
, 1998, “
Stress Intensity Factors for Internal Circumferential Cracks in Thin- and Thick-Walled Cylinders
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
,
60
, pp.
491
500
.
11.
Busch
,
M.
,
Petersilge
,
M.
, and
Varfolomeyev
,
I.
, 1995, “
Polynomial Influence Functions for Surface Cracks in Pressure Vessel Components
,” Fraunhofer IWM, Halle, Report No. Z 11/95.
12.
Varfolomeyev
,
I.
, and
Beukelmann
,
D.
, 2008, “
Analytical Solutions and Tools for Assessment of Surface Cracks in Cylindrical Components
,
ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference
, July 27–31, 2008,
Chicago, IL
, Paper PVP 2008-61566.
13.
Ferrill
,
D. A.
,
Juhl
,
P. B.
, and
Miller
,
D. R.
, 1966, “
Measurement of Residual Stresses in a Heavy Weldment
,”
Welding Research Supplement, American Welding Society, National Fall Meeting
,
St. Louis, MO
, pp.
504
514
.
14.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, 1999, “
Use of Fracture Toughness Test Data to Establish Reference Temperature for Pressure Retaining Materials Section XI, Division 1
,”
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Case N-629
ASME
,
New York
.
15.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, 1999, “
Use of Fracture Toughness Test Data to Establish Reference Temperature for Pressure Retaining Materials Other than Bolting for Class 1 Vessels Section III, Division 1
,”
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Case N-631
ASME
,
New York
.
16.
Server
,
W. L.
, and
Rosinski
,
S. T.
, 1998, “
Technical Basis for Application of the Master Curve Approach to Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity Assessment
,”
Effects of Radiation on Materials: 19th International Symposium
, June 16–18, Seattle.
17.
Siegele
,
D.
,
Keim.
E.
, and
Nagel
,
G.
, 2008, “
Validation of RTT0 for German Pressure Vessel Steels
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
130
, p.
031405
.
18.
Siegele
,
D.
,
Hohe
,
J.
, and
Friedmann
,
V.
, 2006, “
Experimentelle und numerische Untersuchungen zur Sprödbruchbewertung ferritischer Stähle mit dem Masterkurven-Konzept
,” 32. MPA-Seminar, Stuttgart.
19.
Siegele
,
D.
,
Varfolomeyev
,
I.
, and
Nagel
,
G.
, 2005, “
Brittle Failure Assessment of a PWR-RPV for Normal-Anomalous Operation and Loss of Coolant Accident Loads
,” 2005 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping.
20.
Keim
,
E.
, 2006, “
Constraint Issues in Cleavage Fracture and Matters Arising From Practical Application
,”
Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct.
,
29
, pp.
659
681
.
21.
Siegele
,
D.
,
Varfolomeyev
,
I.
,
Hohe
,
J.
,
Hardenacke
,
V.
, and
Nagel
,
G.
, 2010, “
Integrity Assessment of a German PWR RPV Considering Loss of Constraint
,”
2010 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference
, July 18–22,
Bellevue
, Paper PVP 2010-25615.
22.
Wallin
,
K.
, 2001, “
Quantifying Tstress Controlled Constraint by the Master Curve Transition Temperature T0
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
,
68
, pp.
303
328
.
You do not currently have access to this content.