The ASME Section III Design-by-Analysis rules for pressure-retaining components include a detailed fatigue evaluation based on elastically predicted primary, secondary, and peak stresses. A prerequisite for the fatigue analysis is that the primary-plus-secondary stress range does not exceed . If this limit is exceeded, the code provides “Simplified Elastic-Plastic Analysis” rules for the fatigue evaluation. A penalty factor is applied to the elastically predicted alternating stress. The maximum value of (3.3 or 5) is a severe design limitation. Test data indicate that the code specified maximum value of is very conservative. The simplified elastic-plastic rules were originally developed for piping and published in B31.7. When the piping rules were incorporated into Section III in 1971, the B31.7 procedure was replaced by a less complex procedure. The development of the simplified elastic-plastic analysis approach is reviewed to establish the technical basis for the present code rules. The concepts of fatigue, shakedown to elastic action, thermal bending, elastic follow-up, notch factor, and strain redistribution are discussed. Recommendations for changes to the plastic strain correction factor are provided.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: slagisg@asme.org
Article navigation
February 2006
Research Papers
Meaning of in Design-by-Analysis Fatigue Evaluation
Gerry C. Slagis
e-mail: slagisg@asme.org
Gerry C. Slagis
G C Slagis Associates
, 258 Hillcrest Place, Pleasant Hill, California 94523
Search for other works by this author on:
Gerry C. Slagis
G C Slagis Associates
, 258 Hillcrest Place, Pleasant Hill, California 94523e-mail: slagisg@asme.org
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. Feb 2006, 128(1): 8-16 (9 pages)
Published Online: October 26, 2005
Article history
Received:
September 9, 2005
Revised:
October 26, 2005
Citation
Slagis, G. C. (October 26, 2005). "Meaning of in Design-by-Analysis Fatigue Evaluation." ASME. J. Pressure Vessel Technol. February 2006; 128(1): 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2140798
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Latent Pitfalls in Microstructure-Based Modeling for Thermally Aged 9Cr-1Mo-V Steel (Grade 91)
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
Thermal Stress Analysis of Compact Heat Exchanger Produced by Additive Manufacturing
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
An Improved Model for Predicting Affected Region of Flashing Jet
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
Crack Growth Prediction Based on Uncertain Parameters Using Ensemble Kalman Filter
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
Related Articles
Characterizing the Wave Environment in the Fatigue Analysis of Flexible Risers
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (May,2006)
A Reliability-Based Expression of ASME B&PV Code Equation (11) for Class 2 and 3 Nuclear Pipes
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (October,2010)
The Influence of the Initial Ovality Tolerance on the Nonlinear Cycling Analysis of Piping Bends
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2009)
Recommended Revisions to Nuclear Piping Thermal Expansion Stress Limits
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (April,2011)
Related Chapters
Openings
Guidebook for the Design of ASME Section VIII Pressure Vessels
Openings
Guidebook for the Design of ASME Section VIII Pressure Vessels, Third Edition
Subsection NB, NC, ND-3600 Piping
Online Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes