Model tests were conducted on three generic floating wind turbine systems in 2011 and reported in a series of papers at the 31st Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Conference in 2012. These tests were conducted at the MARIN facility in The Netherlands, by a consortium of universities, government research organizations, and industry. As part of the testing program, decay tests in platform pitch were conducted with and without wind forcing. It was found that for spar and semisubmersible type structures, resonant pitch motion was damped due to wind in storm sea conditions. The nonlinear decay motion of a floating wind turbine platform is modeled using a one degree-of-freedom nonlinear oscillation equation about a mean offset angle. Attention is paid to the turbine thrust coefficient and its variability with respect to oncoming flow speed, which in turn is affected by the structure pitch motion. The equation of motion reveals that the mean offset position has an important role in the stiffness, damping, and consequently the natural period of pitch motion. Several important dimensionless parameters are introduced. The paper discusses a simple thrust model for an offshore wind turbine (OWT) based on rudiments of blade element theory. Using the simplified thrust coefficient formulation, the increase in platform pitch damping due to wind is formulated. Experimental data reported from prior tests described above show good agreement with the theoretical model.

References

References
1.
Martin
,
H.
,
Kimball
,
R.
,
Viselli
,
A.
, and
Goupee
,
A.
,
2012
, “
Methodology for Wind/Wave Basin Testing of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering
,
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
, July 1–6, Paper No. OMAE2012-83627.
2.
Kimball
,
R.
,
Goupee
,
A.
,
Coulling
,
A.
, and
Dagher
,
H.
,
2012
, “
Model Test Comparisons of TLP, Spar-buoy and Semi-Submersible Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Systems
,”
Society of Naval Architects Marine Engineering Annual Meeting
,
Providence, RI
, Oct. 24–26, pp. 86–95, Paper No. A16.
3.
Koo
,
B.
,
Lambrakos
,
K.
,
Goupee
,
A.
, and
Kimball
,
R.
,
2012
, “
Model Tests for a Floating Wind Turbine on Three Different Floaters
,”
31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering
,
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
, July 1–6, Paper No. 83642.
4.
Roddier
,
D.
,
Cermelli
,
C.
,
Aubault
,
A.
, and
Weinstein
,
A.
,
2011
, “
WindFloat: A Floating Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy
,
2
, pp.
1
34
.10.1063/1.3435339
5.
Jonkman
,
J. M.
,
2007
, “
Dynamics Modeling and Loads Analysis of an Offshore Floating Wind Turbine
,” National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO, Technical Report No. NREL/TP-500-41958.
6.
Skaare
,
B.
,
Hanson
,
T. D.
,
Yttervik
,
R.
, and
Nielsen
,
F. G.
,
2011
, “
Dynamic Response and Control of the Hywind Demo Floating Wind Turbine
,”
Proceedings European Wind Energy Conference
,
Warsaw, Poland
, pp. 53–57.
7.
Jonkman
,
J.
,
2010
, “
Definition of the Floating System for Phase IV of OC3
,” National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO, Technical Report No. NREL/TP-500-47535.
8.
Crozier
,
A.
,
2011
, “
Design and Dynamic Modeling of the Support Structure for a 10 MW Offshore Wind Turbine
,” Masters thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
9.
Bottasso
,
C.
,
2011
,
Short Course on Wind Energy—Scale Effects in Wind Turbines
,
Politecnico di Milano
,
Milan, Italy
.
10.
Wei
,
T.
,
2010
,
Wind Power Generation and Wind Turbine Design
,
WIT, Southampton
,
UK
.
11.
Lanzafame
,
R.
,
Mauro
,
S.
, and
Messina
,
M.
,
2013
, “
Wind Turbine CFD Modeling Using a Correlation-Based Transitional Model
,”
Renewable Energy
,
52
, pp.
31
39
.10.1016/j.renene.2012.10.007
12.
Jonkman
,
J. M.
, and
Sclavounos
,
P. D.
,
2006
, “
Development of Fully Coupled Aeroelastic and Hydrodynamic Models for Offshore Wind Turbines
,” National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO, Technical Report No. NREL/CP-500-39066.
13.
Kerwin
,
J. E.
,
2001
,
Hydrofoils and Propellers, Lecture Notes
,
Massachusetts Inst. Technology
,
Boston, MA
.
14.
Musial
,
W.
,
Butterfield
,
S.
, and
Boone
,
A.
,
2004
, “
Feasibility of Floating Platform Systems for Wind Turbines
,”
ASME
Paper No. NREL/CP-500-34874.10.1115/NREL/CP-500-34874
15.
Matha
,
D.
,
2010
, “
Model Development and Loads Analysis of an Offshore Wind Turbine on a Tension Leg Platform With a Comparison to Other Floating Turbine Concepts
,” National Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO, Technical Report No. NREL/SR-500-45891.
16.
Nihei
,
Y.
,
Fujioka
,
H.
,
Matsuura
,
M.
, and
Suzuki
,
H.
,
2011
, “
An Approach for the Optimum Design of TLP Type Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering
,
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
, June 19–24, Paper No. 50258.
17.
Goupee
,
A.
,
Koo
,
B.
,
Kimball
,
R.
,
Lambrakos
,
K.
, and
Dagher
,
H.
,
2012
, “
Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts
,”
31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering
,
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
, June 19–24, Paper No. 83645.
19.
Chakrabarti
,
S. K.
,
1994
,
Offshore Structure Modeling
,
World Scientific
,
Singapore
.
20.
Carriveau
,
R.
,
2011
,
Fundamental and Advanced Topics in Wind Power
,
InTech
,
Rijeka, Croatia
, Chap. 1.
You do not currently have access to this content.