This paper summarizes the results of a comprehensive experimental study to quantify the effects of strain rate on concrete compressive and tensile strengths. Direct compression and splitting tensile tests were conducted at quasi-static rates (between 10−7/s and 10−5/s) in a standard MTS machine to establish the “static” properties. These same tests were conducted at high strain rates (between 10−1/s and 103/s) on a split-Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) to determine the dynamic material properties. A statistical analysis was performed on the data and strain-rate-dependent constitutive equations, both for compression and tension, were developed. These constitutive equations were subsequently employed to modify an existing quasi-static, nonlinear concrete material model.

1.
ADINA, 1991, System Theory and Modeling Guide, Report ARD 90-8, ADINA R&D, Watertown, MA.
2.
ADINA, 1990, A Finite Element Computer Program for Automatic Dynamic Incremental Nonlinear Analysis, Report ARD 90-1, ADINA R&D, Inc., Watertown, MA.
3.
ASTM, 1986, Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, ASTM C496-86, American Society for Testing Materials, Annual Book of Standards, pp. 256–259.
4.
Bathe
K. J.
, and
Ramaswamy
S.
,
1979
, “
On Three Dimensional Nonlinear Analysis of Concrete Structures
,”
Nuclear Engineering and Design
, Vol.
52
, pp.
385
409
.
5.
Dilorio, F., 1991, SAS Applications Programming, PWS-KENT Publishing Co., Boston, MA.
6.
Felice, C. W., and Gaffney, E. S., 1987, “Early Time Response of Soil in a Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar Experiment,” Proceedings, Third Symposium on the Interaction of Non-nuclear Munitions with Structures, Mannheim, West Germany, March 9–13, Vol. II, pp. 508–524.
7.
Felice, C. W., Brown, J. A., Gaffney, E. S., and Olsen, J. M., 1985, “An Investigation into the High Strain-Rate Behavior of Compacted Sand using the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Technique,” Proceedings, Second Symposium on the Interaction of Non-nuclear Munitions with Structures, Panama City Beach, FL, April 15–18, pp. 391–396.
8.
Department of the Army, 1984, Fundamentals of Protective Design for Conventional Weapons, Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS.
9.
Gaffney, E. S., Brown, J. A., and Felice, C. W., 1985, “Soils as Samples for the Split Hopkinson Bar,” Proceedings, Second Symposium on the Interaction of Non-nuclear Munitions with Structures, Panama City Beach, FL, April 15–18, pp. 397–402.
10.
Hughes
M. L.
,
Tedesco
J. W.
, and
Ross
C. A.
,
1993
, “
Numerical Analysis of High Strain Rate Splitting-Tensile Tests
,”
Computer and Structures
, Vol.
47
, No.
405
, pp.
653
671
.
11.
Kupfer
J.
,
Hilsdorf
H. K.
, and
Ru¨sch
,
1964
, “
Behavior of Concrete Under Biaxial Stresses
,”
ACI Journal
, Vol.
66
, No.
8
, pp.
656
666
.
12.
Malvern, L. E., and Ross, C. A., 1986, Dynamic Response of Concrete and Concrete Structures, Third Annual Technical Report, AFOSR, Contract F49620-83-K007.
13.
Malvern, L. E., Jenkins, D. A., Tianxi, T., and Ross, C. A., 1985, “Dynamic Compressive Testing of Concrete,” Proceedings, Second Symposium on the Interaction of Non-nuclear Munitions with Structures, Panama City Beach, FL, April 15–18, pp. 194–199.
14.
Malvern, L. E., and Ross, C. A., 1985, Dynamic Response of Concrete and Concrete Structures, Second Annual Technical Report, AFOSR, Contract F49620-83-K007.
15.
Malvern, L. E., and Ross, C. A., 1984, Dynamic Response of Concrete and Concrete Structures, First Annual Technical Report, AFOSR, Contract F49620-83-K007.
16.
Neville, A. M., 1981, Properties of Concrete, Pitman, London, U.K., pp. 549–552.
17.
Nicholus, T., 1987, “Materials Behavior at High Strain Rates,” Impact Dynamics, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
18.
Raphael
J. M.
,
1984
, “
Tensile Strength of Concrete
,”
ACI Journal
, Vol.
81
, No.
2
, pp.
158
165
.
19.
Ross
C. A.
,
Tedesco
J. W.
, and
Kuennen
S. T.
,
1995
, “
Effects of Strain Rate on Concrete Strength
,”
ACI Materials Journal
, Vol.
92
, No.
1
, pp.
37
47
.
20.
Ross, C. A., 1989, Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar Tests, Report ESL-TR-88-82, Air Force Engineering and Services Center, Tyndall AFB, FL.
21.
Ross, C. A., Thompson, P. Y., and Nash, P. T., 1987, “Dynamic Testing of Soils Using a Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar,” Proceedings, Third Symposium on the Interaction of Non-nuclear Munitions with Structures, Mannheim, West Germany, March 9–13, Vol. II, pp. 525–537.
22.
Ross, C. A., Nash, P. T., and Friesenhahn, G. J., 1986, Pressure Waves in Soils using a Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar, Report ESL-TR-86-29, Air Force Engineering and Services Center, Tyndall AFB, FL.
23.
Soroushian, P., Choi, K., and Kowalczak, R., 1984, “Ductility of Plain and Confined Concrete Under Different Strain Rates,” ACI Journal, Jan.-Feb., pp. 73–81.
24.
Tedesco
J. W.
,
Hughes
M. L.
, and
Ross
C. A.
,
1994
, “
Numerical Simulation of High Strain Rate Concrete Compression Tests
,”
Computers and Structures
, Vol.
51
, No.
1
, pp.
65
77
.
25.
Tedesco
J. W.
,
Ross
C. A.
, and
Kuennen
S. T.
,
1993
, “
Experimental and Numerical Analysis of High Strain Rate Splitting Tensile Tests
,”
ACI Materials Journal
, Vol.
90
, No.
2
, pp.
167
169
.
26.
Tedesco
J. W.
,
Ross
C. A.
,
McGill
P. B.
, and
O’Neal
B. P.
,
1991
, “
Numerical Analysis of High-Strain Rate Concrete Direct Tension Tests
,”
Computers and Structures
, Vol.
40
, No.
2
, pp.
313
327
.
27.
Tedesco
J. W.
,
Ross
C. A.
, and
Grunair
R. M.
,
1989
, “
Numerical Analysis of Dynamic Split Cylinder Test
,”
Computers and Structures
, Vol.
34
, No.
3
, pp.
609
624
.
28.
Winter, G., and Nilson, A. H., 1979, Design of Concrete Structures, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, pp. 15–21.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.