Graphical Abstract Figure
Graphical Abstract Figure
Close modal

Abstract

This paper investigates the seakeeping behavior of helicopters after an emergency landing in water, focusing on a Northern North Sea wave climate and considering a realistic helicopter geometry. Computational fluid dynamics techniques, including the cell-centered finite volume method and boundary element methods, were utilized to analyze motion responses and load distribution. The study ensures numerical result reliability through recommended simulation practices. Results indicate that the inviscid model produces similar outcomes to the viscous model in decay tests with roll, pitch, and heave motions. Natural periods for roll, pitch, and heave motions were obtained. Linearity between incident wave amplitude and pitch/heave response was noted for regular waves, while roll linearity was limited for small angles. In irregular wave conditions, helicopters tended to align perpendicular to waves over time, resulting in increased peak roll angles with higher significant wave heights. Exceedance rates of maximum roll peaks, useful for the assessment of capsizing probability, were quantified for different significant wave heights.

References

1.
European Aviation Safety Agency
,
2021
, Annual Safety Review 2021. Technical Report.
2.
Kharoufah
,
H.
,
Murray
,
J.
,
Baxter
,
G.
, and
Wild
,
G.
,
2018
, “
A Review of Human Factors Causations in Commercial Air Transport Accidents and Incidents: From to 2000–2016
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
,
99
(
5
), pp.
1
13
.
3.
National Transportation Safety Board
,
1998
, Aviation Coding Manual. Technical Report, National Transportation Safety Board.
4.
NTSB
,
2018
, NTSB AAR-19/04: Inadvertent Activation of the Fuel Shutoff Lever and Subsequent Ditching. Technical Report, National Transportation Safety Board.
5.
European Union Aviation Safety Agency
,
2020
, Certification Specifications and Acceptable Means of Compliance for Small Rotorcraft, CS-27, Amendment 9, Technical Report, European Union Aviation Safety Agency.
6.
European Union Aviation Safety Agency
,
2020
, Certification Specifications and Acceptable Means of Compliance for Small Rotorcraft. Technical Report, European Union Aviation Safety Agency.
7.
SMAES
,
2015
, Final Report Summary—SMAES (Smart Aircraft in Emergency Situations). Technical Report.
8.
Viana
,
J. T.
,
Espinosa de los Monteros
,
J.
, and
Climent
,
H.
,
2019
, “EU Research Project SARAH: Ditching Tests and Simulation of Real Aircraft Geometries,” Aerospace Structural Impact Dynamics International Conference—ASIDIC.
9.
Manderbacka
,
T.
,
Themelis
,
N.
,
Bačkalov
,
I.
,
Boulougouris
,
E.
,
Eliopoulou
,
E.
,
Hashimoto
,
H.
,
Konovessis
,
D.
, et al.,
2019
, “
An Overview of the Current Research on Stability of Ships and Ocean Vehicles: The STAB2018 Perspective
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
186
(
8
), p.
106090
.
10.
Neves
,
M. A.
,
2016
, “
Dynamic Stability of Ships in Regular and Irregular Seas - An Overview
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
120
(
7
), pp.
362
370
.
11.
Reilly
,
M. J.
,
1981
, Lightweight Emergency Flotation System for the CH-46 Helicopter. Technical Report, Naval Air Development Center, Warminster, PA.
12.
Wilson
,
F. T.
, and
Tucker
,
R. C. S.
,
1987
, “Ditching and Flotation Characteristics of the EH101 Helicopter,” Thirteenth European Rotorcraft Forum.
13.
Civil Aviation Authority
,
2005
, Summary Report on Helicopter Ditching and Crashworthiness Research—CAA Paper 2005/06. Technical Report.
