The tube-to-tubesheet joint strength is measured in terms of residual contact pressure between the tube’s outer surface and tubesheet hole surfaces. The joint integrity is affected by several design parameters, including the type of tube and tubesheet materials, the level of expansion, and the initial radial clearance between the tube and tubesheet. In the present work, an axisymmetric finite element model based on the sleeve diameter and rigid roller concepts is developed. The model has been used to evaluate the combined effects of clearance, wall reduction level, and strain hardening of tube and tubesheet materials on the interfacial pressure between tube and tubesheet. The finite element results show that the initial clearance effect is dependent on the strain hardening capability of the tube material. For low strain hardening tube materials, the interfacial pressure remains almost constant well above the Tubular Exchanger Manufacturing Association maximum radial over tolerance of 0.0254mm(0.001in.). These results are validated by the experimental data developed during the research program. As expected, a drastic reduction in joint strength is observed at high values of radial clearances. The cutoff clearance (clearance at which the interfacial pressure starts to drop) is found to vary linearly with tube material hardening level. The residual pressure is found to increase slightly for moderate strain hardening tube materials but shows lower cutoff clearances. Wall reductions ranging from 1% to 12% were utilized in calculating the contact pressure as a function of radial clearance. The results show that for low strain hardening materials the optimum value of residual contact stress is obtained for the industry recommended value of 5%. Finally, because of the absence of plastic deformation in the ligament, the level of tubesheet material strain hardening does not have any noticeable effect on the joint strength.

1.
Standard of the Tubular Exchanger Manufacturer Association
, 1988,
7th ed.
,
TEMA
,
New York
.
2.
Aufaure
,
M.
, 1987, “
Analysis of Residual Stresses Due to Roll-Expansion Process: Finite Element Computation and Validation by Experimental Tests
,”
Transaction of the Ninth International Conference of SMIRT
, pp.
499
503
.
3.
Updike
,
D. P.
,
Kalnins
,
A.
, and
Caldwell
,
S. M.
, 1992, “
Residual Stresses in Transition Zone of Heat Exchanger Tubes
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
114
, pp.
149
156
.
4.
Andrieux
,
S.
, and
Voldoire
,
F.
, 1995, “
Stress Identification in Steam Generator Tubes From Profile Measurements
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
0029-5493,
158
, pp.
417
427
.
5.
Cizelj
,
L.
, and
Mavko
,
B.
, 1995, “
Propagation of Stress Corrosion Cracks in Steam Generator Tubes
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
0308-0161,
63
, pp.
35
43
.
6.
Williams
,
D. K.
, 1996, “
Prediction of Residual Stresses in the Mechanically Expanded 0.750” Diameter Steam Generator Tube Plugs—Part 1: 2-D Solution
,”
Residual Stresses in Design, Fabrication, Assessment and Repair
, Vol.
327
,
ASME
,
New York
, pp.
173
180
.
7.
Williams
,
D. K.
, 2003, “
Prediction of Residual Stresses in the Mechanical Roll of HX Tubes Into TEMA Grooves
,”
Design and Analysis Methods and Fitness for Service
,
ASME
,
New York
, pp.
121
29
.
8.
Williams
,
D. K.
, 1997, “
Prediction of Residual Stresses in the Mechanically Expanded 0.750” Diameter Steam Generator Tube Plugs—Part 2: 3-D Solution
,”
Current Topics in the Design and Analysis of Pressure Vessels and Piping
, Vol.
354
,
ASME
,
New York
, pp.
17
28
.
9.
Allam
,
M.
,
Chaaban
,
A.
, and
Bazergui
,
A.
, 1998, “
Estimation of Residual Stresses in Hydraulically Expanded Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
120
, pp.
129
137
.
10.
Allam
,
M.
, and
Bazergui
,
A.
, 2002, “
Axial Strength of Tube-to Tubesheet Joints: Finite Element and Experimental Evaluations
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
124
, pp.
23
31
.
11.
Merah
,
N.
,
Al-Zayer
,
A.
,
Shuaib
,
A.
, and
Arif
,
A.
, 2003, “
Finite Element Evaluation of Clearance Effect on Tube-to-Tubesheet Joint Strength
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
0308-0161,
80
, pp.
879
885
.
12.
2004, ANSYS, Version 9.0, Program and Help Documentations, Swanson Analysis System, Inc.
13.
Scott
,
D. A.
,
Wolgemuth
,
G. A.
, and
Aikin
,
J. A.
, 1984, “
Hydraulically Expanded Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
106
, pp.
104
109
.
14.
Kohlpaintner
,
W. R.
, 1995, “
Calculation of Hydraulically Expanded Tube-to-Tubesheet Joint
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
117
, pp.
24
30
.
15.
Chaaban
,
A.
,
Ma
,
H.
, and
Bazergui
,
A.
, 1992, “
Tube-Tubesheet Joint: A Proposed Equation for the Equivalent Sleeve Diameter Used in the Single-Tube Model
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
114
, pp.
19
22
.
16.
Reinhardt
,
W. D.
, 2001, “
Yield Criteria for the Elastic-Plastic Design of the Tubesheet With Triangular Penetration Pattern
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
123
, pp.
118
123
.
17.
Shuaib
,
A. N.
, Merah N.,
Khraisheh
,
M. K.
,
Allam
,
I. M.
, and
Al-Anizi
,
S. S.
, 2003, “
Experimental Investigation of Heat Exchanger Tubesheet Hole Enlargement
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
125
, pp.
19
25
.
18.
Al-Aboodi
,
A.
,
Merah
,
N.
,
Shuaib
,
A. N.
,
Al-Nassar
,
Y.
, and
Al-Anizi
,
S. S.
, 2006, “
FEA of the Effects of Initial Tube-Tubesheet Clearance, Wall Reduction and Material Strain Hardening on Rolled Joint Strength
,”
Proceedings of PVP2006-ICPT-11, ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference
, July 23–27,
Vancouver, BC
,
Canada
.
19.
2005, Tube Cleaners & Expanders Airetool® Manual by Cooper, Power Tools, SP-1100EN0 405-10M, June 27 (http://www.coopertools.com/catalog/pdffiles/SP-1100_en.pdfhttp://www.coopertools.com/catalog/pdffiles/SP-1100_en.pdf).
20.
Jawad
,
M. H.
,
Clarkin
,
E. J.
, and
Schuessler
,
R. E.
, 1987, “
Evaluation of Tube-to-Tubesheet Junctions
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
109
, pp.
19
26
.
21.
Metzger
,
D. R.
,
Sauve
,
R. G.
, and
Nadeau
,
E.
, 1995, “
Prediction of Residual Stress by Simulation of the Rolled Joint Manufacturing Process for Steam Generators
,”
Current Topics in Computational Mechanics
, Vol.
305
,
ASME
,
New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.