The Seismic Design Code for High Pressure Gas Facilities was established in 1982 in advance of those in other industrial fields, the only exception being that for nuclear power plants. In 1995, Hyogoken Nanbu earthquake caused approximately 6000 deaths and more than $1 billion (US) loss of property in the Kobe area, Japan. This unexpected disaster underlined the idea that industrial facilities should pay special consideration to damages including ground failure due to the liquefaction. Strong ground motions caused serious damage to urban structures in the area. Thus, the Seismic Design Code of the High Pressure Gas Facilities were improved to include two-step design assessments, that is, for Level 1 earthquakes (operating basis earthquake: a probable strong earthquake during the service life of the facilities), and Level 2 earthquakes (safety shutdown earthquake: a possible strongest earthquake with extremely low probability of occurrence). For Level 2 earthquakes, ground failure by possible liquefaction will be taken into account. For a Level 1 earthquake, the required seismic performance is that the system must remain safe without critical damage after the earthquake, including no gas leakage. For a Level 2 earthquake, the required seismic performance is that the system must remain safe without gas leakage. This means a certain non-elastic deformation without gas leakage may be allowed. The High Pressure Gas Safety Institute of Japan set up the Seismic Safety Promotion Committee to modify their code, in advance of other industries, and has continued to investigate more effective seismic design practices for more than 5 years. The final version of the guidelines has established design practices for the both Level 1 and Level 2 earthquakes. In this paper, the activities of the committee, their new design concepts and scope of applications are explained.

1.
Akiyama, H., 1998, “Advanced Approach for Seismic Design of High Pressure Gas Facilities in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan: Part 2. Basic Concept of Ultimate Strength Design Method,” Proceeding of ASME/JSME PVP Conference.
2.
Ishida, K., Akiyama, H., Endo, S., and Ochi, Y., 1998, “Advanced Approach for Seismic Design of High Pressure Gas Facilities in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan: Part 3. Application of Ultimate Strength Design Method to Storage Tanks,” Proceeding of ASME/JSME PVP Conference.
3.
Inaba, M., Akiyama, H., Ikeda, M., and Ochi, Y., 1998, “Advanced Approach for Seismic Design of High Pressure Gas Facilities in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan: Part 4. Application of Ultimate Strength Design Method to Towers,” Proceeding of ASME/JSME PVP Conference.
4.
KHK
,
1984
, “
Report On Shaking Table Test of Steel Cylindrical Storage Tank: No. 1 to 3 Report
,”
Journal of High Pressure Gas
,
21
(
8
), pp.
440
452
(in Japanese).
5.
KHK
,
1982
, “
Vibration Test Report of Steel Tower
,”
Journal of High Pressure Gas
,
19
(
10
), pp.
497
518
(in Japanese).
6.
JLPA
,
1973
, “
Vibration Test Report of Large Scaled LPG Spherical Storage Tank
,”
Journal of JLPA
,
10
(
10
), pp.
17
64
(in Japanese).
7.
Mukaimachi, N., Ando, F., and Ikeda, M., 2002, “An Advanced Computational Method for Nonlinear Behavior of Piping Systems subject to Earthquake,” Proceeding of ASME/JSME PVP Conference.
8.
Ando, F., Sawa, T., and Ikeda, M., 2002, “A New Design Method for Leakage and Damage for Piping Components Subjected to High Level Earthquake,” Proceeding of ASME/JSME PVP Conference.
9.
Inaba, M., Ikeda, M., Shimizu, N., and Tetsuya, W., “A New Seismic Criteria of Piping Systems in High Pressure Gas Facilities,” Proceeding of ASME/JSME PVP Conference.
10.
Yasuda, S., and Berrill, J. B., 2000, “Observation of the Earthquake Response of Foundations in Soil Profiles Containing Saturated Sands,” An International Conference On Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, Nov. 2000, Melbourne, Australia.
11.
KHK, 1998, “Guideline for the Seismic Design of the High Pressure Gas Facilities—Evaluation of Level 1 Required Seismic Performance,” KHK E 012-1-1998, (in Japanese).
12.
KHK, 2000, “Guideline for the Seismic Design of the High Pressure Gas Facilities—Evaluation of Level 2 Required Seismic Performance,” KHK E 012-3-2000, (in Japanese).
You do not currently have access to this content.