The ASME Section III design-by-analysis approach provides stress criteria for the design of nuclear components. Stresses are calculated elastically for the most part, although plastic analysis is recognized. Limits are specified for primary, secondary, and peak stresses. Inherent in these limits are factors of safety against several modes of failure. The purpose of this paper is to explain the design-by-analysis criteria and fundamental concepts behind the approach. Topics covered include the bases for the primary stress limits, shakedown to elastic action, fatigue, simplified elastic-plastic analysis, and thermal stress ratchet. Issues that are explored are separating primary and secondary stresses in finite element analyses, material ductility requirements, and the meaning of the fatigue penalty factor.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Keywords:
nuclear engineering, fission reactor design, thermal stresses, ductility, design engineering, finite element analysis, stress analysis, fatigue, elastoplasticity
Topics:
Design, Stress
1.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III, 1963 Edition, “
Rules for Construction of Nuclear Vessels
.”
2.
Criteria of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for Design by Analysis in Sections III and VIII, Division 2, 1969, ASME.
3.
USA Standard Code for Pressure Piping, “
Nuclear Power Piping
,” USAS B31.7–1969, ASME.
4.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III, 2001 Edition, “
Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components
.”
5.
Bohm
,
G. J.
, and
Stevenson
,
J. D.
, 1982, “
Extreme Loads and Their Evaluation With ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Limits
,” Pressure Vessel and Piping: Design Technology—1982—A Decade of Progress,
ASME
, pp.
415
–
418
.
6.
Slagis
,
G. C.
, 1991, “
Basis of Current Dynamic Stress Criteria for Piping
,”
Weld. Res. Counc. Bull.
0043-2326,
367
, pp.
15
–
16
.
7.
Burrows
,
W. R.
,
Michel
,
R.
, and
Rankin
,
A. W.
, 1952, “
A Wall Thickness Formula for High-Pressure, High-Temperature Piping
,” ASME Paper No. 52-A-151, p.
6
.
8.
Langer
,
B. F.
, 1972, “
PVRC Interpretive Report of Pressure Vessel Research, Section I—Design Considerations
,” in
Pressure Vessel and Piping: Design and Analysis, A Decade of Progress, Volume 1, Analysis
,
ASME
,
New York
, pp.
8
–
60
[reprinted from
Weld. Res. Counc. Bull.
0043-2326,
95
, 1964].
9.
Langer
,
B. F.
, 1972, “
Design-Stress Basis for Pressure Vessels
,” in
Pressure Vessel and Piping: Design and Analysis, A Decade of Progress, Volume 1, Analysis
,
ASME
,
New York
, pp.
84
–
94
[reprinted from
Exp. Mech.
0014-4851, 1971].
10.
Miller
,
D. R.
, 1959, “
Thermal-Stress Ratchet Mechanism in Pressure Vessels
,”
J. Basic Eng.
0021-9223,
81
, pp.
190
–
196
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
11.
Bree
,
J.
, 1967, “
Elastic-Plastic Behavior of Thin Tubes Subjected to Internal Pressure and Intermittent High-Heat Fluxes with Application to Fast-Nuclear-Reactor Fuel Elements
,”
J. Strain Anal.
0022-4758,
2
(
3
), pp.
226
–
238
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
12.
Gross
,
J. H.
, 1972, “
PVRC Interpretive Report of Pressure Vessel Research, Section 2—Material Considerations
,” in
Pressure Vessel and Piping: Design and Analysis, A Decade of Progress, Volume 3, Materials and Fabrication
,
ASME
,
New York
, pp.
4
–
34
[reprinted from
Weld. Res. Counc. Bull.
0043-2326,
95
, 1964].
13.
Hechmer
,
J. L.
, and
Hollinger
,
G. L.
, 1998, “
3D Stress Criteria Guidelines for Application
,”
Weld. Res. Counc. Bull.
0043-2326,
429
.
14.
Grandemange
,
J. M.
,
Heliot
,
J.
,
Vagner
,
J.
,
Morel
,
A.
, and
Faidy
,
C.
, 1991, “
Improvements on Fatigue Analysis Methods for the Design of Nuclear Components Subjected to the French RCC-M Code
,”
Weld. Res. Counc. Bull.
0043-2326,
361
.
15.
Slagis
,
G. C.
, 2005, “
Meaning of Ke in Design-by-Analysis Fatigue Evaluation
,” PVP2005-71420.
16.
Tagart
,
S. W.
, 1972, “
Plastic Fatigue Analysis of Pressure Components
,” in
Pressure Vessel and Piping: Design and Analysis, A Decade of Progress, Volume 1, Analysis
,
ASME
,
New York
, pp.
209
–
226
[reprint of ASME Paper No. 68-PVP-3, 1968].
Copyright © 2006
 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.