Calculated probabilities of fatigue failure depend on the analysis procedure used for design. Calculated probabilities of a fatigue failure also depend on long term stress ranges due to loading and uncertainties associated with this. In order to ensure the consistent safety level for assessment of fatigue failure, the design fatigue factors (DFFs) to be used for fatigue design should be dependent on the analysis procedure and premises used. In the present paper, an assessment of appropriate DFFs for piles subjected to dynamic actions from pile driving has been performed by probabilistic analysis based on: uncertainty with respect to dynamic cyclic stress during pile driving, and fatigue capacity of circumferential welds in piles. Accumulated probabilities of fatigue failures in pile butt welds are presented. An assessment of uncertainties involved in calculation of stress ranges during pile driving has been performed. It is shown that the uncertainty in loading when driving records are known is lower than that estimated on the basis of soil data. Thus, in order to obtain consistent safety levels, different DFFs should be used when calculated stress ranges are derived based on soil data only, as compared with the actual stress ranges and number of blows determined from driving records. The results from probabilistic analyses together with recommended design fatigue factors are presented in this paper.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: michael.hall@conocophillips.com
Article navigation
November 2010
Structures, Safety and Reliability
Recommended Design Fatigue Factors for Reassessment of Piles Subjected to Dynamic Actions From Driving
Inge Lotsberg,
Inge Lotsberg
DNV
, Veritasveien 1, Oslo, 1322 Norway
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael E. Hall
e-mail: michael.hall@conocophillips.com
Michael E. Hall
ConocoPhillips Norge AS
, Ekofiskveien 35, Tananger Stavanger, 4056 Norway
Search for other works by this author on:
Inge Lotsberg
DNV
, Veritasveien 1, Oslo, 1322 Norway
Gudfinnur Sigurdsson
Knut Arnesen
Michael E. Hall
ConocoPhillips Norge AS
, Ekofiskveien 35, Tananger Stavanger, 4056 Norwaye-mail: michael.hall@conocophillips.com
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. Nov 2010, 132(4): 041603 (8 pages)
Published Online: September 23, 2010
Article history
Received:
September 20, 2008
Revised:
December 16, 2009
Online:
September 23, 2010
Published:
September 23, 2010
Citation
Lotsberg, I., Sigurdsson, G., Arnesen, K., and Hall, M. E. (September 23, 2010). "Recommended Design Fatigue Factors for Reassessment of Piles Subjected to Dynamic Actions From Driving." ASME. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. November 2010; 132(4): 041603. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001418
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Ultra-Short-Term Mooring Forces Forecasting for Floating Wind Turbines With Response-Frequency-Informed Deep Learning and On-Site Data
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (October 2025)
Validation of a Frequency-Dependent Morison Force Formulation for a Large Monopile in Severe Irregular Seas
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (October 2025)
Study of Temperature Field in Helical Carcass-Supported Flexible Cryogenic Pipes for Liquefied Natural Gas
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (October 2025)
Study of Evolving Young Wind Waves Under Steady Wind Forcing
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (October 2025)
Related Articles
Assessment of Fatigue Safety Factors for Deep-Water Risers in Relation to VIV
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (November,2005)
Safety Envelope for Load Tolerance and its Application to Fatigue Reliability Design
J. Mech. Des (July,2006)
An Approach for a Statistical Evaluation of Uncertainty in Assessing Fatigue Usage Including Environmental Effects
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (October,2015)
A Reliability-Based Approach for Low-Cycle Fatigue Design of Class 2 and 3 Nuclear Piping
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (October,2010)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Subsection NE—Class MC Components
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes, Volume 1 Sixth Edition
Subsection NE — Class MC Components
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Third Edition
Subsection NE—Class MC Components
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Second Edition