The increased exploration of deeper Arctic waters motivates the designs of new floating structures to operate under harsh Arctic conditions. Based on several model tests and investigations, structures with conical sections at the waterline have been shown to be a good design for waters where drifting ice is present, because the approaching ice fails in bending, which induces smaller loads than a crushing failure of ice. However, in most Arctic waters ice features are only present during part of the year and a large portion of the operation time of these structures will be in open water. Therefore, the floating structures must perform well in both conditions.Conical sections at the waterline will induce nonlinear coupling in the hydrostatic restoring forces and moments. It is important to understand how this affects the behavior in both ice and open water conditions. In order to investigate the nonlinear coupled hydrostatic restoring forces, an exact analytic expression for the metacentric height of a regular cone is presented. This is further used to develop an exact analytic expression for the hydrostatic restoring forces and moments for any body whose waterline intersects the frustum of a cone. A platform of the shallow draft-type, the platform type for which exact hydrostatics is most important, is used as a basis for the discussion and the effect of the coupled nonlinear restoring forces is illustrated by comparison to a model test performed in both open water and ice conditions.

References

References
1.
Løset
,
S.
,
Shkhinek
,
K.
,
Gudmestad
,
O. T.
,
Strass
,
P.
,
Michalenko
,
E.
,
Frederking
,
R.
, and
Kärnä
,
T.
, 1999, “
Comparison of The Physical Environment of Some Arctic Seas
,”
Cold Regions Sci. Technol.
,
29
, pp.
201
214
.
2.
Gravesen
,
H.
,
Sørensen
,
S. L.
,
Vølund
,
P.
,
Barker
,
A.
, and
Timco
,
G.
, 2005, “
Ice Loading on Danish Wind Turbines: Part 2. Analyses of Dynamic Model Test Results
,”
Cold Regions Sci. Technol.
,
41
, pp.
25
47
.
3.
Wright
,
B.
, 2000, “
Full Scale Experience with Stationkeeping Operations in Pack Ice
,” PERD/CHC Report No. 25–44.
4.
Dalane
,
O.
,
Gudmestad
,
O. T.
,
Løset
,
S.
,
Amdahl
,
J.
,
Fjell
,
K. H.
, and
Hildèn
,
T. E.
, 2008, “
Model Testing of a Surface Buoy for Arctic Conditions
,”
Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
,
Estoril
,
Portugal
, 15–20 June.
5.
Dalane
,
O.
,
Aksnes
,
V.
,
Løset
,
S.
, and
Aarsnes
,
J. V.
, 2009, “
A Moored Arctic Floater in First-Year Sea Ice Ridges
,”
Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
,
Honolulu
,
Hawaii, USA
, 31 May–5 June.
6.
Srinivasan
,
N.
,
Chakrabarti
,
S.
,
Sundaravadivelu
,
R.
, and
Kanotra
,
R.
, 2008, “
Hydrodynamics of a SPAR-type FPSO Concept for Application as a Production Platform
,”
Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
,
Estoril
,
Portugal
, 15–20 June.
7.
Chernetsov
,
V. A.
,
Malyutin
,
A. A.
, and
Karlinsky
,
A. L.
, 2008, “
Floating Production Platform for Polar Seas Designed to Resist Iceberg Impact
,”
Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
,
Vancouver
,
BC, Canada
, 6–11 July.
8.
Bruun
,
P.
,
Husvik
,
J.
,
Le-Guennec
,
S.
, and
Hellmann
,
J.
, 2009, “
Ice Model Test of an Arctic SPAR
,”
The 20th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions
,
Luleå
,
Sweden
, 9–12 June.
9.
Murray
,
J.
,
LeGuennec
,
S.
,
Spencer
,
D.
,
Yang
,
C.
, and
Yang
,
W.
, 2009, “
Model Tests on a Spar in Level Ice and Ice Ridge Conditions
,”
Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
,
Honolulu
,
Hawaii, USA
, 31 May–5 June.
10.
Cummins
,
W.
, 1962, “
The Impulse Response Function and Ship Motions
,”
Schiffstechnik
,
9
, pp.
101
109
.
11.
Ogilvie
,
T.
