Designing reliable and cost-effective floating bridges for wide and deep fjords is very challenging. The floating bridge is subjected to various environmental loads, such as wind, wave, and current loads. All these loads and associated load effects should be properly evaluated for ultimate limit state design check. In this study, the wind-, wave-, and current-induced load effects are comprehensively investigated for an end-anchored curved floating bridge, which was an early concept for crossing the Bjørnafjorden. The considered floating bridge is about 4600 m long and consists of a cable-stayed high bridge part and a pontoon-supported low bridge part. It also has a large number of eigen-modes, which might be excited by the environmental loads. Modeling of wind loads on the bridge girder is first studied, indicating that apart from aerodynamic drag force, aerodynamic lift and moment on the bridge girder should also be considered due to their significant contribution to axial force. Turbulent wind spectrum and spatial coherence play an important role and should also be properly determined. The sway motion, axial force, and strong axis bending moment of the bridge girder are mainly induced by wind loads, while the heave motion, weak axis bending moment, and torsional moment are mainly induced by wave loads. Turbulent wind can cause significant larger low-frequency eigen-mode resonant responses than the second-order difference frequency wave loads. Current loads mainly contribute damping and reduce the variations of sway motion, axial force, and strong axis bending moment.

References

References
1.
Watanabe
,
E.
,
2003
, “
Floating Bridges: Past and Present
,”
Struct. Eng. Int.
,
13
(
2
), pp.
128
132
.
2.
Hartz
,
B.
,
1981
, “
Dynamic Response of the Hood-Canal Floating Bridge
,”
2nd ASCE/EMD Specialty Conference on Dynamic Response of Structures
, Atlanta, GA, Jan. 15–16.
3.
Kvåle
,
K. A.
,
Sigbjörnsson
,
R.
, and
Øiseth
,
O.
,
2016
, “
Modelling the Stochastic Dynamic Behaviour of a Pontoon Bridge: A Case Study
,”
Comput. Struct.
,
165
, pp.
123
135
.
4.
Langen
,
I.
, and
Sigbjörnsson
,
R.
,
1980
, “
On Stochastic Dynamics of Floating Bridges
,”
Eng. Struct.
,
2
(
4
), pp.
209
216
.
5.
Watanabe
,
E.
,
Maruyama
,
T.
,
Ueda
,
S.
, and
Tanaka
,
H.
,
2015
, “
Yumemai Floating Swing Arch Bridge of Osaka, Japan
,”
Large Floating Structures
,
Springer
,
Singapore
, pp.
61
90
.
6.
Wang
,
C. M.
,
Watanabe
,
E.
, and
Utsunomiya
,
T.
,
2007
,
Very Large Floating Structures
,
CRC Press
,
Taylor & Francis Group, London
.
7.
Wang
,
C.
, and
Wang
,
B.
,
2015
,
Large Floating Structures: Technological Advances
,
Springer
,
Singapore
.
8.
Eidem
,
M. E.
,
2017
, “
Overview of Floating Bridge Projects in Norway
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2017-62714.
9.
Løken
,
A. E.
,
Oftedal
,
R. A.
, and
Aarsnes
,
J. V.
,
1990
, “
Aspects of Hydrodynamic Loading and Responses in Design of Floating Bridges
,”
Second Symposium on Strait Crossings
, Trondheim, Norway, June 10–13.
10.
Seif
,
M. S.
, and
Inoue
,
Y.
,
1998
, “
Dynamic Analysis of Floating Bridges
,”
Mar. Struct.
,
11
(
1–2
), pp.
29
46
.
11.
Fu
,
S.
,
Cui
,
W.
,
Chen
,
X.
, and
Wang
,
C.
,
2005
, “
Hydroelastic Analysis of a Nonlinearly Connected Floating Bridge Subjected to Moving Loads
,”
Mar. Struct.
,
18
(
1
), pp.
85
107
.
12.
Fu
,
S.
,
Wei
,
W.
,
Ou
,
S.
,
Moan
,
T.
,
Deng
,
S.
, and
Lie
,
H.
,
2017
, “
A Time-Domain Method for Hydroelastic Analysis of Floating Bridges in Inhomogeneous Waves
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2017-62534.
13.
Sun
,
J.
,
Jiang
,
P.
,
Sun
,
Y.
,
Song
,
C.
, and
Wang
,
D.
,
2017
, “
An Experimental Investigation on the Nonlinear Hydroelastic Response of a Pontoon-Type Floating Bridge Under Regular Wave Action
,”
Ships Offshore Struct.
