Floating breakwaters have potential applications in protecting minor ports and harbors such as fisheries and recreational harbors, where-in stringent tranquillity requirements are not warranted. In field applications of the existing floating breakwaters, limitations are imposed due to their large relative width (ratio between breakwater width and wave length) requirements to achieve desirable tranquillity level. This relative width requirement is greater than 0.3 for the existing floating breakwaters. To overcome the above drawback associated with the existing system a new configuration for a floating breakwater is derived, which could yield the desired performance with minimum relative width requirement. The floating breakwater comprises of two pontoons rigidly connected together and each of the pontoons having a row of cylinders attached beneath, for improved performance characteristics. The laboratory tests were conducted in both regular and random wave flumes to study the dynamic behavior of the breakwater. Transmission and reflection coefficients, water surface elevations and velocities inside the cage like area provided in between the pontoons, rigid body motions floating breakwater and mooring forces were studied under regular and random waves and under the regular waves followed by a uniform current. The results proved the suitability of the floating breakwater to the field conditions even for large wave periods. In addition the variations in water particle kinematics, rigid body motion and mooring forces show nominal magnitudes when compared to the existing systems indicating the rigidness of the breakwater.

1.
Bishop
,
C. T.
, 1982, “
Floating Tire Breakwater Design Comparison
,”
J. Waterw., Port, Coastal, Ocean Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng.
0148-9895,
108
(
3
), pp.
421
426
.
2.
Brebner
,
A.
, and
Ofuya
,
A. O.
, 1968, “
Floating Breakwaters
,”
Proc. of the 11th Conf. on Coastal Engineering, ASCE
,
2
, pp.
1055
1094
.
3.
Carver
,
R. D.
, and
Davidson
,
D. D.
, 1983, “
Sloping Float Breakwater Model Study
,”
Coastal Structures
,
83
, pp.
417
432
.
4.
Kato
,
J.
,
Hagino
,
S.
, and
Uekita
,
Y.
, 1966, “
Damping Effect of Floating Breakwater to which Anti-Rolling System is Applied
,”
Coastal Eng.
0378-3839,
63
, pp.
1068
1078
.
5.
Mani
,
J. S.
, 1991, “
Design of Y-Frame Floating Breakwater
,”
J. Waterw., Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng.
0733-950X,
117
(
2
), pp.
105
119
.
6.
Murali
,
K.
, and
Mani
,
J. S.
, 1997, “
Performance of a Cage Floating Breakwater
,”
J. Waterw., Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng.
0733-950X,
123
(
4
), pp.
172
179
.
7.
Murali
,
K.
, 1996, “
Performance Analysis of a Cage Floating Breakwater (CFB)
,” PhD Dissertation, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, Sep. 1996.
8.
Murali
,
K.
, and
Mani
,
J. S.
, 1996a, “
Response of a Cage Floating Breakwater to Regular and Irregular Waves
,”
10th congress of the APD-IAHR
, Malaysia.
9.
Murali
,
K.
, and
Mani
,
J. S.
, 1996b, “
Floating Breakwater Response to Regular Waves
,”
Conference in Ocean Engineering’96
, Ocean Engineering Center, IIT, Madras, India.
10.
Lipson
,
C.
, and
Sheth
,
N. J.
, 1973,
Statistical design and analysis of engineering experiments
,
McGraw-Hill
, New York.
11.
Mani
,
J. S.
, and
Jayakumar
,
S.
, 1995, “
Wave Transmission by Suspended Type Breakwater
,”
J. Waterw., Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng.
0733-950X,
121
(
6
), pp.
335
338
.
12.
Li
,
Y. C.
, and
Herbich
,
J. B.
, 1981, “
A Nomogram for the Determination of Wave Length and Wave Celerity During the Interaction of Waves and Current
,”
TR COE-256, Ocean Engg. programme
, Texas A & M Univ.
13.
McCartney
,
B. L.
, 1985, “
Floating Breakwater Design
,”
J. Waterw., Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng.
0733-950X,
111
(
2
), pp.
304
318
.
You do not currently have access to this content.