Oil and gas exploration and production have been expanding in Arctic waters. However, numerical models for predicting the ice-induced vibrations (IIV) of offshore structures are still lacking in the literature. This study aims to develop a mathematical reduced-order model for predicting the two-dimensional IIV of offshore structures with geometric coupling and nonlinearities. A cylindrical structure subject to a moving uniform ice sheet is analyzed using the well-known Matlock model, which, in the present study, is extended and modified to account for a new empirical nonlinear stress–strain rate relationship determining the maximum compressive stress (MCS) of the ice. The model is further developed through the incorporation of ice temperature, brine content, air volume, grain size, ice thickness, and ice wedge angle effects on the ice compressive strength. These allow the effect of multiple ice properties on the ice–structure interaction to be investigated. A further advancement is the inclusion of an equation allowing the length of failed ice at a point of failure to vary with time. A mixture of existing equations and newly proposed empirical relationships is used. Structural geometric nonlinearities are incorporated into the numerical model through the use of Duffing oscillators, a technique previously proposed in vortex-induced vibration studies. The model is validated against results from the literature and provides new insights into IIV responses including the quasi-static, randomlike chaotic, and locked-in motions, depending on the ice velocity and system nonlinearities. This numerical Matlock–Duffing model shows a potential to be used in future IIV analysis of Arctic cylindrical structures, particularly fixed offshore structures, such as lighthouses, gravity bases, and wind turbine monopiles.

References

1.
Peyton
,
H. R.
,
1966
, “
Sea Ice Strength
,” Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, Anchorage, AK,
Report No. UAG-182
.
2.
Matlock
,
H.
,
Dawkinds
,
W. P.
, and
Panak
,
J. J.
,
1969
, “
A Model for the Prediction of Ice-Structure Interaction
,”
Offshore Technology Conference
, Dallas, TX, Paper No. OTC-1066.
3.
Maattanen
,
M.
,
1978
, “
On Conditions for the Rise of Self-Excited Ice-Induced Autonomous Oscillations in Slender Marine Pile Structures
,” Winter Navigation Research Board, Helsinki, Finland, Research Report No. 25.
4.
Eranti
,
E.
,
1992
, “
Dynamic Ice-Structure Interaction: Theory and Applications
,” Ph.D. dissertation, VTT Publications
No. 90
, Helsinki University of Technology, Technical Research Center of Finland, Espoo, Finland.
5.
Riska
,
K.
, and
Baarman
,
L.
,
1993
, “
A Model for Ice Induced Vibration of Slender Offshore Structures
,”
12th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions (POAC)
, Hamburg, Germany, pp.
578
594
.
6.
Sodhi
,
D. S.
,
1994
, “
A Theoretical Model for Ice-Structure Interaction
,”
12th IAHR Symposium on Ice
, Trondheim, Norway, pp.
807
815
.
7.
Karna
,
T.
,
Kamesaki
,
K.
, and
Tsukuda
,
H.
,
1999
, “
A Numerical Model for Dynamic Ice-Structure Interaction
,”
Comput. Struct.
,
72
(4–5), pp.
645
658
.
8.
Withalm
,
M.
, and
Hoffman
,
N. P.
,
2010
, “
Simulation of Full-Scale Ice-Structure Interaction by an Extended Matlock Model
,”
Cold Reg. Sci. Technol.
,
60
(
2
), pp.
130
136
.
9.
Palmer
,
A.
,
Yue
,
Q.
, and
Guo
,
F.
,
2010
, “
Ice-Induced Vibration
,”
Cold Reg. Sci. Technol.
,
60
(
3
), pp.
189
192
.
10.
Guo
,
F.
,
2012
, “
Reanalysis of Ice Induced Steady State Vibration From an Engineering Perspective
,”
21st IAHR Symposium on Ice
, Dalian, China, pp.
1023
1034
.
11.
Srinil
,
N.
, and
Zanganeh
,
H.
,
2012
, “
Modeling of Coupled Cross-Flow/In-Line Vortex-Induced Vibrations Using Double Duffing and van der Pol Oscillators
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
53
, pp.
83
97
.
12.
Kim
,
H.
, and
Keune
,
J.
,
2007
, “
Compressive Strength of Ice at Impact Strain Rates
,”
J. Mater. Sci.
,
42
(
8
), pp.
2802
2806
.
13.
International Standards Organization, ISO 19906
,
2010
,
Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries-Arctic Offshore Structures
,
ISO
, Geneva, Switzerland.
14.
Yue
,
Q.
,
Bi
,
X.
,
Zhang
,
X.
, and
Karna
,
T.
,
2002
, “
Dynamic Ice Forces Caused by Crushing Failure
,” 16th
IAHR
Symposium on Ice
, Dunedin, New Zealand, Dec. 2–6, pp.
134
141
.
15.
Tuhkuri
,
J. A.
,
Goldstein
,
R. V.
, and
Osipenko
,
N. M.
,
1997
, “
Modeling of the Fracture Surface of an Ice Block Failing Against a Structure
,”
16th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
, Vol.
4
, pp.
263
269
.
16.
Schulson
,
E.
,
2001
, “
Brittle Failure of Ice
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
,
68
(17–18), pp.
1839
1887
.
17.
Sanderson
,
T.
,
1988
,
Ice Mechanics: Risks to Offshore Structures
,
Graham and Trotman
,
London
.
18.
Nakawo
,
M.
,
1983
, “
Measurements on Air Porosity of Sea Ice
,” 2nd Symposium on Applied Glaciology, Hanover, NH, Aug. 23–27, pp.
204
208
.
19.
Cole
,
D.
,
1985
, “
Grain Size and the Compressive Strength of Ice
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
107
(
3
), pp.
369
374
.
20.
Timco
,
G.
, and
Jordaan
,
I.
,
1987
, “
Time-Series Variations in Ice Crushing
,”
9th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions (POAC)
, Fairbanks, AK, pp.
13
20
.
21.
Whitney
,
J.
,
2002
, “
Cook Inlet, Alaska: Oceanographic and Ice Conditions and NOAA's 18-Year Oil Spill Response History 1984-2001
,” National Ocean Services, Anchorage, AK, NOAA Hazmat Report No. 2003-01.
22.
PND Engineering
,
2006
, “
Knik Arm Crossing Final Ice Condition Findings
,” Technical Report, AKSAS Project No. 56047, Anchorage, AK.
23.
Karna
,
T.
,
Andresen
,
H.
,
Gurtner
,
A.
,
Metrikine
,
A.
,
Sodhi
,
D.
,
Loo
,
M.
,
Kuiper
,
G.
,
Gibson
,
R.
,
Fenz
,
D.
,
Muggeridge
,
K.
,
Wallenburg
,
C.
,
Wu
,
J.-F.
, and
Jefferies
,
M.
,
2013
, “
Ice-Induced Vibrations of Offshore Structures–Looking Beyond ISO 19906
,”
22nd International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions (POAC)
, Espoo, Finland, pp.
1673
1684
.
You do not currently have access to this content.