Abstract

Two methods of substructuring finite element models are examined. Each method uses normal mode theory as the basis for selecting the appropriate modes for the substructure and the properties of the modes. One of the substructuring procedures uses component mode synthesis to attach the substructure to the residual structure, while the other method uses direct connection. The resulting combined models are evaluated for shock input using NASTRAN, and the results are compared to the analysis of the original model in each case.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Finite element analysis, Finite element model, Shock (Mechanics)
1.
Benfield
W. A.
, and
Hruda
R. F.
, “
Vibration Analysis of Structures by Component Mode Synthesis
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
9
, No.
7
, July, pp.
1255
–
1261
.
2.
Blake, R. E., and O’Hara, G. J., 1956, “Dynamic Response in Three Dimensions of Linear Elastic Structures to Independent Motions of Multiple Supports,” NRL Report 4739, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C., May 15.
3.
Bogert, P. B., McPheeters, B. W., and Milam, C. P., 1989, “Finite Element Model Size Reduction for Machinery Shock and Vibration Problems Using Component Mode Synthesis Techniques,” The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers; Spring Meeting/STAR Symposium, New Orleans, LA; April 12–15.
4.
Bort, R. L., 1986, “Masses of Normal Modes for Structures with Multiple Supports,” NRL Memorandum Report 5877, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, November 14.
5.
Craig
R. R.
, and
Bampton
M. C. C.
,
1968
, “
Coupling of Substructures for Dynamic Analysis
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
6
, No.
7
, July, pp.
1313
–
1318
.
6.
Fourney, W. L., and O’Hara, G. J., 1968, “Normal Mode Theory for Combined Structures,” NRL Report 6776, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, October 24.
7.
Hirt, E. F., Pusey, H. C., and Scavuzzo, R. J., 1991, Lecture and Training Series Notes For Naval Shock Design, NKF Engineering Associates, Inc.; Vienna, VA.
8.
MacNeal
R. H.
,
1971
, “
A Hybrid Method of Component Mode Synthesis
,”
Computers & Structures
, Vol.
1
, pp.
581
–
601
.
9.
McPheeters, B. W., Lev, A., Bogert, P. B., and Scavuzzo, R. J., 1987, “Dynamic Substructuring for Shock Spectrum Analysis using Component Mode Synthesis,” Shock & Vibration Symposium, Vol. II.
10.
NASTRAN, 1994, User’s Manual, Computer Software Management and Information Center (COSMIC), Athens, GA.
11.
O’Hara, G. J., and Cunniff, P. F., 1963, “Elements of Normal Mode Theory,” NRL Report 6002, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, November 15.
12.
Scavuzzo, R. J., Raftopoulos, D. D., and Bailey, J. L., 1973, “Application of Three-Dimensional Normal Mode Theory to Seismic Analysis of Nuclear Power Plants,” 2nd International Conference on Structural Materials in Reactor Technology, Vol. IV, Part J-K; Berlin, Germany, September 10–14.
13.
Sebert, K. A., 1984, “A Mathematical Model of the Transient Motion Response of the US Navy Floating Shock Platform,” Master’s thesis, University of Akron, Akron, OH.
14.
Sebert, K. A., 1993, “Finite Element Model Reduction With and Without Component Mode Synthesis by Substructuring Using Normal Mode Theory,” P.D dissertation, University of Akron, Akron, OH.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1995
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.