, 1964, “
Recent Progress Towards the Understanding and Prediction of Ship motions
,”
Fifth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics
,
Bergen
,
Norway
, 10–12 September, pp.
3
79
.
12.
Newman
,
J. N.
, 1977
Marine Hydrodynamics
,
The MIT Press
,
Cambridge
.
13.
Faltinsen
,
O. M.
, 1990,
Sea Loads on Ships and Offshore Structures
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, England
.
14.
Taghipour
,
R.
,
Perez
,
T.
, and
Moan
,
T.
, 2008, “
Hybrid Frequency-Time Domain Models for Dynamic Response Analysis of Marine Structures
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
35
(
7
), pp.
685
705
.
15.
Perez
,
T.
, and
Fossen
,
T. I.
, 2008, “
Time- vs. Frequency-Domain Identification of Parametric Radiation Force Models for Marine Structures at Zero Speed
,”
Model. Identif. Control
,
29
(
1
), pp.
1
19
.
16.
Rawson
,
K. J.
, and
Tupper
,
E. C.
, 2001,
Basic Ship Theory
,
5th ed.
,
Butterworth-Heinemann
,
Oxford
, Vol.
1
.
17.
Haslum
,
H. A.
, 2000, “
Simplified Methods Applied to Nonlinear Motion of Spar Platforms
,” Doctoral thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
18.
Edwards
,
C. H.
, and
Penney
,
D. E.
, (1998)
Calculus with Analytic Geometry
,
5th ed.
,
Prentice Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
19.
Taz Ul Mulk
,
M.
, and
Falzarano
,
J.
, 1994, “
Complete Six-Degrees-Of-Freedom Nonlinear Ship Rolling Motion
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
116
(
4
), pp.
191
201
.
20.
Dalane
,
O.
,
Knudsen
,
F.
, and
Løset
,
S.
, 2009, “
Nonlinear Coupled Hydrostatics of Floating Conical Platforms
,”
Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
,
Honolulu
,
Hawaii, USA
, 31 May–5 June.
21.
WAMIT, 2009. WAMIT Inc. MA, USA. Version 6.4.
22.
Multisurf, 2008. Aerohydro Inc. USA. Version 6.9.
23.
Perez
,
T.
, and
Fossen
,
T. I.
, 2008, “
A Derivation of High-Frequency Asymptotic Values of 3D Added Mass and Damping Based on Properties of the Cummins Equation
,”
J. Marit. Res.
,
5
(
1
), pp.
65
78
.
24.
Standsberg
,
C. T.
, 2006, “
Shallow Draft Buoy - Feasibility Model Test
,” MARINTEK Technical Report No. 580060.00.01.
25.
Bonnemaire
,
B.
,
Shkhinek
,
K.
,
Lundamo
,
T.
,
Bolshev
,
A.
,
Liferov
,
P.
, and
Le Guennec
,
S.
, 2009, “
Dynamic Effects in the Response of Moored structure to Ice Ridge Interactions
,”
Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions
,
Luleå
,
Sweden, June 9-12
.
26.
ISO/DIS 19906, 2008, “
Petroleum and natural gas industries - Arctic offshore structures
,” Geneva, Switzerland.
27.
Lundamo
,
T.
,
Bonnemaire
,
B.
,
Jensen
,
A.
, and
Gudmestad
,
O.
, 2008, “
Back-Calculation of the Ice Load Applying on a Moored Vessel
,”
Proceedings of the 19th IAHR International Symposium on Ice
,
Vancouver
,
Canada
, 6–11 July.
28.
Box
,
G. E. P.
,
Hunter
,
J. S.
, and
Hunter
,
W. G.
, 2005,
Statistics for Experimenters
,
2nd ed.
,
Wiley-Interscience
,
New Jersey
.
29.
Brown
,
T. G.
, and
Määttänen
,
M.
, 2009, “
Comparison of Kemi-I and Confederation Bridge Cone Ice Load Measurement Results
,”
Cold Regions Sci. Technol.
,
55
(
1
), pp.
3
13
.
30.
Ralston
,
T. D.
, 1977, “
Ice Force Design Considerations for Conical Offshore Structures
,”
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions
, 26–30 September, Vol.
2
, pp.
741
752
.
You do not currently have access to this content.