We address, using probabilistic modeling and the extreme-value-distribution technique, the helicopter undercarriage strength in a helicopter-landing-ship situation. Our analysis contains an attempt to quantify, on the probabilistic basis, the role of the human factor in the situation in question. This factor is important from the standpoint of the operation time that affects the likelihood of safe landing during the lull period in the sea condition. The operation time includes (1) the time required for the officer-on-ship-board and the helicopter pilot to make their go-ahead decisions and (2) the time of actual landing. It is assumed, for the sake of simplicity, that both these times could be approximated by Rayleigh’s law, while the lull duration follows the normal law with a high enough ratio of the mean value to the standard deviation. Safe landing could be expected if the probability that it occurs during the lull time is sufficiently high. The probability that the helicopter undercarriage strength is not compromised can be evaluated as a product of the probability that landing indeed occurs during the lull time and the probability that the relative velocity of the helicopter undercarriage with respect to the ship’s deck at the moment of encounter does not exceed the allowable level. This level is supposed to be determined for the helicopter-landing-ground situation. The developed model can be used when developing specifications for the undercarriage strength, as well as guidelines for personnel training. Particularly, the model can be of help when establishing the times to be met by the two humans involved to make their go-ahead decisions for landing and to actually land the helicopter. Plenty of additional risk analyses (associated with the need to quantify various underlying uncertainties) and human psychology related efforts will be needed, of course, to make such guidelines practical.

1.
O’Neil
,
W. A.
, 2001, “
The Human Element in Shipping
,”
Biennial Symposium of the Seafarers International Research Center
, Cardiff, Wales, Jun. 29.
2.
U.S. Coast Guard
, 1995,
Prevention Through People Quality Action Team Report
,
USCG
,
Washington, DC
.
3.
Boisson
,
P.
, 1999,
Safety at Sea: Policies, Regulations and International Law
,
Bureau Veritas
,
Paris
.
4.
Miller
,
G.
, 1999, “
Human Factor Engineering (HFE): What Is It and How It Can Be Used to Reduce Human Errors in the Offshore Industry (OTC 10876)
,”
Proceedings of the 1999 Offshore Technology Conference
, Houston, TX, May 3–6.
5.
USCG Headquarters
, 2008, “
Analysis
,”
Training System Standard Operating Procedures
, Vol.
2
,
USCG
,
Washington, DC
.
6.
USCG Research and Development Center
, 2001, “
USCG Guide for the Management of Crew Endurance and Risk Factors
,” Report No. CF-D-13-01.
7.
Foyle
,
D. C.
, and
Hooey
,
B. L.
, 2008,
Human Performance Modeling in Aviation
,
CRC
,
Boca Raton, FL
.
8.
Suhir
,
E.
, 1997,
Applied Probability for Engineers and Scientists
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
9.
Fleischmann
,
D. S.
, 1970, “
Method and System for Predicting Ship Motion or the Like to Assist in Helicopter Landing
,” U.S. Patent No. 6,064,924.
10.
Heggertveit
,
F.
, 1970, “
Horizon Indicators for Assisting Helicopter Landing on Ships
,” U.S. Patent No. 3,516,375.
11.
Mcgee
,
L. A.
,
Paulk
,
C. H.
, Jr.
,
Steck
,
S. A.
,
Schmidt
,
S. F.
, and
Merz
,
A. W.
, 1979,
Evaluation of the Navigation Performance of Shipboard-VTOL-Landing Guidance Systems
,
NASA-Ames Research Center
,
Moffett Field, CA
.
12.
Phatak
,
A. V.
,
Karmali
,
M. S.
, and
Paulk
,
C. H.
, Jr.
, 1983,
Ship Motion Pattern Directed VTOL Letdown Guidance
,
NASA-Ames Research Center
,
Moffett Field, CA
.
13.
Paulk
,
C. H.
, Jr.
, and
Phatak
,
A. V.
, 1984,
Evaluation of a Real-Time Predictive Guidance Law for Landing VTOL Aircraft at Sea
,
NASA-Ames Research Center
,
Moffett Field, CA
.
14.
Blackwell
,
J.
, and
Feik
,
R. A.
, 1988, “
A Mathematical Model of the On-Deck Helicopter/Ship Dynamic Interface
,” Aerodynamic Technical Memorandum No. ADSB 130078.
15.
Thomson
,
D. G.
,
Coton
,
F. N.
, and
Galbraith
,
R. A. M.
, 2005, “
Simulator Study of Helicopter Ship Landing Procedures Incorporating Measured Flow Data
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Engineers, Part G: J. Aerosp. Eng.
0954-4100,
219
(
5
), pp.
1553
1565
.
16.
Swedish VISBY Class Corvette Sees First Helicopter Deck Landing: Ship-Helicopter Operation Limits (SHOL)
,” http://www.navalhistory.dk/english/navynews/2006/1115_visbylynx.htmhttp://www.navalhistory.dk/english/navynews/2006/1115_visbylynx.htm
17.
Carico
,
D.
, and
Ferrier
,
B.
, 2006, “
Evaluating Landing Aids to Support Helicopter/Ship Testing and Operations
,”
Aerospace Conference, 2006 IEEE
, Mar.,
4
(
4–11
).
18.
Suhir
,
E.
, 2001, “
Adequate Underkeel Clearance (UKC) for a Ship Passing a Shallow Waterway: Application of the Extreme Value Distribution (EVD)
,”
Proceedings of the OMAE 2001
, Rio-de-Janeiro, Brazil, Paper No. OMAE2001/S&R-2113.
19.
Soukissian
,
T. H.
, and
Samalikos
,
P. E.
, 2006, “
Analysis of the Duration and Intensity of the Sea State Using Segmentation of Significant Wave Height Time Series
,”
Proceedings of the 16th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
, San Francisco, CA, May 28–Jun. 2.
You do not currently have access to this content.