14.
Cartwright
,
B.
,
Chhor
,
A. O.
, and
Groenenboom
,
P.
,
2010
, “
Numerical Simulation of a Helicopter Ditching With Emergency Flotation Devices
,” 5th International SPHERIC Workshop, Manchester, UK, June 22–25.
15.
Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory
,
1966
. Aircraft Ground-Flotation Investigation. Technical Report.
16.
Ahlvin
,
R. G.
, and
Brown
,
D. N.
,
1967
, “
Flotation Requirements for Aircraft
”.
Transactions
, Vol.
76
, pp.
2059
2084
.
17.
Katsuno
,
E. T.
,
Peters
,
A.
, and
El Moctar
,
O.
,
2023
, “Seakeeping Behavior of a Helicopter Landing in Waves”. Volume 7: CFD & FSI, American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
18.
Ferrandis
,
J. d. A.
,
Bonfiglio
,
L.
,
Rodríguez
,
R. Z.
,
Chryssostomidis
,
C.
,
Faltinsen
,
O. M.
, and
Triantafyllou
,
M.
,
2020
, “
Influence of Viscosity and Non-Linearities in Predicting Motions of a Wind Energy Offshore Platform in Regular Waves
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
142
(
6
), p.
062003
.
19.
Newman
,
J. N.
,
1967
, “
The Drift Force and Moment on Ships in Waves
,”
J. Ship Res.
,
11
(
1
), pp.
51
60
.
20.
Zhang
,
L.
,
Shi
,
W.
,
Karimirad
,
M.
,
Michailides
,
C.
, and
Jiang
,
Z.
,
2020
, “
Second-Order Hydrodynamic Effects on the Response of Three Semisubmersible Floating Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
207
(
7
), p.
107371
.
21.
Pinkster
,
J.
,
1980
, “
Low Frequency Second Order Wave Exciting Forces on Floating Structures
,” Ph.D. thesis,
TU Delft
,
The Netherlands
.
22.
ANSYS
,
2022
. AQWA Theory Manual. Technical Report.
23.
Moctar
,
O. e.
,
Shigunov
,
V.
, and
Zorn
,
T.
,
2012
, “
Duisburg Test Case: Post-Panamax Container Ship for Benchmarking
,”
Ship Tech. Res.
,
59
(
3
), pp.
50
64
.
24.
Moctar
,
O. e.
,
Sigmund
,
S.
,
Ley
,
J.
, and
Schellin
,
T. E.
,
2017
, “
Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Added Resistance of Ships in Waves
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
139
(
1
), p.
011301
.
25.
Sigmund
,
S.
, and
el Moctar
,
O.
,
2017
, “
Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Propulsion in Waves
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
144
(
11
), pp.
35
49
.
26.
Ley
,
J.
, and
el Moctar
,
O.
,
2021
, “
A Comparative Study of Computational Methods for Wave-Induced Motions and Loads
,”
J. Marine Sci. Eng.
,
9
(
1
), p.
83
.
27.
Siemens
,
2018
, STAR-CCM+ Documentation - Version 13.06.
28.
ITTC
,
2011
, Recommended Procedures and Guidelines: 7.5-03-02-03 Practical Guidelines for Ship CFD Applications. Technical Report.
29.
Ferziger
,
J. H.
,
Perić
,
M.
, and
Street
,
R. L.
,
2020
,
Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics
,
Springer International Publishing
,
Cham
.
30.
ITTC
,
2011
, Recommended Procedures and Guidelines: 7.5-02-07-04.5 Procedure Numerical Estimation of Roll Damping. Technical Report.
31.
Lewandowski
,
E. M.
,
2004
,
The Dynamics of Marine Craft: Maneuvering and Seakeeping
, Vol.
22
,
World Scientific
.
32.
ITTC
,
2017
, Recommended Procedures and Guidelines: 7.5-02-07-02.1 Seakeeping Experiments. Technical Report.
33.
Oberhagemann
,
J.
,
2017
, “
On Prediction of Wave-Induced Loads and Vibration of Ship Structures With Finite Volume Fluid Dynamic Methods
,” Ph.D. thesis,
University of Duisburg-Essen
,
Duisburg
.
34.
Burmester
,
S.
, and
Vaz
,
G.
,
2020
, “
Towards Credible CFD Simulations for Floating Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
209
(
8
), p.
107237
.
You do not currently have access to this content.