,
13
(
3
), pp.
1
11
.
14.
Lie
,
H.
,
Fu
,
S.
,
Fylling
,
I.
,
Fredriksen
,
A. G.
,
Bonnemaire
,
B.
, and
Kjersem
,
G. L.
,
2016
, “
Numerical Modelling of Floating and Submerged Bridges Subjected to Wave, Current and Wind
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2016-54851.
15.
Sha
,
Y.
,
Amdahl
,
J.
,
Aalberg
,
A.
, and
Yu
,
Z.
,
2018
, “
Numerical Investigations of the Dynamic Response of a Floating Bridge Under Environmental Loadings
,”
Ships Offshore Struct.
(in press).
16.
Xu
,
Y.
,
Øiseth
,
O.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2017
, “
Time Domain Modelling of Frequency Dependent Wind and Wave Forces on a Three-Span Suspension Bridge With Two Floating Pylons Using State Space Models
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2017-62721.
17.
Cheng
,
Z.
,
Gao
,
Z.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2018
, “
Hydrodynamic Load Modeling and Analysis of a Floating Bridge in Homogeneous Wave Conditions
,”
Mar. Struct.
,
59
, pp.
122
141
.
18.
Cheng
,
Z.
,
Gao
,
Z.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2018
, “
Wave Load Effect Analysis of a Floating Bridge in a Fjord Considering Inhomogeneous Wave Conditions
,”
Eng. Struct.
,
163
, pp.
197
214
.
19.
COWI,
2016
, “
Curved Bridge Navigation Channel in South—Environmental Loading Analysis
,” Report for the Norwegian Public Road Administration, COWI AS, Oslo, Norway, Report No. NOT-HYDA-018.
20.
COWI
,
2016
, “
Curve Bridge Navigation Channel in South—Summary of Analyses
,” Report for the Norwegian Public Road Administration, COWI AS, Oslo, Norway, Report No.
NOT-KTEKA-021
https://www.vegvesen.no/_attachment/1605060/binary/1145259?fast_title=Bj%C3%B8rnafjorden+Endeforankret+flytebun+-+Oppsumering+av+analyser.pdf.
21.
MARINTEK
,
2012
,
Simo-Theory Manual Version 4.0
,
MARINTEK
, Trondheim, Norway.
22.
MARINTEK,
2012
,
Rifelx Theory Manual, Version 4.0
,
MARINTEK
, Trondheim, Norway
23.
SVV
,
2016
,
Design Basis Metocean
,
Statens Vegvesen
,
Oslo, Norway
.
24.
Cheng
,
Z.
,
Svangstu
,
E.
,
Gao
,
Z.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2018
, “
Field Measurements of Inhomogeneous Wave Conditions in Bjørnafjorden
,”
J. Waterw., Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng.
(in press).
25.
Lothe
,
A.
, and
Musch
,
O.
,
2015
, “
Bjørnafjorden Submerged Floating Tube Bridge: Sea State Simulations
,” Norconsult AS, Trondheim, Norway.
26.
Jonkman
,
B. J.
,
2009
, “
Turbsim User's Guide: Version 1.50
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA, Technical Report No.
NREL/TP-500-46198
https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy09osti/46198.pdf.
27.
IEC
,
2005
, “
Wind Turbines—Part 1: Design Requirements
,” International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No.
IEC 61400-1:2005
https://webstore.iec.ch/preview/info_iec61400-1%7Bed3.0%7Den.pdf.
28.
Vegvesen
,
S.
,
2015
,
Handbok N400, Bruprosjektering
,
Statens Vegnesen
,
Oslo, Norway
.
29.
Faltinsen
,
O. M.
,
1995
,
Sea Loads on Ships and Offshore Structures
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
30.
Cummins
,
W. E.
,
1962
, “
The Impulse Response Function and Ship Motions
,” Institut fur Schiffbau, Universitat Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
31.
DNV GL
,
2014
, “
Environmental Conditions and Environmental Loads
,” Det Norske Veritas AS, Oslo, Norway, Standard No. DNV-RP-C205.
32.
Strømmen
,
E.
,
2010
,
Theory of Bridge Aerodynamics
, 2nd ed.,
Springer
, Berlin.
33.
Larsen
,
A.
, and
Walther
,
J. H.
,
1998
, “
Discrete Vortex Simulation of Flow Around Five Generic Bridge Deck Sections
,”
J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
,
77–78
, pp.
591
602
.
You do not currently have access to this content.