A steel riser has benefits over a flexible riser in terms of pressure rating and cost. A steel riser in lazy wave configuration (steel lazy wave riser (SLWR)) is often considered as a good alternative solution for harsh environments where large floater excursions take place. The SLWR configuration is achieved by introducing buoyancy modules into a steel catenary riser (SCR). The buoyancy modules act as a damper and isolate the floater motions from the critical touchdown area. Hence, the SLWR generally has better overall performance than an SCR configuration. This paper attempts to analyze the correlation between the geometric shapes of the SLWR configuration with its capability to absorb the dynamic loadings. For deepwater cases, the behavior of the bottom part of the riser is correlated with the velocity experiences at the riser's hang-off location. Hence, the riser's performance is analyzed by comparing the velocity at the riser's hang-off with the velocity at the sag, hog, and near touchdown. The geometric shape of an SLWR is represented by its arch height, which is the vertical distance between the lowest point at the sag and the highest point at the hog bend of a riser. The results show that there is a correlation between the arch height of an SLWR with the riser's strength and wave-induced fatigue performance. SLWR configurations with higher arch generally have greater capability to absorb the dynamic loadings, as indicated by the lower velocities along the riser, which leads to lower stress utilizations and lower fatigue damage.

References

References
1.
Karunakaran
,
D.
,
Nordsve
,
N. T.
, and
Olufsen
,
A.
,
1996
, “
An Efficient Metal Riser Configuration for Ship and Semi Based Production Systems
,”
Sixth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
(
ISOPE
), The International Society of Polar and Offshore Engineers, Los Angeles, CA, Vol.
2
, Paper No. I-96-106.
2.
Yue
,
B.
,
Walters
,
D.
,
Yu
,
W.
,
Raghavan
,
K.
, and
Thompson
,
H.
,
2011
, “
Lazy Wave SCR on Turret Moored FPSO
,”
21st International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
(
ISOPE
), The International Society of Polar and Offshore Engineers, Maui, HI, Paper No. I-11-561.
3.
Aubeny
,
C. P.
,
Biscontin
,
G.
, and
Zhang
,
J.
,
2006
, “
Seafloor Interaction With Steel Catenary Risers
,” Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, Technical Report No. 1435-01-04-CA-35515.
4.
Randolph
,
M.
, and
Quiggin
,
P.
,
2009
, “
Non-Linear Hysteretic Seabed Model for Catenary Pipeline Contact
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2009-79259.
5.
Felisita
,
A.
,
Gudmestad
,
O. T.
,
Karunakaran
,
D.
, and
Martinsen
,
L. O.
,
2015
, “
Review of Steel Lazy Wave Riser Concepts for North Sea
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2015-41182.
6.
Legras
,
J.-L.
,
2008
, “
Vessel Motion Based Laying Criteria for Rigid and Flexible Pipes in Deepwater
,”
18th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
(
ISOPE
), The International Society of Polar and Offshore Engineers, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 6–11, Paper No. I-08-069.
7.
Legras
,
J.-L.
,
Karunakaran
,
D. N.
, and
Jones
,
R. L.
,
2013
, “
Fatigue Enhancement of SCRs: Design Applying Weight Distribution and Optimized Fabrication
,”
Offshore Technology Conference
, Houston, TX, Paper No. OTC-23945.
8.
Felisita
,
A.
,
Gudmestad
,
O. T.
,
Karunakaran
,
D.
, and
Martinsen
,
L. O.
,
2016
, “
A Review of VIV Responses of Steel Lazy Wave Riser
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2016-54321.
9.
Karunakaran
,
D.
,
Meling
,
T. S.
,
Kristoffersen
,
S.
, and
Lund
,
K. M.
,
2005
, “
Weight-Optimized SCRs for Deepwater Harsh Environments
,”
Offshore Technology Conference
, Houston, TX, Paper No. OTC-17224.
10.
Orcina
,
2010
, “
OrcaFlex Version 9.8b
,” Program Manual, Orcina, Cumbria, UK.
11.
DNV-GL
,
2010
, “
Dynamic Risers
,” Det Norske Veritas, Høvik, Oslo, Norway, Standard No. DNV-OS-F201.
12.
DNV-GL
,
2014
, “
Environmental Conditions and Environmental Loads
,” Det Norske Veritas, Høvik, Oslo, Norway, Standard No. DNV-RP-C205.
13.
DNV-GL
,
2011
, “
Fatigue Design of Offshore Steel Structures
,” Det Norske Veritas, Høvik, Oslo, Norway, Standard No. DNV-RP-C203.
14.
Li
,
S.
, and
Nguyen
,
C.
,
2010
, “
Dynamic Response of Deepwater Lazy-Wave Catenary Riser
,”
Deep Offshore Technology International
, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
15.
StandardsNorway
,
2007
, “
Actions and Action Effects
,” Standards Norway, Lysaker, Norway, Standard No. NORSOK Standard N-003.
16.
DNV-GL
,
2013
, “
Submarine Pipeline Systems
,” Det Norske Veritas, Høvik, Oslo, Norway, Standard No. DNV-OS-F101.
You do not currently have access to this content.