Wind energy is a promising alternate energy resource. However, the on-land wind farms are limited by space, noise, and visual pollution and, therefore, many countries build wind farms near the shore. Until now, most offshore wind farms have been built in relatively shallow water (less than 30 m) with fixed tower type wind turbines. Recently, several countries have planned to move wind farms to deep water offshore locations to find stronger and steadier wind fields as compared to near shore locations. For the wind farms in deeper water, floating platforms have been proposed to support the wind turbine. The model tests described in this paper were performed at MARIN (maritime research institute netherlands) with a model setup corresponding to a 1:50 Froude scaling. The wind turbine was a scaled model of the national renewable energy lab (NREL) 5 MW horizontal axis reference wind turbine supported by three different generic floating platforms: a spar, a semisubmersible, and a tension-leg platform (TLP). The wave environment used in the tests is representative of the offshore in the state of Maine. In order to capture coupling between the floating platform and the wind turbine, the 1st bending mode of the turbine tower was also modeled. The main purpose of the model tests was to generate data on coupled motions and loads between the three floating platforms and the same wind turbine for the operational, design, and survival seas states. The data are to be used for the calibration and improvement of the existing design analysis and performance numerical codes. An additional objective of the model tests was to establish the advantages and disadvantages among the three floating platform concepts on the basis of the test data. The paper gives details of the scaled model wind turbine and floating platforms, the setup configurations, and the instrumentation to measure motions, accelerations, and loads along with the wind turbine rpm, torque, and thrust for the three floating wind turbines. The data and data analysis results are discussed in the work of Goupee et al. (2012, “Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts,” OMAE 2012-83645).

References

References
1.
Musial
,
W.
,
Butterfield
,
S.
, and
Ram
,
B.
,
2006
, “
Energy From Offshore Wind
,”
Offshore Technology Conference
,
Houston, TX
.
2.
Bae
,
Y.
,
Kim
,
M. H.
, and
Shin
,
Y. S.
,
2010
, “
Rotor-Floater-Mooring Coupled Dynamic Analysis of Mini-TLP-Type Offshore Floating Wind Turbines
,” Paper No. OMAE2010-20555.
3.
Skare
,
B.
,
Hanson
,
T. D.
,
Nielsen
,
F. G.
,
Yttervik
,
R.
,
Hansen
,
A. M.
,
Thomesn
,
K.
and
Larsen
,
T. J.
,
2007
, “
Integrated Dynamic Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
European Wind Energy Conference
,
Milan, Italy
.
4.
Roddier
,
D.
,
Cermelli
,
C.
,
Aubault
,
A.
, and
Weinstin
,
A.
,
2010
, “
WindFloat: A Floating Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy
,
2
, p.
033104
.10.1063/1.3435339
5.
Martin
,
H.
,
2011
, “
Development of a Scale Model Wind Turbine for Testing of Offshore Floating Wind Turbine Systems
,” M.Sc. thesis, The University of Maine, Orono, ME.
6.
Jonkman
,
J. M.
,
2010
, “
Definition of the Floating System for Phase IV of OC3
,” Technical Report No. NREL/TP-500-47535.
7.
Ridder
,
E.
,
Koop
,
A.
, and
Wilde
,
J.
,
2012
, “
High Quality Wind Setup for Model Testing Floating Wind Turbines in an Offshore Basin
,” Paper No. OMAE2012-83101.
8.
American Petroleum Institute
,
2000
, “API Recommend and Practice 2A-WSD: Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Working Stress Design,” 21st ed, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC.
9.
Goupee
,
A.
,
Koo
,
B.
,
Kimball
,
R.
,
Lambrakos
,
K.
, and
Dagher
,
H.
,
2012
, “
Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts
,” Paper No. OMAE 2012-83645.
You do not currently have access to this content.