The European Creep Collaborative Committee (ECCC) approach to creep data assessment has now been established for almost ten years. The methodology covers the analysis of rupture strength and ductility, creep strain, and stress relaxation data, for a range of material conditions. This paper reviews the concepts and procedures involved. The original approach was devised to determine data sheets for use by committees responsible for the preparation of National and International Design and Product Standards, and the methods developed for data quality evaluation and data analysis were therefore intentionally rigorous. The focus was clearly on the determination of long-time property values from the largest possible data sets involving a significant number of observations in the mechanism regime for which predictions were required. More recently, the emphasis has changed. There is now an increasing requirement for full property descriptions from very short times to very long and hence the need for much more flexible model representations than were previously required. There continues to be a requirement for reliable long-time predictions from relatively small data sets comprising relatively short duration tests, in particular, to exploit new alloy developments at the earliest practical opportunity. In such circumstances, it is not feasible to apply the same degree of rigor adopted for large data set assessment. Current developments are reviewed.

1.
Thornton
,
D. V.
, 2000, “
Activities of the European Creep Collaborative Committee
,”
Proceedings of the Fifth on Advanced Materials for 21st Century Turbines and Power Plant, Churchill College
,
Cambridge
, Jul. 3–7, pp.
123
128
.
2.
ECCC Recommendations
, 2005, “
Creep Data Validation and Assessment Procedures
,” www.ommi.co.uk/etd/eccc/open.htmwww.ommi.co.uk/etd/eccc/open.htm, Vols.
1–9
.
3.
Holdsworth
,
S. R.
, and
Merckling
,
G.
, 1996, “
Reducing the Uncertainty in Long Term Creep Rupture Strength Predictions
,”
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Creep & Fatigue—Design and Life Assessment at High Temperatures
,
I.Mech.E
,
London
, Apr. 16–18, Paper No. C494∕087.
4.
Holdsworth
,
S. R.
, 1999, “
Recent Developments in the Assessment of Creep-Rupture Data
,”
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Creep and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures
,
Tsukuba
, Apr. 11, JSME, pp.
1
8
.
5.
Holdsworth
,
S. R.
, and
Merckling
,
G.
, 2003, “
ECCC Developments in the Assessment of Creep-Rupture Properties
,”
Proceedings of the International Charles Parsons Turbine Conference on Engineering Issues in Turbine Machinery, Power Plant & Renewables
,
Trinity College
,
Dublin
, Sept. 16–18, pp.
411
426
.
6.
EN 10291
, 2000, Metallic Materials, Uniaxial Creep Testing in Tension, Method of Test, European Norm.
7.
Holdsworth
,
S. R.
, 2006, “
Development and Current Status of ECCC Creep Property Data Sheets
,”
Proceedings of Eighth Liège Conference on Material for Advanced Power Engineering
,
Liège
, Sept. 18-20, Vol.
I
, pp.
91
105
.
8.
ECCC Data Sheets
, 2005, “
Rupture Strength, Creep Strength, and Relaxation Strength Values for Carbon-manganese, Low Alloy Ferritic, High Alloy Ferritic and Austenitic Steels, Nickel Base Alloys and High Temperature Bolting Steels∕Alloys
,” www.ommi.co.uk/etd/eccc/open.htmwww.ommi.co.uk/etd/eccc/open.htm
9.
Granacher
,
J.
, and
Schwienheer
,
M.
, 2005, “
Assessment Procedure Document for Graphical Multi-Heat Averaging and Cross-plotting Method
,” Appendix D4 in ECCC Recommendations Vol.
5
, Part Ia (see Ref. 2).
10.
ISO 6303
, 1981, “
Annex: Method of Extrapolation Used in Analysis of Creep-Rupture Data
,” International Standards Organisation.
11.
BS PD-6605
, 1998,
Guidance on Methodology for the Assessment of Stress-Rupture Data
, British Standards Institution.
12.
Granacher
,
J.
, and
Monsees
,
M.
, 2005, “
Assessment Procedure Document for DESA
,” Appendix D2 in ECCC Recommendations Vol.
5
, Part Ia (see Ref. 2).
13.
Larson
,
F. R.
, and
Miller
,
J.
