As the oil offloading operations of floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) units become more routine, the desire grows to increase the availability for offloading and thus decrease production downtime. Experience with these operations is the main tool available to increase the efficiency of this aspect of deepwater production. However, it is clear that a formal optimization approach can help to fine tune design parameters so that not only is availability increased but the significance of each design parameter can be better understood. The key issue is to define the environmental conditions under which the vessels involved in offloading are able to maintain position. By this, we reduce the notion of availability to a set of operating criteria, which can or cannot be met for a particular set of environmental conditions. The actual operating criteria such as relative vessel heading depend on selection of design parameters, such as the direction and magnitude of external force applied by thrusters or tugs. In the earliest offloading operations, engineering judgment was used to determine the feasibility of offloading at a particular time. For example, if wind and current were not expected to exceed a $1year$ return period, offloading may be considered safe. This approach can be both conservative and unconservative, depending on the nuances of the particular environmental conditions. This study will propose a formal approach to choosing the design parameters that optimize the availability of a FPSO for offloading. A simple analysis model will be employed so that optimization can be performed quickly using a robust second order method. The proposed analysis model will be compared to model test data to demonstrate its agreement with the more complex system.

1.
Henriques
,
C. C. D.
, 2000, “
Petrobras Experience on the Mooring of Conventional Shuttle Tankers to Dynamically Positioned FPSOs
,” in
Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
, Number 1, pp.
323
330
.
2.
Morandini
,
C.
,
Legerstee
,
F.
,
Francois
,
M.
, and
Raposo
,
C. V.
, 2001, “
,” in
Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
, Number 1, pp.
11
20
.
3.
Morandini
,
C.
,
Legerstee
,
F.
, and
Mombaerts
,
J.
, 2002, “
,” in
Proceedings of the Annual Offshore Technology Conference
, pp.
2751
2755
.
4.
Lee
,
D. H.
, and
Choi
,
H. S.
, 2000, “
Dynamic Analysis of FPSO-Shuttle Tanker System
,” in
Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
, Number 1, pp.
302
307
.
5.
Morishita
,
H. M.
, and
De Souza
,
J. R.
, Jr.
, 2002, “
Dynamic Behavior of a DICAS FPSO and Shuttle Vessel Under the Action of Wind, Current and Waves
,” in
Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
, Number 12, pp.
142
150
.
6.
Booker
,
A. J.
,
Dennis
,
J. E.
, Jr.
,
Frank
,
P. D.
,
Serafini
,
D. B.
,
Torczon
,
V.
, and
Trosset
,
M. W.
, 1999, “
A Rigorous Framework for Optimization of Expensive Functions by Surrogates
,”
Marine Mammal Sci.
0824-0469,
17
(
1
), pp.
1
13
.
7.
Jain
,
R. K.
, 1980, “
A Simple Method of Calculating the Equivalent Stiffness in Mooring Cables
,”
Appl. Ocean. Res.
0141-1187,
2
(
3
), pp.
139
142
.
8.
Inoue
,
Y.
, and
Islam
,
M. R.
, 1999, “
Comparative Study of Numerical Simulation and the Experimental Results for a Parallely Connected FPSO and LNG in Waves
,” in
Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
, Number 1, pp.
360
367
.
9.
Guedes
,
S. C.
,
Fonseca
,
N.
, and
Pascoal
,
R.
, 2001, “
Experimental and Numerical Study of the Motions of a Turret Moored FPSO in Waves
,” in
Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
, Number 1, pp.
185
193
.
10.
1994, Prediction of Wind and Current Loads on VLCCs, Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF),
2nd ed.
11.
Codiglia
,
R.
,
Contento
,
G.
,
D’Este
,
F.
,
Galeazzi
,
F.
,
Sole
,
V.
,
Coan
,
A.
, and
Spezzati
,
M.
, 2002, “
Experimental Study on a Spread Catenary Mooring for FPSO
,” in
Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
, Number 12, pp.
132
141
.
12.
Wilkerson
,
S. M.
, 2005, “
An Optimization Algorithm for Minimum Weight Design of Steel Frames With Nonsmooth Stress Constraints
,” Ph.D. thesis, Rice University, Houston, TX.
13.
Eldred
,
M. S.
, and
Dunlavy
,
D. M.
, 2006, “
Formulations for Surrogate-Based Optimization With Data Fit, Multifidelity, and Reduced-Order Models
,” in
Proceedings of the 11th AIAA∕ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference
,
Portsmouth, VA
, pp.
1
20
.