Tube hydroforming is an attractive manufacturing process in the automotive industry because it has several advantages over alternative methods. In order to determine the reliability of the process, a new method to assess the probability of failure is proposed in this paper. The method is based on the reliability theory and the forming limit diagram, which has been extensively used in metal forming as the criteria of formability. From the forming limit band in the forming limit diagram, the reliability of the forming process can be evaluated. A tube hydroforming process of free bulging is then introduced as an example to illustrate the approach. The results show this technique to be an innovative approach to avoid failure during tube hydroforming.

1.
Dohmann
,
F.
, and
Hartl
,
C.
, 1996, “
Hydroforming—A Method to Manufacture Light-Weight Parts
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
60
(
1–4
), pp.
669
676
.
2.
Ahmetoglu
,
M.
, and
Altan
,
T.
, 2000, “
Tube Hydroforming: State-of-the-Art and Future Trends
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
98
(
1
), pp.
25
33
.
3.
Sing
,
W. M.
, and
Rao
,
K. P.
, 1993, “
Predication of Sheet-Metal Formability Using Tensile-Test Results
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
37
, pp.
37
51
.
4.
Xing
,
H. L.
, and
Makinouchi
,
A.
, 2001, “
Numerical Analysis and Design for Tubular Hydroforming
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
0020-7403,
43
, pp.
1009
1026
.
5.
Koc
,
M.
, and
Altan
,
T.
, 2002, “
Prediction of Forming Limits and Parameters in the Tube Hydroforming Process
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
0890-6955,
42
, pp.
123
138
.
6.
Nefussi
,
G.
, and
Combescure
,
A.
, 2002, “
Coupled Buckling and Plastic Instability for Tube Hydroforming
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
0020-7403,
44
, pp.
899
914
.
7.
Stoughton
,
T. B.
, 2000, “
A General Forming Limit Criterion for Sheet Metal Forming
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
0020-7403,
42
, pp.
1
27
.
8.
Janssens
,
K.
, and
Lambert
,
F.
, 2001, “
Statistical Evaluation of the Uncertainty of Experimentally Characterised Forming Limits of Sheet Steel
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
112
, pp.
174
184
.
9.
Kapur
,
K. C.
, and
Lamberson
,
L. R.
, 1977,
Reliability in Engineering Design
,
Wiley
,
New York.
10.
Li
,
B.
,
Zhang
,
Y.
, and
Zhu
,
M. L.
, 1999, “
A Study on the Structure Design and Reliability of Cylinder Head for Vehicle Engines
,” SAE No.1999–01–0828.
11.
Sauve
,
R. G.
, 1999, “
H3DMAP Version 6—A General Three-Dimensional Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of Structures
,” Ontario Hydro Technologies Report No. A-NSG-96–120, Revision 1, Toronto, Canada.
12.
Manabe
,
K.
, and
Amino
,
M.
, 2002, “
Effects of Process Parameters and Material Properties on Deformation Process in Tube Hydroforming
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
123
, pp.
285
291
.
13.
Yoshitomi
,
Y.
, 1987, “
Estimation Method for Application of Bulge Forming to Circular Tubes
,”
J. Jpn. Soc. Technol. Plast.
0038-1586,
28
(
316
), pp.
432
437
.
14.
Koç, M., and
Altan
,
T.
, 2002, “
Application of Two Dimensional (2D) FEA for the Tube Hydroforming Process
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
0890-6955,
42
, pp.
1285
1295
.
15.
Carleer
,
B.
,
Kevie
,
G. V. D.
,
Winter
,
L. D.
, and
Veldhuizen
,
B. V.
, 2000, “
Analysis of the Effect of Material Properties on the Hydroforming Process of Tubes
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
104
, pp.
158
166
.
16.
Hwang
,
Y. M.
, and
Lin
,
Y. K.
, 2002, “
Analysis and Finite Element Simulation of the Tube Bulge Hydroforming Process
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
125–126
, pp.
821
825
.
You do not currently have access to this content.