Distinctive mechanical behavior of bolted joints is caused by the helical shape of thread geometry. Recently, a number of papers have been published to elucidate the strength or loosening phenomena of bolted joints using three-dimensional finite element analysis. In most cases, mesh generations of the bolted joints are implemented with the help of commercial software. The mesh patterns so obtained are, therefore, not necessarily adequate for analyzing the stress concentration and contact pressure distributions, which are the primary concerns when designing bolted joints. In this paper, an effective mesh generation scheme is proposed, which can provide helical thread models with accurate geometry to analyze specific characteristics of stress concentrations and contact pressure distributions caused by the helical thread geometry. Using the finite element (FE) models with accurate thread geometry, it is shown how the thread root stress and contact pressure vary along the helix and at the nut loaded surface in the circumferential direction and why the second peak appears in the distribution of Mises stress at thread root. The maximum stress occurs at the bolt thread root located half a pitch from nut loaded surface, and the axial load along engaged threads shows a different distribution pattern from those obtained by axisymmetric FE analysis and elastic theory. It is found that the second peak of Mises stress around the top face of nut is due to the distinctive distribution pattern of σz.

1.
Fukuoka
,
T.
, 1997, “
Evaluation of the Method for Lowering Stress Concentration at the Thread Root of Bolted Joints With Modifications of Nut Shape
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930
119
(
1
), pp.
1
9
.
2.
Fukuoka
,
T.
, and
Takaki
,
T.
, 2003, “
Elastic Plastic Finite Element Analysis of Bolted Joint During Tightening Process
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472
125
(
4
), pp.
823
830
.
3.
Lehnhoff
,
T. F.
,
Ko
,
K. I.
, and
Mckay
,
M. L.
, 1994, “
Member Stiffness and Contact Pressure Distribution of Bolted Joints
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472
116
(
2
), pp.
550
557
.
4.
Lehnhoff
,
T. F.
, and
Bunyard
,
B. A.
, 2000, “
Bolt Thread and Head Fillet Stress Concentration Factors
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930
122
(
2
), pp.
180
185
.
5.
Chen
,
J.
, and
Shih
,
Y.
, 1999, “
A Study of the Helical Effect on the Thread Connection by Three Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
0029-5493
191
, pp.
109
116
.
6.
Bahai
,
H.
, and
Esat
,
I. I.
, 1994, “
A Hybrid Model for Analysis of Complex Stress Distribution in Threaded Connectors
,”
Comput. Struct.
0045-7949
52
(
1
), pp.
79
93
.
7.
Rhee
,
H. C.
, 1990, “
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Threaded Joint
,”
Proceedings of the Nintu International Confedence on Offshore Mechanics Arctic and Engineering
, Vol.
3
, Pt. A, pp.
293
297
.
8.
Zadoks
,
R. I.
, and
Kokatam
,
D. P. R.
, 1999, “
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model of a Threaded Connection
,”
Comput. Model. Simul. Eng.
1083-3455
4
(
4
), pp.
274
281
.
9.
Zhang
,
M.
, and
Jiang
,
Y.
, 2004, “
Finite Element Modeling of Self-Loosening of Bolted Joints
,”
PVP (Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.)
0277-027X,
478
, pp.
19
27
.
10.
Fukuoka
,
T.
,
Yamasaki
,
N.
,
Kitagawa
,
H.
, and
Hamada
,
M.
, 1986, “
Stresses in Bolt and Nut—Effects of Contact Conditions at the First Ridge-
,”
Bull. JSME
0021-3764
29
(
256
), pp.
3275
3279
.
11.
Yamamoto
,
A.
, 1970,
Theory and Practice of the Tightening Process of Screw Threads
,
Yokendo
,
Tokyo
, pp.
1
2
(in Japanese).
You do not currently have access to this content.