The existing lower bound limit load determination methods, that are based on linear elastic analysis such as the classical and $mα$-multiplier methods, have a dependence on the maximum equivalent stress. These methods are therefore sensitive to localized plastic action, which occurs in components with thin or slender construction, or those containing notches and cracks. Sensitivity manifests itself as relatively poor lower bounds during the initial elastic iterations of the elastic modulus adjustment procedures, or oscillatory behavior of the multiplier during successive elastic iterations leading to limited accuracy. The $mβ$-multiplier method proposed in this paper starts out with Mura’s inequality that relates the upper bound to the exact multiplier by making use of the “integral mean of yield.” The formulation relies on a “reference parameter” that is obtained from considering a distribution of stress rather than a single maximum equivalent stress. As a result, good limit load estimates have been obtained for several pressure component configurations.

1.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 2001, Section III, ASME, New York.
2.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 2001, Section VIII, ASME, New York.
3.
Webster, G., and Ainsworth, R. A., 1994, High Temperature Component Life Assessment, Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
4.
Ainsworth, R. A., Dean, D. W., and Budden, P. J., 2000, “Development in Creep Fracture Assessments within the R5 Procedure,” IUTAM Symposium on Creep in Structures, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 321–330.
5.
PD6539:1994, 1994, Guide to Methods for the Assessment of the Influence of Crack Growth on the Significance of Design in Component Operating at High Temperature, BSI, London, UK.
6.
,
R.
,
1991
, “
The Generalized Local Stress Strain (GLOSS) Analysis-Theory and Applications
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
113
, pp.
219
227
.
7.
Marriott, D. L., 1988, “Evaluation of Deformation and Load Control of Stresses under Inelastic Conditions using Elastic Finite Element Stress Analysis,” Codes and Standards for Design and Analysis of Pressure Vessel and Piping Components, ASME PVP-Vol. 136, pp. 3–9.
8.
Mackenzie
,
D.
, and
Boyle
,
J. T.
,
1993
, “
A Method of Estimating Limit Loads Using Elastic Analysis, I: Simple Examples
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
53
, pp.
77
85
.
9.
Ponter
,
A. R. S.
,
Fuschi
,
P.
, and
Engelhardt
,
M.
,
2000
, “
Limit Analysis for a General Class of Yield Conditions
,”
Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids
,
19
, pp.
401
421
.
10.
Mura
,
T.
,
Rimawi
,
W. H.
, and
Lee
,
S. L.
,
1965
, “
Extended Theorems of Limit Analysis
,”
Q. Appl. Math.
,
23
, pp.
171
179
.
11.
,
R.
, and
Mangalaramanan
,
S. P.
,
1997
, “
Lower Bound Limit Loads Using Variational Concepts: The -Method
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
71
, pp.
93
106
.
12.
Pan
,
L.
, and
,
R.
,
2002
, “
Limit Load Estimation using Plastic Flow Parameter in Repeated Elastic Finite Element Analyses
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
124
, pp.
433
439
.
13.
Reinhardt
,
W. D.
, and
,
R.
,
2003
, “
Limit Load Bounds for the -Multiplier
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
125
, pp.
34
56
.
14.
ANSYS Engineering Analysis System User’s Manual, 1992, Rev. 5.6. Swanson Analysis System, Houston, PA.