Waves in the ocean are nonlinear, random, and directionally spread, but engineering calculations are almost always made using waves that are either linear and random or nonlinear and regular. Until recently, methods for more accurate computations simply did not exist. Increased computer speeds and continued theoretical developments have now led to tools which can produce much more realistic waves for engineering applications. The purpose of this paper is to review some of these developments. The simplest nonlinearities are the second-order bound waves caused by the pairwise interaction of linear components of the wave spectrum. It is fairly easy to simulate the second-order surface resulting from those interactions, a fact which has recently been exploited to estimate the probability distribution of wave crest heights. Once the evolution of the surface is known, the kinematics of the subsurface flow can be evaluated reasonably easily from Laplace’s equation. Much of the bound wave structure can also be captured by using the Creamer transformation, a definite integral over the spatial domain which modifies the structure of the wave field at one instant in time. In some ways, the accuracy of the Creamer transformation is higher than second order. Finally, many groups have developed numerical wave tanks which can solve the nonlinear wave equations to arbitrary accuracy. The computational cost of these solutions is still rather high, but they can directly calculate potential forces on large structures as well as providing test cases for the less accurate, but more efficient, methods.

1.
Colman, The Honorable Mr. Justice, 2000, Report of the Reopened Formal Investigation into the Loss of the MV Derbyshire, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, Norwich.
2.
Gjosund, S. H., Moe, G., and Arntsen, O. A., 2001, “Kinematics in Broad-Banded Irregular Ocean Waves by a Lagrangian Formulation,” Proc., 20th Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference, OMAE01/OFT-1231, Rio de Janiero, Brazil.
3.
Longuet-Higgins
,
M. S.
,
1963
, “
The Effect of Non-linearities on Statistical Distributions in the Theory of Sea Waves
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
17
, pp.
459
480
.
4.
Sharma
,
J. N.
, and
Dean
,
R. G.
,
1981
, “
Second-order Directional Seas and Associated Wave Forces
,”
Soc. Pet. Eng. J.
,
4
, pp.
129
140
.
5.
Prevosto, M., 1998, “Effect of Directional Spreading and Spectral Bandwidth on the Nonlinearity of the Irregular Waves,” Proc., Eight International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Montreal, Canada, pp. 119–123
6.
Prevosto
,
M.
,
Krogstad
,
H. E.
, and
Robin
,
A.
,
2000
, “
Probability Distributions for Maximum Wave and Crest heights
,”
Coastal Eng.
,
40
, pp.
329
360
.
7.
Forristall
,
G. Z.
,
2000
, “
Wave Crest Distributions: Observations and Second-Order Theory
,”
J. Phys. Oceanogr.
,
30
, pp.
1931
1943
.
8.
van Unen, R. F., van Beuzekom, A. A., Forristall, G. Z., Mathisen, J.-P., and Starke, J., 1998, “WACSIS—Wave Crest Sensor Intercomparison Study at the Meetpost Noordwijk Measurement Platform,” Oceans ’98, Nice, France, IEEE, pp. 192–197.
9.
Tromans, P. S., and Taylor, P. H., 1998, “The Shapes, Histories and Statistics of Extreme Wave Crests,” Proc., OMAE98, 17th Int. Conf. on Offshore Mech. and Arctic Eng., Lisbon, Portugal.
10.
Zhang
,
J.
,
Yang
,
J.
,
Wen
,
J.
,
Prislin
,
I.
, and
Hong
,
K.
,
1999
a, “
Deterministic Wave Model for Short-crested Ocean Waves: Part I: Theory and Numerical Scheme
Appl. Ocean. Res.
,
21
, pp.
167
188
.
11.
Zhang
,
J.
,
1999
, “
Hybrid Wave Models and Their Applications for Steep Ocean Waves
,”
Marine Tech. Soc. J.
,
33
, pp.
15
26
.
12.
Spell
,
C. A.
,
Zhang
,
J.
, and
Randall
,
R. E.
,
1996
, “
Hybrid Wave Model for Unidirectional Irregular Waves—Part II. Comparison With Laboratory Measurements
,”
Appl. Ocean. Res.
,
18
, pp.
93
110
.
13.
Zhang
,
J.
,
Prislin
,
I.
, and
Wen
,
J.
,
1999
, “
Deterministic Wave Model for Short-crested Ocean Waves—Part II: Comparison With Laboratory and Field Measurements
,”
Appl. Ocean. Res.
,
21
, pp.
189
206
.
14.
Creamer
,
D. B.
,
Henyey
,
F.
,
Schult
,
R.
, and
Wright
,
J.
,
1989
, “
Improved Linear Representation of Ocean Surface Waves
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
205
, pp.
135
161
.
15.
Taylor, P. H., Ohl, C. O. G., and Sauvee, J., 1999, “Focussed Wave Groups 1: Local Structure, Kinematics, and the Creamer Transform,” Proc., 18th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME.
16.
Fenton
,
J. D.
, and
Rienecker
,
J.
,
1982
, “
A Fourier Method for Solving Nonlinear Water-Wave Problems: Application to Solitary-Wave Interactions
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
188
, pp.
411
443
.
17.
Tromans, P. S., Anaturk, A., and Hagemeijer, P., 1991, “A New Model for the Kinematics of Large Ocean Waves—Application as a Design Wave,” Proc., First Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf. (ISOPE), Vol. 3, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 64–71.
18.
Kim
,
C. H.
,
Clement
,
A. H.
, and
Tanizawa
,
K.
,
1999
, “
Recent Research and Development of Numerical Wave Tanks—A Review
,”
Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng.
,
9
,
241
256
.
19.
Clement, A. H., 1999, “Benchmark Test Cases for Numerical Wave Absorption: 1st Workshop of ISOPE Numerical Wave Tank Group, Montreal, Canada, May 1998,” Proc., Ninth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Brest, pp. 266–289.
20.
Craig
,
W.
, and
Sulem
,
C.
,
1993
, “
Numerical Simulation of Gravity Waves
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
108
, pp.
73
83
.
21.
Bateman, W. J. D., 2000, “A Numerical Investigation of Three-Dimensional Extreme Water Waves,” Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK.
22.
Bateman, W. J. D., Swan, C., and Taylor, P. H., 1999, “Steep Multi-Directional Waves on Constant Water Depth,” Proc., 18th Int. Conf. on Offshore Mech. and Arctic Eng., July 11–16, St. Johns, Newfoundland, Canada, Paper OMAE/S&R-6463.
23.
Bateman, W. J. D., Swan, C., and Taylor, P. H., 2001, “Efficient Numerical Simulation of Directional-Spread Water Waves,” submitted to J. Comput. Phys.
You do not currently have access to this content.