Floating structures have been proposed to support offshore wind turbines in deep water, where environmental forcing could subject the rotor to meaningful angular displacements in both precession and nutation, offering design challenges beyond conventional bottom-founded structures. This paper offers theoretical developments underlying an efficient methodology to compute the large-angle rigid body rotations of a floating wind turbine in the time domain. The tower and rotor-nacelle assembly (RNA) are considered as two rotational bodies in the space, for which two sets of Euler angles are defined and used to develop two systems of Euler dynamic equations of motion. Transformations between the various coordinate systems are derived in order to enable a solution for the motion of the tower, with gyroscopic, environmental, and restoring effects applied as external moments. An example is presented in which the methodology is implemented in matlab in order to simulate the time-histories of a floating tower with a RNA.

References

References
1.
Henderson
,
A. R.
, and
Vugts
,
J. H.
, 2001, “
Prospects for Floating Offshore Wind Energy
,”
Proceedings of the European Wind Energy Conference
.
2.
Chandrasekaran
,
S.
, and
Jainb
,
A. K.
, 1999, “
Dynamic Behaviour of Square and Triangular Offshore Tension Leg Platforms Under Regular Wave Loads
,”
J. Ocean Eng.
,
29
(
3
), pp.
278
313
.
3.
Bush
,
E.
, 2009, “
A Comparison of Alternate Foundation Models for Offshore Wind Turbines and Resulting Long-Term Loads
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
4.
Jonkman
,
J. M.
, and
Buhl
,
M. L. J.
, 2005, “
fast User’s Guide
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Technical Report NREL/EL-500-38230.
5.
WAMIT, Inc., 1995,
WAMIT: A Radiation-Diffraction Panel Program for Wave-Body Interactions–User’s Manual
, Department of Ocean Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA.
6.
Jonkman
,
J. M.
, 2007, “
Dynamic Modeling and Loads Analysis of an Offshore Floating Wind Turbine
,” National Energy Renewal Laboratory, Technical Report NREL/TP-500-41958.
7.
Stoneking
,
E.
, 2007, “
Newton-Euler Dynamic Equations of Motion for a Multi-body Spacecraft
,”
AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference
, pp.
1368
1380
.
8.
Saha
,
S.
, 1999, “
Dynamics of Serial Multibody Systems Using the Decoupled Natural Orthogonal Complement Matrices
,”
J. Appl. Mech.
,
66
(
4
), pp.
986
996
.
9.
Matsukuma
,
H.
, and
Utsunomiya
,
T.
, 2008, “
Motion Analysis of a Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Considering Rotor-Rotation
,”
J. Inst. Eng. Singapore
,
1
(
4
), pp.
268
279
.
10.
Hibbeler
,
R. C.
, 2004,
Engineering Mechanics: Statics and Dynamics
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
11.
Sweetman
,
B.
, and
Wang
,
L.
, 2011, “Large-Angle Rigid Body Dynamics of a Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Using Euler’s Equations of Motion,” NSF CMMI Research and Innovation Conference: Engineering for Sustainability and Prosperity.
12.
Eberly
,
D.
, 2008, “
Euler Angle Formulas
,”
Geometric Tools, LLC
,
Technical Report
.
13.
Jonkman
,
J.
, 2010, “
Definition of the Floating System for Phase IV of OC3
,” National Energy Renewal Laboratory, Technical Report NREL/TP-500-47535.
14.
Laino
,
D. J.
, 2005, “
NWTC Design Codes (IECwind)
,”
National Renewable Energy Lab
,
Technical Report.
15.
Kelley
,
N.
, and
Jonkman
,
B.
, 2008, “
NWTC Design Codes (Turbsim)
,” National Renewable Energy Lab, Technical Report.
16.
Nielsen
,
F. G.
,
Hanson
,
T. D.
, and
Skaare
,
B.
, 2006, “
Integrated Dynamic Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
.
17.
Sarpkaya
,
T.
, and
Issacson
,
M.
, 1981,
Mechanics of Wave Forces on Offshore Structures,
Van Nostrand Reinhold
,
New York.
18.
Guran
,
A.
, 1993, “
Studies in Spatial Motion of a Gyro on an Elastic-Foundation
,”
J. Mech. Struct. Mach.
,
21
(
1
), pp.
185
199
.
You do not currently have access to this content.