The bottom plate of aboveground oil storage tanks can bulge, separating from the foundation due to welding deformation. When such a bulge is subjected to liquid pressure, it deforms continuously to make contact with the foundation from the edge, and the remaining area of the bulge decreases with increasing liquid pressure. As a result, the deformation is extremely localized and plastic strain occurs at the bulge. This paper presents a plane strain finite element analysis for the evaluation of localized bottom bulges in aboveground oil storage tanks. Load-incremental, elastic-plastic large deformation analysis is carried out considering the bottom plate contact with the foundation. The relationship of the plastic strain at the bulged bottom plate to the liquid pressure is discussed together with the deformation of the bulge. As a result, the bottom plate thickness has a significant effect on the deformation, but the bulged height does not. After the bulged center makes contact with the foundation, the stress and strain do not increase with increasing liquid pressure. In addition, the permissible bulged profile specified by API Standard 653 elastically deforms to make contact with the foundation under low liquid pressure.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
load distribution, pressure vessels, pressure control, deformation, welding, liquids, oil technology
Topics:
Deformation, Pressure, Storage tanks, Stress, Welding, American Petroleum Institute, Displacement
1.
American Petroleum Institute, 1995, “API Standard 653, Tank Inspection, Repair, Alternation and Reconstruction, Second Edition.”
2.
Marr, W. A., Ramos, J. A., and Lambe, T. W., 1982, “Criteria for Settlement of Tanks,” ASCE Geotech. Eng. Div., pp. 1017–1039.
3.
Kanai
,
R.
,
1992
, “
Behavior of the Detached Bottom Plate on Rigid Foundation under Liquid Pressure, 1st Report” (in Japanese
),
J. Soc. Naval Architects of Jpn
,
172
, pp.
477
–
486
.
4.
Kanai
,
R.
,
1993
, “
Behavior of the Detached Bottom Plate on Rigid Foundation under Liquid Pressure, 2nd Report” (in Japanese
),
J. Soc. Naval Arch. Jpn
,
173
, pp.
303
–
313
.
5.
Timoshenko, S., and Woinowsky-Krieger, 1959, Theory of Plates and Shells, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, pp. 408–412.
6.
Andreani, J. L., Osage, D. A., Parikh, P. D., and Horwege, J. A., 1995, “An Evaluation of Procedures for Determining the Fitness-for Service of Settled Aboveground Storage Tanks,” Proc. ASME PVP-Vol. 315, pp. 45–66.
7.
Zienkiewicz, O. C., and Taylor, R. L., 1991, The Finite Element Method, Fourth Edition, Vol. 2, McGraw-Hill, London, UK, pp. 211–283.
8.
Bathe
,
K. J.
,
Ramm
,
E.
, and
Wilson
,
E. L.
,
1975
, “
Finite Element Formulations for Large Deformation Dynamic Analysis
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
,
9
, pp.
353
–
396
.
9.
Schreyer
,
H. L.
,
Kulak
,
R. F.
, and
Kramer
,
J. M.
,
1979
, “
Accurate Numerical Solutions for Elastic-Plastic Models
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
101
, pp.
226
–
234
.
10.
American Petroleum Institute, 2000, “API Recommended Practice 579, Fitness-for-Service, B.3.4.1.”
Copyright © 2002
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.