Results of through-thickness residual stress measurements are provided for a variety of samples of weld-deposited 308/309L stainless steel and Alloy 600 cladding on low-alloy pressure vessel ferritic steels. Clad thicknesses between 5 and 9 mm on samples that vary in thickness from 45 to 200 mm were studied. The samples were taken from flat plates, from a spherical head of a pressure vessel, from a ring-segment of a nozzle bore, and from the transition radius between a nozzle and a pressure vessel shell. A layer removal method was used to measure the residual stresses. The effects of uncertainties in elastic constants (Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio) as well as experimental error are assessed. All measurements were done at room temperature. The results of this work indicate that curvature plays a significant role in cladding residual stress and that tensile residual stresses as high as the yield stress can be measured in the cladding material. Since the vessel from which the spherical and nozzle corner samples were taken was hydrotested, and the flat plate specimens were taken from specimens used in mechanical fatigue testing, these results suggest that rather high tensile residual stresses can be retained in the cladding material, even after some mechanical loading associated with hydrotesting.

1.
Ferrill, D. A., Juhl, P. B., and Miller, D. R., 1966, “Measurement of Residual Stresses in a Heavy Weldment,” Welding Research Supplement, Nov., pp. 504s–514s.
2.
Friedman
E.
,
1975
, “
Thermomechanical Analysis of the Welding Process Using the Finite Element Method
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY
, Vol.
97
, pp.
206
213
.
3.
Nickell, R., and Hibbit, H., 1975, “Thermal and Mechanical Analysis of Welded Structures,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, No. 32, pp. 110–120.
4.
Rybicki
E. F.
,
Schmueser
D. W.
,
Stonesifer
R. B.
,
Groom
J. J.
, and
Mishler
H. W.
,
1978
, “
A Finite Element Model for Residual Stresses and Deflections in Girth-Butt Welded Pipes
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY
, Vol.
100
, Aug., pp.
256
262
.
5.
Cheng, W. L., and Punch, E. F., 1997, “Analysis of Fatigue Crack Growth in a Residual Stress Field using Alternating Finite Element Method,” ASME PVP-Vol. 354, Current Topics in the Design and Analysis of Pressure Vessels and Piping.
6.
Bernard
J. L.
,
Vagner
J.
,
Pellissier-Tanon
A.
, and
Faure
F.
,
1992
, “
Effect of Residual Stresses and Complex Loadings on the Fatigue Behavior of Underclad Cracks
,”
Nuclear Engineering Design
, Vol.
133
, pp.
129
138
.
7.
Ternon, F., and Faidy, C., 1997, “Residual Stresses and Stress Corrosion Cracking of PWR CRDM Nozzles,” Approximate Methods in the Design and Analysis of Pressure Vessels and Piping Components, ASME PVP-Vol. 347, ed. W. J. Bees, pp. 193–200.
8.
Shealy
W. S.
,
Shadley
J. R.
, and
Rybicki
E. F.
,
1984
, “
An Improved Back-Computation Procedure for the Parting-Out Step of a Destructive Method for Measuring Residual Stresses in Pipes
,”
Strain
, Vol.
20
, Aug., pp.
117
122
.
9.
Shadley
J. R.
, and
Rybicki
E. F.
,
1987
, “
Application Guidelines for the Parting-Out Step in a Through-Thickness Residual Stress Measurement Procedure
,”
Strain
, Vol.
23
, Nov., pp.
157
166
.
10.
Rybicki, E. F., Shadley, J. R., and Shealy, W. S., 1983, “A Consistent Splitting Model for Experimental Residual Stress Analysis,” Experimental Mechanics, Dec., pp. 438–446.
11.
Shadley
J. R.
, and
Rybicki
E. F.
,
1985
, “
Experimental Evaluation of Through-Thickness Stresses in a Welded Pipe Using the Consistent Splitting Model
,”
Experimental Mechanics
, Vol.
25
, No.
2
, June, pp.
115
122
.
12.
SAE Information Report, 1965, “Methods of Residual Stress Measurement,” SAE J936 Handbook Supplement, Dec.
13.
Rybicki
E. F.
,
Shadley
J. R.
,
Sandhu
A. S.
, and
Stonesifer
R. B.
,
1986
, “
Experimental and Computational Residual Stress Evaluation of a Weld Clad Plate and Machined Test Specimens
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
, Vol.
110
, Oct., pp.
297
304
.
14.
Greving
D. J.
,
Rybicki
E. F.
, and
Shadley
J. R.
,
1994
, “
Residual Stress Evaluations of Thermal Spray Coatings by a Modified Layer Removal Method
,”
The Journal of Thermal Spray Technology
, Vol.
3
, No.
4
, Dec., pp.
379
388
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.