Abstract

The expectation of rapid growth in floating offshore wind farms (FOWFs) calls for urgent development of the associated supply chain comprising floater fabrication, transportation, assembly, and installation. As the intermediate stock of floaters is limited, irregular and unplanned suspension of operations that could arise due to unfavorable weather conditions would strongly influence the supply chain. Successful throughput in the supply chain results from available infrastructure that defines the stock and flow capacity for each step in the project. The complexity of the interactions among the processes and the uncertainty of weather conditions pose significant challenges in planning an efficient infrastructure development plan to meet the future demand for FOWFs. This study proposes a planning method that evaluates the performance of various configurations in such development using a stock–flow simulation model while considering weather conditions. By using this dynamic model, challenges in the supply chain arising from limited stock or unfavorable weather conditions can be replicated, and the infrastructure development plans necessary to meet project requirements can be suggested. The model is validated by using data from an existing FOWF project and applied to a case study in Kyushu, Japan to propose port infrastructure development plans to achieve the desired performance. From the case study, setting the operational limit for weather conditions was identified as the primary bottleneck by quantifying operation rates and downtime for each infrastructure. Improvement solutions for the identified bottlenecks significantly alleviate demands on other infrastructure and decrease the impact of weather uncertainty.

References

1.
International Renewable Energy Agency
,
2019
, Future of Wind.
2.
DNV
,
2022
, Floating Offshore Wind: The Next Five Years.
3.
HM Government
,
2023
, Offshore Wind Net Zero Investment Roadmap.
4.
Lee
,
J.
, and
Xydis
,
G.
,
2023
, “
Floating Offshore Wind Projects Development in South Korea Without Government Subsidies
,”
Clean Technol. Environ. Pol.
,
26
(
5
), pp.
1587
1602
.
5.
Laura
,
C.-S.
, and
Vicente
,
D.-C.
,
2014
, “
Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Farms
,”
Renewable Energy
,
66
, pp.
41
48
.
6.
Poulsen
,
T.
, and
Lema
,
R.
,
2017
, “
Is the Supply Chain Ready for the Green Transformation? The Case of Offshore Wind Logistics
,”
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
,
73
, pp.
758
771
.
7.
Tjaberings
,
J.
,
Fazi
,
S.
, and
Ursavas
,
E.
,
2022
, “
Evaluating Operational Strategies for the Installation of Offshore Wind Turbine Substructures
,”
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
,
170
, p.
112951
.
8.
Barter
,
G. E.
,
Robertson
,
A.
, and
Musial
,
W.
,
2020
, “
A Systems Engineering Vision for Floating Offshore Wind Cost Optimization
,”
Renewable Energy Focus
,
34
, pp.
1
16
.
9.
Jiang
,
Z.
,
2021
, “
Installation of Offshore Wind Turbines: A Technical Review
,”
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
,
139
, p.
110576
.
10.
Torres
,
E. S.
,
Thies
,
P. R.
, and
Lawless
,
M.
,
2023
, “
Offshore Logistics: Scenario Planning and Installation Modeling of Floating Offshore Wind Projects
,”
ASME Open J. Eng.
, 2, p.
021013
.
11.
Castro-Santos
,
L.
,
Filgueira-Vizoso
,
A.
,
Lamas-Galdo
,
I.
, and
Carral-Couce
,
L.
,
2018
, “
Methodology to Calculate the Installation Costs of Offshore Wind Farms Located in Deep Waters
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
170
, pp.
1124
1135
.
12.
Chitteth Ramachandran
,
R.
,
Desmond
,
C.
,
Judge
,
F.
,
Serraris
,
J.-J.
, and
Murphy
,
J.
,
2022
, “
Floating Wind Turbines: Marine Operations Challenges and Opportunities
,”
Wind Energy Sci.
,
7
(
2
), pp.
903
924
.
13.
Hasumi
,
T.
,
Yokoi
,
T.
,
Haneda
,
K.
,
Chujo
,
T.
, and
Fujiwara
,
T.
,
2023
, “
Research on Offshore Installation Time Estimation Model for Floating Offshore Wind Farms
,”
J. Jpn Soc. Nav. Architects Ocean Eng.
,
38
, pp.
127
139
.
14.
Crowle
,
A.
, and
Thies
,
P.
,
2022
, “
Floating Offshore Wind Turbines Port Requirements for Construction
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part M: J. Eng. Maritime Environ.
,
236
(
4
), pp.
1047
1056
.
15.
Crown Estate Scotland
,
2020
, Ports for Offshore Wind a Review of the Net-Zero Opportunity for Ports in Scotland.
16.
Matha
,
D.
,
Brons-Illig
,
C.
,
Mitzlaff
,
A.
, and
Scheffler
,
R.
,
2017
, “
Fabrication and Installation Constraints for Floating Wind and Implications on Current Infrastructure and Design
,”
Energy Proc.
,
137
, pp.
299
306
.
17.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism
,
2021
, Optimal Scale of Base Ports for Floating Offshore Wind Farm (in Japanese).
18.
19.
Fukushima Offshore Wind Consortium
,
2019
, Instruction Manual for Introduction of Floating Offshore Wind Farm (in Japanese).
20.
Jankowski
,
D.
,
Lamm
,
A.
, and
Hahn
,
A.
,
2021
, “
Determination of AIS Position Accuracy and Evaluation of Reconstruction Methods for Maritime Observation Data
,”
IFAC-PapersOnLine
,
54
(
16
), pp.
97
104
.
22.
Japan Meteorological Agency Data Original Data Numerical forecast GPV, http:// database.rish.kyoto-u.ac.jp/arch/jmadata/gpv-original.html
23.
Kincardine Offshore Windfarm Project Windfarm Development, https://pilotrenewables.com/
24.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism
,
2022
, Study on the Configuration and Scale of Base Ports for Achieving Carbon Neutrality by 2050 (in Japanese).
25.
City of Kitakyushu Seaport and Airport Bureau Green Energy Port Project Office
,
2020
, Offshore Wind Power Base Port Development Project (in Japanese).
26.
Port of Long Beach
,
2023
, Pier Wind Project Concept Phase Final Conceptual Report.
27.
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority
,
2019
, 2018 Ports Assessment: Port Ivory Pre-Front End Engineering Design Report.
28.
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority
,
2019
, 2018 Ports Assessment: Port of Albany-Rensselaer Pre-Front End Engineering Design Report.
29.
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority
,
2019
, 2018 Ports Assessment: Port of Coeymans Pre-Front End Engineering Design Report.
30.
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority
,
2019
, 2018 Ports Assessment: South Brooklyn Marine Terminal Pre-Front End Engineering Design Report.
31.
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority
,
2017
, New York State Offshore Wind Master Plan Assessment of Ports and Infrastructure.
32.
Massachusetts Clean Energy Center
,
2022
, Massachusetts Offshore Wind Ports and Infrastructure Assessment: North Shore.
33.
Humbolt Bay Harbor
,
2023
, Humboldt Bay Offshore Wind MVP (Minimum Viable Port) Project Description.
You do not currently have access to this content.