, 1952, “
A Time-Temperature Relationship for Rupture and Creep Stress
,”
Trans. ASME
0097-6822,
74
, pp.
765
775
.
14.
Manson
,
S. S.
, and
Haferd
,
A. M.
, 1953, “
A Linear Time-Temperature Relation for Extrapolation of Creep and Stress Rupture Data
,” NASA-TN-2890.
15.
Orr
,
R. L.
,
Sherby
,
O. D.
, and
Dorn
,
J. E.
, 1954, “
Correlation of Rupture Data for Metals at Elevated Temperatures
,”
Trans. ASME
0097-6822,
46
, pp.
113
128
.
16.
Mendelson
,
A.
,
Roberts
,
E.
, and
Manson
,
S. S.
, 1965, “
Optimisation of Time-Temperature Parameters for Creep and Stress Rupture, With Application to Data From German Cooperative Long Time Creep Program
,” NASA-TN-D-2975.
17.
Trunin
,
I. I.
,
Golobova
,
N. G.
, and
Loginov
,
E. A.
, 1971, “
New Method of Extrapolation of Creep Test and Long Time Strength Results
,”
Proceedings of Fourth International Symposium on Heat Resistant Metallic Materials
,
Mala Fatra, CSSR
, p.
168
.
18.
Manson
,
S. S.
, and
Muraldihan
,
U.
, 1983, “
Analysis of Creep-Rupture Data for the Five Multi-Heat Alloys by the Minmum Commitment Method Using Double Heat Term Centering Techniques
,” Final Report of Res. Proj. 638–1, No. EPRI CS-3171.
19.
Holdsworth
,
S. R.
, and
Davies
,
R. B.
, 1997, “
A Recent Advance in the Assessment of Creep Rupture Data
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
0029-5493,
190
, pp.
287
296
.
20.
Bullough
,
C. K.
, and
Holdsworth
,
S. R.
, 1996, “
New Strategies for the Assessment of Long-Term Data From Interrupted Creep Tests
,”
Proceedings Conference on Life Assessment and Life Extension of Engineering Plant, Structures and Components
,
Churchill College
,
Cambridge
, Sept.
21.
Scholz
,
A.
,
Schwienher
,
M.
, and
Znajda
,
R.
, 2005, “
Scatterband Assessment Methods for Creep and Fatigue Data
,”
Proceedings of Eighth International Conference on Operating Pressure Equipment
,
Melbourne
, May.
22.
Spindler
,
M. W.
, 2004, “
The Multiaxial and Uniaxial Creep Ductility of Type 304 Steel as a Function of Stress and Strain Rate
,”
Mater. High. Temp.
0960-3409,
21
(
1
), pp.
47
54
.
23.
Holdsworth
,
S. R.
,
Askins
,
M.
,
Baker
,
A.
,
Gariboldi
,
E.
,
Holmström
,
S.
,
Klenk
,
A.
,
Ringel
,
M.
,
Merckling
,
G.
,
Sandström
,
R.
,
Schwienheer
,
M.
, and
Spigarelli
,
S.
, 2005, “
Factors Influencing Creep Model Equation Selection
,”
Proc. ECCC Conf. on Creep & Fracture in High Temperature Components—Design & Life Assessment Issues
, London, 12∕14-Sept-2005,
380
393
.
24.
Mayer
,
K. H.
, and
König
,
H.
, 1993, “
High Temperature Bolting for 1100F Coal-Fired Power Plants—EPRI Project RP1403-15∕23
,”
Proceedings of International Symposium on Improved Technology for Fossil Power Plants—New and Retrofit Applications
,
Washington
, Mar. 1–3.
25.
EN 10319
, 2000, Metallic Material, Tensile Stress Relaxation Testing, European Norm.
26.
Feltham
,
P.
, 1961, “
Stress Relaxation in Copper and Alpha-Brasses at Low Temperatures
.”
J. Jpn. Inst. Met.
0021-4876,
89
, pp.
210
214
.
27.
Conway
,
J. B.
,
Stentz
,
R. H.
, and
Berling
,
J. T.
, 1975, “
Fatigue, Tensile and Relaxation Behaviour of Stainless Steels
,” TID-26135 Technical Information Centre USAEC.
You do not currently have access to this content.