Abstract

Structural integrity of an in-service component containing damage such as corrosion and thermal hot spot has to be evaluated regularly so as to certify the acceptance and safety of continued service of the component. In this paper, limit load solutions of a damaged conical shell, particularly local wall thinning and thermal hot spot, is investigated. The derived solutions are based on identifying the regions in the damaged component that directly participate in the plastic action (kinematically active). The concepts of reference volume and decay length are employed to identify the kinematically active regions in the damaged conical shell. The different solutions proposed in this paper are compared with the elastic-plastic finite element analysis. The results indicate that proposed solutions can be used with acceptable accuracy to make integrity assessment decisions.

1.
American Petroleum Institute (API)
, 2000, Fitness-for-Service, API 579, Washington, DC.
2.
ASME
, 1984. Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines, American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) B31G.
3.
Seshadri
,
R.
, 2005, “
Integrity Assessment of Pressure Components with Local Hot Spots
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
127
, pp.
137
142
.
4.
Indermohan
,
H.
, and
Seshadri
,
R.
, 2005, “
Fitness-For-Service Methodology Based on Variational Principles in Plasticity
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
127
, pp.
92
97
.
5.
Balakrishnan
,
R.
, and
Seshadri
,
R.
, 2005, “
Fitness for Service Assessment of Corroded Pipelines Based on Variational Principles in Plasticity
,”
The Journal of Pipeline Integrity
,
2
, pp.
99
116
.
6.
Tantichattanont
,
P.
,
Adluri
,
S. M. R.
, and
Seshadri
,
R.
, 2007, “
Structural Integrity Evaluation for Corrosion in Spherical Pressure Vessels
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
0308-0161,
84
, pp.
749
761
.
7.
Ahmad
,
F.
,
Hossain
,
M. M.
, and
Seshadri
,
R.
, 2010, “
Fitness-for-Service Assessment of Hydrocarbon Storage Tanks
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
132
, p.
021207
.
8.
Tantichattanont
,
P.
,
Adluri
,
S. M. R.
, and
Seshadri
,
R.
, 2009, “
Fitness-for-Service Evaluation of Thermal Hot Spots and Corrosion Damage in Cylindrical Pressure Components
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
131
, p.
051206
.
9.
Tantichattanont
,
P.
,
Adluri
,
S. M. R.
, and
Seshadri
,
R.
, 2007, “
Fitness-for-Service Assessment of Spherical Pressure Vessels With Hot Spots
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
0308-0161,
84
, pp.
762
772
.
10.
Nerubailo
,
B. V.
, and
Ol’shanskii
,
V. P.
, 2007, “
Asymptotic Method for Analysis of a Conical Shell under Local Loading
,”
Mech. Solids
0025-6544,
42
, pp.
429
436
.
11.
Mura
,
T.
,
Rimawi
,
W. H.
, and
Lee
,
S. L.
, 1965, “
Extended Theorems of Limit Analysis
,”
Q. Appl. Math.
0033-569X,
23
, pp.
171
179
.
12.
Seshadri
,
R.
, and
Mangalaramanan
,
S. P.
, 1997, “
Lower Bound Limit Load Using Variational Concepts: The mα-Method
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
0308-0161,
71
, pp.
93
106
.
13.
Seshadri
,
R.
, and
Adibi-Asl
,
R.
, 2007, “
Limit Loads of Pressure Components Using the Reference Two-bar Structure
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
129
, pp.
280
286
.
14.
Seshadri
,
R.
, and
Hossain
,
M. M.
, 2009, “
Simplified Limit Load Determination Using the mα-Tangent Method
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
131
, p.
021213
.
15.
ANSYS Inc.
, 2008, ANSYS Ver. 11.0 Online User Guide.
You do not currently have access to this content.