A series of fire tests were conducted on nine, $1.8m3$$(500USgal)$ ASME code propane pressure vessels to study the significance of pressure relief valve behavior on tank survivability to fire impingement. In these tests three tanks ruptured (i.e., finite failure) and six boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion (BLEVEd) (total loss of containment). The difference between the BLEVE and non-BLEVE failures was due to a difference in the fire conditions. It is believed that these tests show some insight into the BLEVE process. In all tests the fire consisted of an array of nominal $590kW$$(2MBTU∕h)$ liquid propane burners. A pool fire was not used because of the uncontrolled nature of open pool fires. It was believed that very repeatable fire conditions could be achieved by using a series of burners. In the tests where the outcome was a non-BLEVE there were two burners mounted $30cm$ above the tank on the tank vapor space. These burners were used to weaken the steel and to initiate a failure. To heat the liquid, there were between 4 and 12 burners applied below the liquid level. When one burner was added on the vapor space, all of the remaining tanks BLEVEd. This was true over a range of fill levels (at failure) of between 10% and 50% by volume. It is believed this added burner was just enough to weaken the tank so that any initial rupture would grow towards a total loss of containment and BLEVE. This paper presents the details of this test series and shows how severely heated length and liquid energy affected the outcome.

1.
Birk
,
A. M.
,
Cunningham
,
M. H.
,
Ostic
,
P.
, and
Hiscoke
,
B.
, 1997, “
Fire Tests of Propane Tanks to Study BLEVEs and Other Thermal Ruptures: Detailed Analysis of Medium Scale Test Results
2.
Ogiso
,
C.
,
Takagi
,
N.
, and
Kitagawa
,
T.
, 1972, “
On the Mechanism of Vapor Explosion, Loss Prevention and Safety Symposium
,” PACHEC, Japan, Session 9, pp.
233
240
.
3.
Barbone
,
R.
,
Frost
,
D. L.
,
Makis
,
A.
, and
Nerenberg
,
J.
, 1994, “
Explosive Boiling of a Depressurized Volatile Liquid
,”
Proceedings of IUTAM Symposium on Waves in Liquid/Gas and Liquid Vapour Two-Phase Systems
, Kyoto, Japan.
4.
Birk
,
A. M.
,
VanderSteen
,
J. D. J.
,
Davison
,
C.
,
Cunningham
,
M. H.
, and
,
I.
, 2003, “
PRV Field Trials—The Effects of Fire Conditions and PRV Blowdown on Propane Tank Survivability in a Fire
5.
Venart
,
J. E. S.
, 2000, “
Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor Explosion: Possible Failure Mechanisms and Their Consequences
,” Institute of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series, Hazards XV: The Process, its Safety and the Environment.
6.
Birk
,
A. M.
, and
Cunningham
,
M. H.
, 1994, “
A Medium Scale Experimental Study of the Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapour Explosion
7.
Birk
,
A. M.
,
Cunningham
,
M. H.
,
VanderSteen
,
J. D. J.
,
Davison
,
C.
, and
,
I.
, 2002, “
Fire Tests to Study the Effect of Pressure Relief Valve Behaviour on the Survivability of Propane Tanks in Fires
,” 36th Loss Prevention Symposium, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York.
8.
Birk
,
A. M.
, 1983, “
Development and Validation of a Mathematical Model of a Rail Tank-Car Engulfed in Fire
,” Department of Mechanical Engineering, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
9.
Townsend
,
W.
,
Anderson
,
C. E.
,
Zook
,
J.
,
Cowgill
,
G.
, 1974, “
Comparison of Thermally Coated and Uninsulated Rail Tank-Cars Filled With LPG Subjected to a Fire Environment
,” FRA-OR&D 75-32, U.S. DOT Report.
10.
1994,
Guidelines for Evaluating the Characteristics of Vapor Cloud Explosions, Flash Fires and BLEVEs
,
AIChE Centre for Chemical Process Safety
, New York.
11.
Reid
,
R. C.
, 1979, “
Possible Mechanism for Pressurized Liquid Tank Explosions or BLEVEs
,”
Science
0036-8075
203
, pp.
1263
1265
.
12.
Baum
,
M. R.
, and
Butterfield
,
J. M.
, 1979, “
Studies of the Depressurization of Gas Pressurized Pipes During Rupture
,”
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
0022-2542,
21
(
4
), pp.
253
261
.