The industry consensus would appear that the effect of currents on wave-induced fatigue damage accumulation is assumed as insignificant and can be ignored. Only when dealing with stability, ultimate limit state design, and vortex-induced vibration (VIV), is the recommended industry practice to consider both currents and waves simultaneously, except for fatigue design. This paper presents a study on how environmental loads should be considered in terms of currents and waves for the fatigue life design of offshore pipelines and risers. The study is intended as a spur to redress the misapprehension by focusing on the coupling effect of direct waves and currents in the context of fatigue damage assessment. It is demonstrated unequivocally that waves and currents cannot be decoupled for fatigue design assessments. Wave-induced fatigue with the inclusion of currents is manifested twofold, not only the increased mean stress correction effect but also higher total damage accumulation due to elevated stress ranges. The practice of using wave histograms while ignoring currents is shown to result in an unacceptable nonconservative fatigue design. Both effects should be accounted for in the engineering assessment. A first-order correction factor involving the ratio of current and wave velocities is introduced to evaluating the environmental load coupling effect. It is recognized that fatigue associated specifically with VIV phenomena is well understood and documented elsewhere, its discussion is thus out with the aims of this paper.

References

References
1.
ASAS-OFFSHORE
,
2009
, “
WAVE User Manual
,” Vol.
12
, ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
2.
HSE
,
2001
, “
Comparison of Fatigue Provisions in Codes and Standards
,” Health and Safety Executive, Norwich, UK, Offshore Technology Report No.
2001/083
.http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/otopdf/2001/oto01083.pdf
3.
API
,
2010
, “
Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Working Stress Design
,” American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, Report No.
API RP 2A-WSD
.http://latorebondeng90245.tripod.com/api_rp2a.pdf
4.
DNV
,
2011
, “
Fatigue Design of Offshore Steel Structures
,” Det Norske Veritas, Høvik, Norway, Report No.
RP-C203
.https://rules.dnvgl.com/docs/pdf/DNV/codes/docs/2011-10/RP-C203.pdf
5.
DNV
,
2010
, “
Riser Fatigue
,” Det Norske Veritas, Høvik, Norway, Report No.
DNV-RP-F204
.http://rules.dnvgl.com/docs/pdf/DNV/codes/docs/2010-10/RP-F204.pdf
6.
Lim
,
T.
, and
Koska
,
R.
,
2013
, “
Overcoming Installation Challenges to Wellhead and Conductor Fatigue
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2013-11112.
7.
Mørk
,
K. J.
,
Sødahl
,
N.
, and
Chezhian
,
M.
,
2002
, “
Enhanced Risk Based Fatigue Criterion
,”
Deep Offshore Technology Conference
, New Orleans, LA, Nov. 13–15.
8.
Jia
,
J.
,
2008
, “
An Efficient Nonlinear Dynamic Approach for Calculating Wave Induced Fatigue Damage of Offshore Structures and Its Industrial Applications for Lifetime Extension
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
,
30
(
3
), pp.
189
198
.
9.
McNeil
,
S.
,
Agarwal
,
P.
,
Kluk
,
D.
,
Bhalla
,
K.
, and
Young
,
R.
,
2014
, “
Subsea Wellhead and Riser Fatigue Monitoring in a Strong Surface and Submerged Current Environment
,”
Offshore Technology Conference
(OTC), Houston, TX, May 5–8, Paper No.
OTC-25403-MS
.
10.
Liu
,
H.
, and
Zhao
,
X.
,
2013
, “
Fatigue of Subsea Pipelines Under Combined Actions
,”
International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
, Anchorage, AK, June 30–July 4, Paper No.
ISOPE-I-13-236
https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/ISOPE-I-13-236
11.
DNV
,
2006
, “
Free Spanning Pipelines
,” Det Norske Veritas, Høvik, Norway, Report No.
DNV RP-F105
.http://rules.dnvgl.com/docs/pdf/DNV/codes/docs/2006-02/RP-F105.pdf
12.
DNV
,
2010
, “
Environmental Conditions and Environmental Loads
,” Det Norske Veritas, Høvik, Norway, Report No.
DNV RP-C205
.https://rules.dnvgl.com/docs/pdf/dnv/codes/docs/2010-10/rp-c205.pdf
13.
Ince
,
A.
, and
Glinka
,
G.
,
2011
, “
A Modification of Morrow and Smith-Watson-Topper Mean Stress Correction Models
,”
Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct.
,
34
(
11
), pp.
854
867
.
14.
DNV
,
2013
, “
Submarine Pipeline Systems
,” Det Norske Veritas, Høvik, Norway, Report No.
DNV OS-F101
.https://rules.dnvgl.com/docs/pdf/DNV/codes/docs/2012-08/Os-F101.pdf
You do not currently have access to this content.