Understanding well conductor–soil interaction mechanism plays an important role in well integrity assessment. Evaluation of field data obtained from monitored offshore wells can provide valuable insights into the matter. This paper presents a comparison of the numerical results obtained from a full three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) analyses model of the blowout preventer (BOP), wellhead (WH), conductor, and surface casing versus the field measured data obtained during drilling operations. Sensitivity studies were also performed for several parameters that were considered important in the local well response analysis under observed sea state conditions. The conductor–soil analyses were simulated using the Winkler spring p–y curves obtained by two different approaches: American Petroleum Institute (API) RP2GEO and a recently developed model by Zakeri et al. The results of bending moments in conductor and surface casing have indicated good agreement between FE model results and the field measurements.

References

References
1.
Myhre
,
E.
,
Eilertsen
,
L. E.
,
Russo
,
M.
,
Johansen
,
F.
,
Hart
,
C.
, and
Kalhovd
,
T. J.
,
2015
, “
Successful Real Time Instrumentation of the Conductor and Surface Casing of an Exploration Subsea Well in the North Sea to Measure the Actual Loads Experienced During Drilling Operations
,”
Offshore Technology Conference
, Houston, TX, May, 4–7, Paper No. OTC-25770-MS.
2.
Russo
,
M.
,
Myhre
,
E.
,
Wolak
,
U.
, and
Grytøyr
,
G.
,
2015
, “
Measured Wellhead Loads During Drilling Operations: Paper 1—Data Processing and Preliminary Results
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2015-41445.
3.
API
,
2011
, “
API Recommended Practice 2GEO/ISO 19901-4
,”
Geotechnical and Foundation Design Considerations
,
1st ed.
,
American Petroleum Institute
,
Washington, DC
.
4.
Matlock
,
H.
,
1970
, “
Correlations for Design of Laterally Loaded Piles in Soft Clay
,”
Offshore Technology Conference
, Houston, TX, Apr. 22–24, pp.
577
594
.
5.
Zakeri
,
A.
,
Clukey
,
E.
,
Kebadaze
,
B.
,
Jeanjean
,
P.
,
Walker
,
D.
,
Piercey
,
G.
,
Templeton
,
J.
,
Connelly
,
L.
, and
Aubeny
,
C.
, 2015, “Recent Advances in Soil Response Modeling for Well Conductor Fatigue Analysis and Development of New Approaches,”
Offshore Technology Conference
, Houston, TX, May, 4–7, Paper No. OTC-25795-MS.
6.
Zakeri
,
A.
,
Clukey
,
E. C.
,
Kebadze
,
B. E.
, and
Jeanjean
,
P.
,
2016
, “
Fatigue Analysis of Offshore Well Conductors—Part I: Study Overview and Evaluation of Series 1 Centrifuge Tests in Normally Consolidated to Lightly Over-Consolidated Kaolin Clay
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
,
57
, pp.
78
95
.
7.
Zakeri
,
A.
,
Clukey
,
E. C.
,
Kebadze
,
B. E.
, and
Jeanjean
,
P.
,
2016
, “
Fatigue Analysis of Offshore Well Conductors—Part II: Development New Approaches for Conductor Fatigue Analysis in Clays and Sands
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
,
57
, pp.
96
113
.
8.
Jeanjean
,
P
.,
2009
, “
Re-Assessment of P-Y Curves for Soft Clays From Centrifuge Testing and Finite Element Modeling
,”
Offshore Technology Conference
, Houston, TX, May 4–7, Paper No. 20158.
9.
Authen
,
K.
, and
Grytøyr
,
G.
,
2015
, “
Reliable, Low Footprint and Cost-Effective Monitoring of Wellhead Loads Using Autonomous IMUs For Fatigue Estimates
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2015-41882.
10.
Grytøyr
,
G.
,
Coral
,
F.
,
Lindstad
,
H. B.
, and
Russo
,
M.
, “
Wellhead Fatigue Damage Based on Indirect Measurements
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2015-41379.
11.
Buitrago
,
H.
,
Krishnan
,
V.
, and
Sommerfield
,
P. M.
,
2011
, “
Fatigue Assessment of Subsea Tree Connectors and Wellheads
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2011-49853.
12.
Reinås
,
L.
,
Hørte
,
F.
,
Sæther
,
M.
, and
Grytøyr
,
G.
,
2011
, “
Wellhead Fatigue Analysis Method
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2011-50026.
13.
Holden
,
H.
,
Bjønnes
,
P.
, and
Russo
,
M.
,
2013
, “
A Simplified Methodology for Comparing Fatigue Loading on Subsea Wellheads
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2013-11529.
14.
Sparks
,
C. P.
,
2007
,
Fundamentals of Marine Riser Mechanics: Basic Principles and Simplified Analyses
,
PennWell
,
Tulsa, OK
.
15.
ISO
,
2005
, “
Design and Operation of Subsea Production Systems—Part 7: Completion/Workover Riser Systems
,” International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. ISO 13628-7.
16.
Abaqus
,
2013
, “
Abaqus 6.13
,” Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., Waltham, MA.
You do not currently have access to this content.