The reactor pressure vessel is usually clad with stainless steel to prevent corrosion and radiation embrittlement, and thus, the population of subclad cracks is higher than that of surface cracks. In fact, a number of subclad cracks have been found during in-service-inspections. These subclad cracks should be assumed for a safe operation under normal conditions and faulted conditions such as pressurized thermal shock (PTS). There are several elastic stress intensity factor (SIF) solutions for subclad cracks which are used for ASME fracture assessment procedures. However, these solutions are known to be overly conservative due to intrinsic assumptions. In this paper, full 3-D elastic-plastic finite element analyses were performed to investigate the validity of the present ASME code in evaluating the integrity of vessel under PTS conditions. The solution in ASME Section XI code gives accurate SIF values when the crack tip is close to cladding. However, the difference between the code solution and elastic plastic finite element analysis (EPFEA) results become significant with increasing crack depth. This difference is caused by the stress discontinuity at the interface between cladding and parent material. Elastic finite element analysis (EFEA) results, which do not consider plastic deformation at the clad material, also showed a big difference compared to those from EPFEA. Therefore, it is recommended to perform EPFEA for the accurate assessment of subclad cracks under PTS which causes plastic deformation at the cladding.

1.
Jhung
,
M. J.
,
Park
,
Y. W.
, and
Lee
,
J. B.
,
1997
, “
Integrity Evaluation of Kori 1 Reactor Vessel for Rancho Seco Transient
,”
Trans. KSME
,
21
, No.
7
, pp.
1089
1096
.
2.
Kwak
,
D. O.
,
Choi
,
J. B.
,
Kim
,
Y. J.
,
Pyo
,
C. R.
, and
Park
,
Y. W.
,
1999
, “
Deterministic Fracture Analysis of Nuclear Reactor Vessel for Pressurized Thermal Shock Accident
,”
Trans. KSME
,
23
, No.
8
, pp.
1425
1434
.
3.
Mukhopadhyay
,
N. K.
,
Kumar
,
T. V. Pavan
,
Chattopadhyay
,
J.
,
Dutta
,
B. K.
,
Kushwaha
,
H. S.
, and
Raj
,
V. V.
,
1998
, “
Deterministic Assessment of Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity under Pressurized Thermal Shock
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
75
, pp.
1055
1064
.
4.
Keim, E., Hertlein, R., Fricke, S., Scho¨pper, A., Ternon-Morin, F., and Bezdikian, G., 1999, “Thermal Hydraulics and Fracture Mechanics Analysis of a Small Break Loss of Coolant Accident in the French CP0-Type Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity Assessment,” Proc., ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, 388, pp. 71–77.
5.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, 1995, Rules for In-Service Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components.
6.
Bass, B. R., 1996, CSNI Project for Fracture Analysis of Large scale International Reference Experiments (FALSIRE II), USNRC Report NUREG/CR-6460.
7.
Hurst
,
R.
,
McGarry
,
D.
,
Taylor
,
N.
, and
Wintle
,
J.
,
1999
, “
Evaluation of the NESC I Project
,”
Proc. SMiRT 15
,
3
, pp.
333
340
.
8.
Dickson, T. L., Bass, B. R., and Williams, P. T., 2000, “Validation of a Linear-Elastic Facture Methodology for Postulated Flaws Embedded in the Wall of a Nuclear Reactor Pressure Vessel,” Proc. ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, 403, pp. 145–151.
9.
Choi
,
S. N.
,
Jang
,
K. S.
,
Kim
,
J. S.
,
Choi
,
J. B.
, and
Kim
,
Y. J.
,
2000
, “
Effect of Cladding on the Stress Intensity Factors in the Reactor Pressure Vessel
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
199
, pp.
101
110
.
10.
Lee, S. M., Choi, J. B., Kim, Y. J., Park, Y. W., Jhung, M. J., and Pyo, C. R., 2000, “Elastic-Plastic Finite Element Analyses for the Integrity Evaluation of Nuclear Reactor Vessel under Pressurized Thermal Shock Transients,” Proc. ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, 403, pp. 79–85.
11.
USNRC, 1998, Radiation Embrittlement of Reactor Vessel Materials, Regulatory Guide 1.99 Rev. 2.
12.
ABAQUS Version 5.8, 1999, Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorensen, Inc.
13.
Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, 2000, Round Robin Analysis of Pressurized Thermal Shock for Reactor Pressure Vessel, KINS/AR-696.
14.
Moran
,
B.
, and
Shih
,
C. F.
,
1987
, “
A General Treatment of Crack Tip Contour Integrals
,”
Int. J. Fract.
,
35
, pp.
295
310
.
You do not currently have access to this content.