Graphical Abstract Figure
Graphical Abstract Figure
Close modal

Abstract

High-speed craft typically utilizes hydroplane boat-type and large power engine to obtain high-speed in water. However, these designs result in significant hydrodynamic nonlinearities, including slamming, wetness, sliding, and dolphin effect. As a result, high-speed craft exhibits complex impact load characteristics and structural responses, which have garnered considerable attention from ship mechanics researchers. This paper studies impacting load and structural response of a high-speed craft by means of numerical approach that combines computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and finite element method (FEM). A model experiment of high-speed craft is selected to simulate impact load and structural response. The craft model consists of two ship bodies and a keel beam, and a number of pressure sensors and strain gaugesare arranged to capture the impacting pressure and vertical bending moment (VBM). A numerical fluid-structure interaction (FSI) approach is employed to investigate the model experiment of the high-speed craft by coupling CFD and FEM. CFD is utilized to solve the hydrodynamics of the high-speed craft. Dynamics of fluid-body interaction (DFBI) and overset grid algorithm are employed to accurately simulate the motion of the craft. Dynamic FEM is used to calculate structural response of high-speed craft, structural VBM is obtained. Two-way FSI is employed to realize coupling of CFD and FEM. This involves iterating the wave pressures and structural displacement to make progress. Ultimately, the numerical results and experimental results, which encompass impacting pressure, craft motion, and VBM, are compared and analyzed, demonstrating a high degree of agreement. Numerical methods can be employed to analyze the impacting load and structural response for high-speed craft.

References

1.
Yu-Min
,
2012
, “
Israel’s New Generation High Speed Gunboat
,”
J. Ship Knowl.
,
10
, pp.
50
53
.
2.
Li-Wei
,
L.-T.
,
2020
, “
Military Application and Intelligent Upgrade of Unmanned Boat Technology in Various Countries
,”
J. Feihang Missile
,
10
, pp.
60
62
.
3.
Hu-Yang
,
2009
, “
UK XSR High-Speed Interceptor With a Speed of 85 Knots
,”
J. Ship Knowl.
,
12
, p.
23
.
4.
Liu
,
D.
,
Li
,
F.
, and
Liang
,
X.
,
2022
, “
Numerical Study on Green Water and Slamming Loads of Ship Advancing in Freaking Wave
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
261
, p.
111768
.
5.
Gerritsma
,
J.
,
Keuning
,
J. A.
, and
Versluis
,
A.
,
1993
, “
Sailing Yacht Performance in Calm Water and in Waves
,”
SNAME 11th Chesapeake Sailing Yacht Symposium
,
Annapolis, MD
,
Jan. 28–30
,
OnePetro
.
6.
Kim
,
J.-N.
,
Jeong
,
U.-C.
,
Park
,
J.-W.
, and
Kim
,
D.-J.
,
2006
, “
A Study on the Initial Hull Form Development and Resistance Performance of a 45 Knots Class High-Speed Craft
,”
J. Ocean Eng. Technol.
,
20
(
1
), pp.
32
36
.
7.
Lee
,
K.-J.
,
Park
,
N.-R.
, and
Lee
,
E.-J.
,
2005
, “
An Experimental Study on the Improvement of Resistance Performance by Appendage for 50 Knots Class Planing Hull Form
,”
J. Korean Soc. Fisher. Ocean Technol.
,
41
(
3
), pp.
222
226
.
8.
Kim
,
D.-J.
,
Rhee
,
K.-P.
, and
Park
,
H.-S.
,
2009
, “
A Study on the Effects of Weight and Center of Gravity of a Planing Craft on Running Attitude
,”
J. Soc. Naval Architects Korea
,
46
(
3
), pp.
335
342
.
9.
Wagner
,
H.
,
1932
, “
Ü’ber Stoß-und Gleitvorgänge an Der Oberfläche Von Flüssigkeiten
,”
ZAMM-J. Appl. Math. Mech.
,
12
(
4
), pp.
193
215
.
10.
Zarnick
,
E. E.
,
1978
, “A Nonlinear Mathematical Model of Motions of a Planing Boat in Regular Waves,” David W Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center, Bethesda, MD.
11.
Sun
,
H.
, and
Faltinsen
,
O. M.
,
2011
, “
Dynamic Motions of Planing Vessels in Head Seas
,”
J. Marine Sci. Technol.
,
16
, pp.
168
180
.
12.
Dashtimanesh
,
A.
,
Enshaei
,
H.
, and
Tavakoli
,
S.
,
2019
, “
Oblique-Asymmetric 2D + T Model to Compute Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments in Coupled Sway, Roll, and Yaw Motions of Planing Hulls
,”
J. Ship Res.
,
63
(
1
), pp.
1
15
.
13.
Su
,
Y.
,
Chen
,
Q.
,
Shen
,
H.
, and
Lu
,
W.
,
2012
, “
Numerical Simulation of a Planing Vessel at High Speed
,”
J. Marine Sci. Appl.
,
11
(
2
), pp.
178
183
.
14.
Judge
,
C.
,
Mousaviraad
,
M.
,
Stern
,
F.
,
Lee
,
E.
,
Fullerton
,
A.
,
Geiser
,
J.
,
Schleicher
,
C.
, et al.,
2020
, “
Experiments and CFD of a High-Speed Deep-V Planing Hull-Part II: Slamming in Waves
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
,
97
, p.
102059
.
15.
Ojeda
,
R.
,
Prusty
,
B. G.
, and
Salas
,
M.
,
2004
, “
Finite Element Investigation on the Static Response of a Composite Catamaran Under Slamming Loads
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
31
(
7
), pp.
901
929
.
16.
Den Besten
,
H.
, and
Huijsmans
,
R.
,
2009
, “
Hydrodynamic Impact of Sandwich Structures With Flexible Core and Structural Damping Properties
,” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Hydroelasticity in Marine Technology,
Delft University of Technology, Ship Hydromechanis and Structures Laboratory, Report 1644-P
.
17.
Qin
,
Z.
, and
Batra
,
R.
,
2009
, “
Local Slamming Impact of Sandwich Composite Hulls
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
46
(
10
), pp.
2011
2035
.
18.
Wang
,
S.
,
Su
,
Y.
,
Zhang
,
X.
, and
Yang
,
J.
,
2012
, “
RANSE Simulation of High-Speed Planning Craft in Regular Waves
,”
J. Marine Sci. Appl.
,
11
(
4
), pp.
447
452
.
19.
Piro
,
D. J.
, and
Maki
,
K. J.
,
2013
, “
Hydroelastic Analysis of Bodies that Enter and Exit Water
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
,
37
, pp.
134
150
.
20.
Camilleri
,
J.
,
2017
, “
Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Slamming Loads on High-Speed Craft Including Hydroelastic Effects
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
21.
Hu
,
Y.-C.
,
Liu
,
W.-Q.
,
Cao
,
J.-W.
, and
Xu
,
S.-X.
,
2022
, “Numerical Investigation of Impacting Loads for a Model Test of High-Speed Craft in Waves.”
22.
Liu
,
W.-Q.
,
Hu
,
Y.-C.
,
Cao
,
J.-W.
,
Xu
,
S.-X.
, and
Wu
,
Y.-G.
,
2022
, “
Model Experimental Study on Slamming Load of High-Speed Craft Under Waves
,”
J. Ship Mech.
23.
Schlichting
,
H.
, and
Gersten
,
K.
,
1979
,
Boundary-Layer Theory
,
Springer
,
Berlin
.
You do not currently have access to this content.