Scale-model wave basin testing is often employed in the development and validation of large-scale offshore vessels and structures by the oil and gas, military, and marine industries. A basin-model test requires less time, resources, and risk than a full-scale test, while providing real and accurate data for numerical simulator validation. As the development of floating wind turbine technology progresses in order to capture the vast deep-water wind energy resource, it is clear that model testing will be essential for the economical and efficient advancement of this technology. However, the scale model testing of floating wind turbines requires accurate simulation of the wind and wave environments, structural flexibility, and wind turbine aerodynamics and thus requires a comprehensive scaling methodology. This paper presents a unified methodology for Froude scale model testing of floating wind turbines under combined wind and wave loading. First, an overview of the scaling relationships employed for the environment, floater, and wind turbine are presented. Afterward, a discussion is presented concerning suggested methods for manufacturing a high-quality, low-turbulence Froude scale wind environment in a wave basin to facilitate simultaneous application of wind and waves to the model. Subsequently, the difficulties of scaling the highly Reynolds number–dependent wind turbine aerodynamics is presented in addition to methods for tailoring the turbine and wind characteristics to best emulate the full-scale condition. Lastly, the scaling methodology is demonstrated using results from 1/50th-scale floating wind turbine testing performed at the Maritime Research Institute Netherlands (MARIN) Offshore Basin. The model test campaign investigated the response of the 126 -m rotor diameter National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL) horizontal axis wind turbine atop three floating platforms: a tension-leg platform, a spar-buoy, and a semisubmersible. The results highlight the methodology's strengths and weaknesses for simulating full-scale global response of floating wind turbine systems.

References

References
1.
Chakrabarti
,
S. K.
,
1994
,
Offshore Structure Modeling
,
World Scientific
,
Singapore
.
2.
Roddier
,
D.
,
Cermelli
,
C.
,
Aubault
,
A.
, and
Weinstein
,
A.
,
2010
, “
WindFloat: A Floating Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy
,
2
, p.
033104
.10.1063/1.3435339
3.
Nielsen
,
F. G.
,
Hanson
,
T. D.
, and
Skaare
,
B.
,
2006
, “
Integrated Dynamic Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
Proc. 25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
,
Hamburg, Germany
, Paper No. OMAE2006-92291.
4.
Windsea
,
A. S.
,
2010
, “
Next Generation Floating Wind Farm
,”
Scand. Oil-Gas Mag.
,
7/8
, pp.
250
253
. Available at http://www.windsea.no/sfiles/01/3/file/scandinavian-oil-gas-magazine-no.-7_8-2010-artikkel.pdf
5.
Jonkman
,
J. M.
,
Butterfield
,
S.
,
Musial
,
W.
, and
Scott
,
G.
,
2009
, “
Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report No. NREL/TP-500-38060.
6.
Jonkman
,
J. M.
,
2010
, “
Definition of the Floating System for Phase IV of OC3
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report No. NREL/TP-500-47535.
7.
Martin
,
H. R.
,
2011
, “
Development of a Scale Model Wind Turbine for Testing of Offshore Floating Wind Turbine Systems
,” M.S. thesis, University of Maine, Orono, ME.
8.
Jonkman
,
J. M.
, and
Buhl
,
M. L.
Jr.,
2005
, “
FAST User's Guide
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report NREL/EL-500-38230.
9.
Leishman
,
J. G.
,
2000
,
Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics
,
Cambridge University
,
Cambridge, UK
.
10.
Peters
,
D. A.
, and
He
,
C. J.
,
1991
, “
Correlation of Measured Induced Velocities With a Finite-state Wake Model
,”
J. Am. Helicopter Soc.
,
36
(
3
), pp.
59
70
.10.4050/JAHS.36.59
11.
Glauert
,
H.
,
1926
,
The Elements of Aerofoil and Airscrew Theory
,
Cambridge University
,
Cambridge, UK
.
12.
Drela
,
M.
,
1989
, “
XFOIL: An Analysis and Design System for Low Reynolds Number Airfoils
,”
Proc. Conference on Low Reynolds Number Airfoil Aerodynamics, University of Notre Dame
.
13.
Drela
,
M.
, and
Giles
,
M. B.
,
1987
, “
Viscous-Inviscid Analysis of Transonic and Low Reynolds Number Airfoils
,”
AIAA J.
,
25
(
10
), pp.
1347
1355
.10.2514/3.9789
14.
van Walree
,
F.
, and
Yamaguchi
,
K.
,
1993
, “
Hydrofoil Research: Model Tests and Computations
,”
Proc. FAST ’93, 2nd International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation
,
Yokohama, Japan
, pp.
791
806
.
15.
Manwell
,
J. F.
,
McGowan
,
J. G.
, and
Rogers
,
A. L.
,
2009
,
Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Applications
,
2nd ed.
,
Wiley
,
West Sussex, UK
.
You do not currently have access to this content.